Skip to comments.
Lesbians Get Married In SF
Fox News ^
| 2/12/04
| Fox News
Posted on 02/12/2004 3:25:48 PM PST by Eisenhower
Edited on 04/22/2004 12:38:59 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
SAN FRANCISCO
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aids; civilunion; culturewars; gayintoleristas; homosexualagenda; insanity; marriage; moraldebauchery; perversion; romans1; sanfrancisco; stunt; wagesofsin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
To: Eisenhower
I thought this was about Nancy and Hillary.
2
posted on
02/12/2004 3:28:48 PM PST
by
Paul Atreides
(Is it really so difficult to post the entire article?)
To: Eisenhower
They must love Bush.
3
posted on
02/12/2004 3:30:52 PM PST
by
swarthyguy
(How much America has Saudi Money bought.)
To: Eisenhower
Here's the lovely couple:
Not a dry eye in the house, lol.
4
posted on
02/12/2004 3:36:20 PM PST
by
Reagan is King
(The modern definition of 'racist' is someone who is winning an argument with a liberal.)
Comment #5 Removed by Moderator
To: Eisenhower
Should have given them a copy of Animal Farm with the parts about some animals being more equal than others highlighted.
6
posted on
02/12/2004 3:38:25 PM PST
by
thoughtomator
("What do I know? I'm just the President." - George W. Bush, Superbowl XXXVIII halftime statement)
To: Eisenhower
They're lesbians? Shocking!!!
7
posted on
02/12/2004 3:39:19 PM PST
by
NCLaw441
To: Reagan is King
79 and 83 hunh? If this was for real, I wonder which one loses some benefits? I wonder how much of their assets will be used to pay for the nursing homes and in-home health care?
8
posted on
02/12/2004 3:39:41 PM PST
by
OpusatFR
(Seach Google for your screen name. Get a surprise!)
To: Eisenhower
These city official must be on Karl Rove's payroll. A nationwide struggle over gay marriage, and the requisite constitutional amendment are extremely polarizing - 60-40 may be 70-30 our way. It beats having to fight elections year battles on 50/50 issues like the economy, SS or WMD.
9
posted on
02/12/2004 3:47:46 PM PST
by
azcap
To: swarthyguy
They must love Bush.Only if it's in lowercase.
10
posted on
02/12/2004 3:48:38 PM PST
by
Paul Atreides
(Is it really so difficult to post the entire article?)
To: Eisenhower
Lesbians Get Married In SFBeing near SF myself, is it any wonder why this is a dating desert? Another in a long line of reasons why I went overseas to find a woman.
11
posted on
02/12/2004 3:51:04 PM PST
by
Mark17
To: Paul Atreides
I wonder what will happen when they file a joint tax return with a married status? Can you say J-A-I-L?
To: azcap
Bush and the gay lobby acting in junction to help re-elect a Republican to the White House?
I've seen some real nutjobs in this forum over the years, but you may just take the cake.
13
posted on
02/12/2004 3:52:47 PM PST
by
Luis Gonzalez
(The Gift Is To See The Trout.)
To: Reagan is King
If a marriage isn't consummated it isn't a marriage.
Consummate: 1.To bring to fulfillment. 2.To complete (a marriage)by sexual intercourse.
Sexual Intercourse:An intimate physical relationship between man and women involving the use of the sexual organs.
Scholars are going to be busy rewriting the dictionary.
14
posted on
02/12/2004 3:54:29 PM PST
by
Spunky
(This little tag just keeps following me where ever I go.)
To: Reagan is King; WKB; My2Cents; CARepubGal; doodlelady; Travis McGee; South40; Poohbah
Several of the homosexual/lesbian movement are celebrating in Hillcrest as I type this.
Mississippi, here I come. And none to soon.
15
posted on
02/12/2004 3:55:30 PM PST
by
onyx
(Your secrets are safe with me and all my friends.)
To: Spunky
Scholars have long rewritten the laws.
Where do you think legislators go when they want to write a law? There are groups which write "model laws". These are proposed potential laws. The most famous group is the ALI. Their rewriting of marriage laws is what mass and Hawaii looked at in sanctioning homosexual marriage.
There is no equivalent conservative "model law" think tank.
The standard for marriage under the law is 1. age of consent 2. not closer than first cousins 3. one man one woman (father/mother child breeding/raising pair) 4. not married to another.
If the only standard is orgasm as essetially establishe by the ALI and now SF then the only standard in law is feelings. (S)Why did you kill? if it felt good its ok. (/s)
To: Eisenhower
So decadence is alive and well in SF.
Who knew?
17
posted on
02/12/2004 4:01:01 PM PST
by
South40
(My vote helped defeat cruz bustamante; did yours?)
To: Paul Atreides
Only if it's in lowercase. ,,, post of the day award to you!
To: Reagan is King
As for the photo, just reminds me of what my Grandmother use to say, "there's no fool, like an old fool".
If this thing goes through, I believe a lot of elderly people will marry friends...even if they are not homosexual, so that they can share medical and soc. Security benefits. This whole can of worms is going to increase the national budget, to astronomical proportions.
19
posted on
02/12/2004 4:11:37 PM PST
by
tuckrdout
(Terri Schindler (Schiavo) deserves to have her wishes honored: Give her a DIVORCE!)
Comment #20 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson