Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

San Francisco Officials Marry Gay Couple
AP ^

Posted on 02/12/2004 12:16:31 PM PST by BurbankKarl

February 12, 2004, 2:57 PM EST

SAN FRANCISCO -- In a political and legal challenge to California law, city authorities officiated at the marriage of a lesbian couple Thursday and said they will issue more gay marriage licenses.

The act of civil disobedience was coordinated by Mayor Gavin Newsom and top city officials and was intended to beat a conservative group to the punch.

The group, Campaign for California Families, had planned to go to court on Friday to get an injunction preventing the city from issuing marriage licenses to gay couples.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsday.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: aids; antifamily; antimarriage; civilunion; counterfeitmarriage; fraudmarriage; gayintoleristas; homosexualagenda; marriage; redefiningmarriage; romans1; samesexmarriage; sanfrancisco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 next last
To: jde1953
Therefore, no contract between a human and animal is valid.

Perhaps - but if the animal isn't harmed, then given the current arguments, there is really no reason not to allow open sex between the species. Disgusting, but that is where we are headed. Scalia made this argument in the LAwrence case.

81 posted on 02/12/2004 2:45:30 PM PST by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl
It's too bad other people in SF don't put up thousands of copies of the Big Ten all over city property in acts of "civil disobedience" as well.
82 posted on 02/12/2004 2:47:15 PM PST by freeangel (freeangel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen
The one I posted from

http://www.worldmag.com/world/issue/06-14-97/national_1.asp

This one has quotes

http://www.mistersf.com/notorious/index.html?notdavisbday.htm

83 posted on 02/12/2004 2:48:23 PM PST by philetus (Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
Four percent of New York men ages 40-49 are HIV-positive

or

75,000 New Yorkers Have HIV/AIDS

Which headline do you prefer?
84 posted on 02/12/2004 2:52:23 PM PST by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen
"Perhaps - but if the animal isn't harmed, then given the current arguments, there is really no reason not to allow open sex between the species. Disgusting, but that is where we are headed."

Surprise! We are much closer than you may think, if not already there. In the state of Texas, bastion of the GOP and heart of the Bible belt, bestiality in public is a crime, but as long as you keep the barn door locked, you and old Bossie can have at it to your heart's content. See http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/statutes/pe/pe0002100.html#pe003.21.07 Pardon me if I don't hold my breath while waiting for howls of outrage about this moral degradation exhibited by the citizens of Texas.
85 posted on 02/12/2004 3:01:41 PM PST by jde1953
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Agnes Heep
They can play whatever charades they like (such as pretending that a rectum is a sex organ), but they're not married unless the marriage is recognized by the State.

Or by God.

86 posted on 02/12/2004 3:01:46 PM PST by sergiod (W-04!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
"If homosexual marriage passes, remember, NAMBLA members can marry and legally adopt their boy sex toys."

As opposed to now, when they can adopt without marrying?
87 posted on 02/12/2004 3:42:20 PM PST by Kahonek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: philetus; My2Cents
The outcome suggests that even in the most secularized, liberal city in the nation, citizens' patience has its limits, but the end has not yet been reached.

Wow! The article took my breath away. I'm a Californian, but live in the L.A. area. Had never heard of this story before. I fear the final sentence pretty much says it all about the state of our nation these days. IF so, among other things, I wouldn't expect President Bush to be reelected.

If the general public does not remember its fear in the immediate aftermath of 9/11; if it has not reached the limits of tolerance for sleaze and degradation of social mores; if it cannot connect its own dots between the anthrax attacks and the reason we went into Iraq; if it does not recognize the danger of putting yet another 60's era radical into the White House, then perhaps the nation will deserve what it gets.

I know I'm probably being too gloomy, but there is something worrisome in the air about this election lately. Aside from all the carping from the right, the White House doesn't seem to be in fighting trim for the campaign. One can rarely expect a show of strength from Congressional Republicans, but where's the spunk from the White House? For example, they've allowed themselves to be baited into responding to the insulting and entirely phony National Guard flap, and are dealing with it on the Dems' terms. It's a no-win situation, because there will never be enough "evidence" to quiet the Dems and their media shills now that the White House has dignified their thoroughly manufactured "scandal." I don't know. As I said, maybe I'm just too gloomy right now.

88 posted on 02/12/2004 3:42:41 PM PST by Wolfstar (A self-confident cowboy nation, or a Kerrified nation. Your choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: sergiod
That goes without saying. I was simply referring to the temporal niceties.
89 posted on 02/12/2004 4:16:27 PM PST by Agnes Heep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
Ping. Seen this one yet?
90 posted on 02/12/2004 4:24:11 PM PST by scripter (Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar
I agree with you about disquiet regarding the election. I'm convinced that this election is GW Bush's, and the Republicans', to lose. Which means that if they don't kick it into gear soon, it could be lost. Most bothersome is that there's about 10% of the electorate that has no real convictions one way or another regarding the candidates, and they sway back and forth, depending on the impressions of the last news cycle, from one camp to the next. Yesterday, they were with Bush; today, they're with Kerry; tomorrow, who knows? This is why, I think, the news media concentrates on such trivial matters -- they know that trivial concerns, images, sound bites, the furrowed brow or a lifted eyebrow from Peter Jennings can sway this group of the squishy middle.

I'm convinced that the majority of people trust GW Bush. They believe him. They give him the benefit of the doubt. They want him to win. But if the White House comes out with a weak response to something, shows a hit of doubt or confusion, allows itself to get sucked into something shallow like the ANG story, the people's confidence in Bush will be shaken.

The nation cannot afford a Kerry in the White House. I fear for the nation if he, or someone of his ilk, wins. The Bush people have everything on their side -- the economy, the progress in Iraq, the steady progress in the war on terror. They should be knocking the Dems back on their heels, but they are not. This is what concerns me. It's still only February, so there is plenty of time to kick this thing in gear. I hope they start soon.

91 posted on 02/12/2004 4:25:12 PM PST by My2Cents ("Well...there you go again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl
"...a spokesperson for the city also announced that the city would be changing it's name to Thaan Fwancithco."
92 posted on 02/12/2004 4:29:11 PM PST by Destructor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: evets
I would like to comment on these pictures, but I'm pretty sure the Lead Moderator would ban me from Free Republic, if I did.
93 posted on 02/12/2004 4:35:49 PM PST by Destructor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: jde1953
My question still is: "Has anyone been required to show proof of marriage to the IRS to qualify for the MARRIED status on a 1040 return?"
94 posted on 02/12/2004 4:46:49 PM PST by leprechaun9 (Beware of little expenses because a small leak will sink a great ship!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar
then perhaps the nation will deserve what it gets.

It's not the "nation" that is at fault.
Homos are a very small minority, but they are running roughshod over the American people. WHY?

The majority of the American people don't want amnesties and uncontrolled illegal immegration, but it's being crammed down our throats. WHY?

The judges in America are in violation of the United States Constitution and they're getting away with it. WHY?

These are just three questions of many.

It's too late to change anything with politics because the politicians do NOT listen to the people.

Now, thats a big why and every citizen of this country should be asking it. As long as everybody just sits back and keeps quiet, the pols think we're all stupid. They would not let someone do to them what they are doing to us.

95 posted on 02/12/2004 4:47:38 PM PST by philetus (Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: *Homosexual Agenda; EdReform; scripter; GrandMoM; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping.

SF officials violate the law to further the "gay" agenda. Is this the shot heard round the world? If they want civil disobedience, conservatives should give them civil disobedience.

If anyone wants on or off this ping list, ping me!
96 posted on 02/12/2004 4:49:20 PM PST by little jeremiah (everyone is entitled to their opinion, but everyone isn't entitled to be right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
If homosexuals can marry, so can NAMBLA members. Instead of hunting down young boys, they will be able to legally adopt their sexual boy toys.

What a shame Kenneth Parnell was convicted of trying to buy a young boy earlier this week. If he had only had better timing...</sarcasm>

97 posted on 02/12/2004 4:52:48 PM PST by L.N. Smithee (Just because I don't think like you doesn't mean I don't think for myself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl
Repulsive degenerates. Biological errors.
98 posted on 02/12/2004 4:56:26 PM PST by ClearBlueSky (Whenever someone says it's not about Islam...it's about Islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
In that brief period between 1/20/01 and 9/11/01, this administration behaved much as it's doing lately. I struggle to find the right way to characterize what I see and sense, but can't articulate it well. It's almost a gauzy attempt at sweetness — aw, shucks, please like me, I'm a good guy. What in my childhood was called "hiding your light under a bushel."

I wonder if they have lost some self-confidence because the WMD have not been found. Whether or not that's the case, I wonder where this man is lately. I miss him:




99 posted on 02/12/2004 5:00:46 PM PST by Wolfstar (A self-confident cowboy nation, or a Kerrified nation. Your choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl
May God forgive them.
100 posted on 02/12/2004 5:01:28 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson