San Francisco Officials Marry Gay Couple

AP ^

[Zack Nguyen]

Therefore, no contract between a human and animal is valid.

Perhaps - but if the animal isn't harmed, then given the current arguments, there is really no reason not to allow open sex between the species. Disgusting, but that is where we are headed. Scalia made this argument in the LAwrence case.

[freeangel]

It's too bad other people in SF don't put up thousands of copies of the Big Ten all over city property in acts of "civil disobedience" as well.

[philetus]

The one I posted from

http://www.worldmag.com/world/issue/06-14-97/national_1.asp

This one has quotes

http://www.mistersf.com/notorious/index.html?notdavisbday.htm

[BurbankKarl]

Four percent of New York men ages 40-49 are HIV-positive

or

75,000 New Yorkers Have HIV/AIDS

Which headline do you prefer?

[jde1953]

"Perhaps - but if the animal isn't harmed, then given the current arguments, there is really no reason not to allow open sex between the species. Disgusting, but that is where we are headed."

Surprise! We are much closer than you may think, if not already there. In the state of Texas, bastion of the GOP and heart of the Bible belt, bestiality in public is a crime, but as long as you keep the barn door locked, you and old Bossie can have at it to your heart's content. See http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/statutes/pe/pe0002100.html#pe003.21.07 Pardon me if I don't hold my breath while waiting for howls of outrage about this moral degradation exhibited by the citizens of Texas.

[sergiod]

They can play whatever charades they like (such as pretending that a rectum is a sex organ), but they're not married unless the marriage is recognized by the State.

Or by God.

[Kahonek]

"If homosexual marriage passes, remember, NAMBLA members can marry and legally adopt their boy sex toys."

As opposed to now, when they can adopt without marrying?

[Wolfstar]

The outcome suggests that even in the most secularized, liberal city in the nation, citizens' patience has its limits, but the end has not yet been reached.

Wow! The article took my breath away. I'm a Californian, but live in the L.A. area. Had never heard of this story before. I fear the final sentence pretty much says it all about the state of our nation these days. IF so, among other things, I wouldn't expect President Bush to be reelected.

If the general public does not remember its fear in the immediate aftermath of 9/11; if it has not reached the limits of tolerance for sleaze and degradation of social mores; if it cannot connect its own dots between the anthrax attacks and the reason we went into Iraq; if it does not recognize the danger of putting yet another 60's era radical into the White House, then perhaps the nation will deserve what it gets.

I know I'm probably being too gloomy, but there is something worrisome in the air about this election lately. Aside from all the carping from the right, the White House doesn't seem to be in fighting trim for the campaign. One can rarely expect a show of strength from Congressional Republicans, but where's the spunk from the White House? For example, they've allowed themselves to be baited into responding to the insulting and entirely phony National Guard flap, and are dealing with it on the Dems' terms. It's a no-win situation, because there will never be enough "evidence" to quiet the Dems and their media shills now that the White House has dignified their thoroughly manufactured "scandal." I don't know. As I said, maybe I'm just too gloomy right now.

[Agnes Heep]

That goes without saying. I was simply referring to the temporal niceties.

[scripter]

Ping. Seen this one yet?

[My2Cents]

I agree with you about disquiet regarding the election. I'm convinced that this election is GW Bush's, and the Republicans', to lose. Which means that if they don't kick it into gear soon, it could be lost. Most bothersome is that there's about 10% of the electorate that has no real convictions one way or another regarding the candidates, and they sway back and forth, depending on the impressions of the last news cycle, from one camp to the next. Yesterday, they were with Bush; today, they're with Kerry; tomorrow, who knows? This is why, I think, the news media concentrates on such trivial matters -- they know that trivial concerns, images, sound bites, the furrowed brow or a lifted eyebrow from Peter Jennings can sway this group of the squishy middle.

I'm convinced that the majority of people trust GW Bush. They believe him. They give him the benefit of the doubt. They want him to win. But if the White House comes out with a weak response to something, shows a hit of doubt or confusion, allows itself to get sucked into something shallow like the ANG story, the people's confidence in Bush will be shaken.

The nation cannot afford a Kerry in the White House. I fear for the nation if he, or someone of his ilk, wins. The Bush people have everything on their side -- the economy, the progress in Iraq, the steady progress in the war on terror. They should be knocking the Dems back on their heels, but they are not. This is what concerns me. It's still only February, so there is plenty of time to kick this thing in gear. I hope they start soon.

[Destructor]

"...a spokesperson for the city also announced that the city would be changing it's name to Thaan Fwancithco."

[Destructor]

I would like to comment on these pictures, but I'm pretty sure the Lead Moderator would ban me from Free Republic, if I did.

[leprechaun9]

My question still is: "Has anyone been required to show proof of marriage to the IRS to qualify for the MARRIED status on a 1040 return?"

[philetus]

then perhaps the nation will deserve what it gets.

It's not the "nation" that is at fault.
Homos are a very small minority, but they are running roughshod over the American people. WHY?

The majority of the American people don't want amnesties and uncontrolled illegal immegration, but it's being crammed down our throats. WHY?

The judges in America are in violation of the United States Constitution and they're getting away with it. WHY?

These are just three questions of many.

It's too late to change anything with politics because the politicians do NOT listen to the people.

Now, thats a big why and every citizen of this country should be asking it. As long as everybody just sits back and keeps quiet, the pols think we're all stupid. They would not let someone do to them what they are doing to us.

[little jeremiah]

Homosexual Agenda Ping.

SF officials violate the law to further the "gay" agenda. Is this the shot heard round the world? If they want civil disobedience, conservatives should give them civil disobedience.

If anyone wants on or off this ping list, ping me!

[L.N. Smithee]

If homosexuals can marry, so can NAMBLA members. Instead of hunting down young boys, they will be able to legally adopt their sexual boy toys.

What a shame Kenneth Parnell was convicted of trying to buy a young boy earlier this week. If he had only had better timing...</sarcasm>

[ClearBlueSky]

Repulsive degenerates. Biological errors.

[Wolfstar]

In that brief period between 1/20/01 and 9/11/01, this administration behaved much as it's doing lately. I struggle to find the right way to characterize what I see and sense, but can't articulate it well. It's almost a gauzy attempt at sweetness — aw, shucks, please like me, I'm a good guy. What in my childhood was called "hiding your light under a bushel."

I wonder if they have lost some self-confidence because the WMD have not been found. Whether or not that's the case, I wonder where this man is lately. I miss him:

[Salvation]

May God forgive them.