Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/12/2004 10:05:08 AM PST by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]



2 posted on 02/12/2004 10:06:35 AM PST by presidio9 (Libertarians need to grow up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9

HURRAH!


3 posted on 02/12/2004 10:08:53 AM PST by kimmie7 (We're going to Boston in March. Can a Southerner LIVE 3 days without sweet tea? Pray for Jacob!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
Already posted here http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1076020/posts
4 posted on 02/12/2004 10:10:52 AM PST by AuH2ORepublican (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
10th amendment BUMP
6 posted on 02/12/2004 10:11:27 AM PST by CounterCounterCulture (Remember, name and town, name and town, if you wish to opine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
God bless South Dakota. Keep forcing the courts to strike it down, and make sure the judges see the 4D ultrasound images every step of the way. The judges owe those children sentenced to death the courtesy of at least looking them in the eye before their execution.
7 posted on 02/12/2004 10:17:33 AM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
Thank You South Dakota and SD FReepers!
9 posted on 02/12/2004 10:23:43 AM PST by WinOne4TheGipper (Formerly will1776.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
"The bill requires physicians to make every effort to preserve the life of both the mother and her unborn child."

So that means that it does not outlaw abortions, just unnecessary ones.
10 posted on 02/12/2004 10:23:47 AM PST by looscnnn (Tell me something, it's still "We the people", right? -- Megadeth (Peace Sells))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
This is extraordinarily poor timing. First of all, an injunction from a Federal court will follow almost immediately. Not one, I say again, not one innocent life will be saved. Secondly, at a time when conservatives and Republicans are finally starting to gain some ground on social issues (e.g. homosexual marriage, Pledge of Allegiance/Boy Scout banning and TV nudity and violence), this comes along so that the Democrats can show the women of America how "under threat" their "reproductive"/abortion rights are. Ideologically wonderful, but in practical terms: STUPID, STUPID, STUPID!
11 posted on 02/12/2004 10:24:59 AM PST by pawdoggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
In case anyone is interested in the teaching of the Catholic Church on this matter: It is the duty of every legislature to pass a law outlawing abortion, and imposing a penalty for performing abortions, one that is commensurate with the crime of homicide. It is also the duty of every governor and D.A. to enforce such laws. It is also the duty of every police officer to behave in a manner that acknowledges that people are murdered in abortion clinics--i.e., it is a crime for a governor, judge, a prosecutor, or a police officer to arrest or impede or frustrate efforts by citizens to protect innocent life that is in peril.

All decisions by any court, and all acts by any legislature, which have as their purpose marking out some segment of the human population as not entitled to protection from homicide, are null. The duties of all public officials, whether legislators, executives, or judges, are unaffected by any law, court order, or judicial decision, which purports to authorize the commission of homicide.

The fact that no bishop in the United States has said anything resembling the above since April 1973 does not alter the fact that this is the moral law.

13 posted on 02/12/2004 10:32:48 AM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
Realistically, if this passes, the pro-infanticide crowd will have a lawsuit barring implementation signed by one of their per judges before the ink is dry.
15 posted on 02/12/2004 10:34:54 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
I'm very pleased to hear that this passed! It's a good message to send that there are still states that are poised to outlaw such an abhorrent practice as abortion.
19 posted on 02/12/2004 10:38:10 AM PST by No Dems 2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
House Bill 1191, sponsored by Rep. Matt McCaulley, says the legislature determined that based on the best scientific and medical evidence, life begins at fertilization

If this is what the bill says, then it is also outlawing some forms of contraception like the pill.

23 posted on 02/12/2004 10:50:40 AM PST by Between the Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dansangel
PING
30 posted on 02/12/2004 11:31:41 AM PST by .45MAN (this page written on recyclable media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
GO FIGURE!!

SD: State House passes bill outlawing abortion

However, PRO-Choice and Emily LIST sponsored Herseth is leading the GOP dude by 29%



SD CD election in


SD house JUNE 1,04
Herseth 58% - Diedrich 29%
13% undecided
MAson Dixon - MOE+/- 3.5% (02/07/04)
http://www.argusleader.com/update/Wednesdayarticle4.shtml
43 posted on 02/12/2004 1:40:45 PM PST by KQQL (@)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
Does anyone know what penalty this law provides for the principal perpetrator (the aborting woman)? I didn't see it mentioned in the article.
44 posted on 02/12/2004 1:55:10 PM PST by BearArms
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
Bad timing. Very bad timing.
52 posted on 02/12/2004 4:21:01 PM PST by Destructor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
Wonderful news, may other states follow suit and also strike down homosexual "marriage" as well.
63 posted on 02/12/2004 7:16:18 PM PST by Libertina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
I have notice that in many states the lower house of the legislature is much more "conservative" than is the upper house. Is this also true in SD, where Democrats are now favored to control the U.S. House seat and both U.S. Senate seats this year? Sometimes a state House will pass something, knowing that the state Senate will kill it. Even the old Dirksen Amendment to restore school prayer used to pass the House with the 2/3 majority but was always blocked by "moderates" in the U.S. Senate from both parties. SD is very liberal when it comes to U.S. House and Senate; perhaps the conservatism there is limited to the state House. Also, is the governor there "conservative" enough to sign such legislation? He may veto on grounds that he does not want the state to go to the expense of defending the law in court.
72 posted on 02/13/2004 1:06:05 PM PST by Theodore R. (When will they ever learn?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson