The deliberate creation of human beings for the purpose of destroying them in order to 'benefit' others is an indescribably hideous evil. Here they created 30 human beings and then they killed them. The hubris of these scientists who experiment on other human beings makes me wonder who actually won WWII. They think they are immune from any restraint of moral law, and from future judgment.
1 posted on
02/12/2004 7:26:54 AM PST by
Diamond
To: MHGinTN
You may want to ping your list on this story.
Cordially,
2 posted on
02/12/2004 8:30:57 AM PST by
Diamond
To: Diamond
Thanks for posting this article.
I can't believe that anyone would be in favor of using over 232 human oocytes to create 30 human embryos for the purpose of harvesting their parts - and killing them in the process. Well, maybe the butchers who buy and sell the kidneys of poor people in India and South America, but no one else.
3 posted on
02/12/2004 1:41:20 PM PST by
hocndoc
(Choice is the # 1 killer in the US)
To: Diamond
Sad.
6 posted on
02/12/2004 8:17:22 PM PST by
jwalsh07
To: Diamond
God is pissed.
7 posted on
02/12/2004 8:20:21 PM PST by
Saundra Duffy
(For victory & freedom!!!)
To: Diamond
This is, quite simply, the farming of human beings. Like livestock, they are bred for parts. Many can look past this because it's just little tiny cells that don't look like much. Notice how most articles about this make clear "this is not cloning to make babies." Cloning for medical parts is so much more civilized, isn't it? Well, 25 years from now these same scientists will promise miracle cures "if only we let the clones reach 8 weeks... 3 months... 4 months". Sadly, you can hear people using the same justifications to kill a 4 month old cloned human as a 4 day old one. After all, they're just clones, right? They weren't cloned for the purpose of making a baby, ergo they aren't really human.
8 posted on
02/12/2004 8:25:28 PM PST by
workerbee
To: Diamond
Evil without conscience.
9 posted on
02/12/2004 8:28:20 PM PST by
185JHP
( "The wicked walk on every side, when the vilest men are exalted.")
To: Diamond
Just last year S Kor researchers said they wouldn't do this. There is sone kind of ethical law prohibiting it. Now they are going ahead anyway citing a superior ethical law. The arguments on both sides are weak. It seems the judgements are being made on Kierkegaard's first and lowest level, the aesthetic level. The next level, the ethical level, is the midlevel. We're not on the midlevel, yet.
12 posted on
02/13/2004 10:00:25 AM PST by
RightWhale
(Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
To: Diamond; 2nd amendment mama; A2J; Agitate; Alouette; Annie03; aposiopetic; attagirl; axel f; ...
ProLife Ping! If anyone wants on or off my ProLife Ping List, please notify me here or by freepmail.
15 posted on
02/13/2004 11:27:33 AM PST by
Mr. Silverback
(Pre-empt the third murder attempt-- Pray for Terry Schiavo!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson