Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Diamond
Just last year S Kor researchers said they wouldn't do this. There is sone kind of ethical law prohibiting it. Now they are going ahead anyway citing a superior ethical law. The arguments on both sides are weak. It seems the judgements are being made on Kierkegaard's first and lowest level, the aesthetic level. The next level, the ethical level, is the midlevel. We're not on the midlevel, yet.
12 posted on 02/13/2004 10:00:25 AM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RightWhale
The arguments on both sides are weak. It seems the judgements are being made on Kierkegaard's first and lowest level, the aesthetic level. The next level, the ethical level, is the midlevel. We're not on the midlevel, yet.

Please elaborate. I'm not sure what you mean by the arguments on both sides, or to whom the "we" refers. Are you referring just to the S. Koreans?

Cordially,

13 posted on 02/13/2004 10:57:33 AM PST by Diamond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson