To: Diamond
Just last year S Kor researchers said they wouldn't do this. There is sone kind of ethical law prohibiting it. Now they are going ahead anyway citing a superior ethical law. The arguments on both sides are weak. It seems the judgements are being made on Kierkegaard's first and lowest level, the aesthetic level. The next level, the ethical level, is the midlevel. We're not on the midlevel, yet.
12 posted on
02/13/2004 10:00:25 AM PST by
RightWhale
(Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
To: RightWhale
The arguments on both sides are weak. It seems the judgements are being made on Kierkegaard's first and lowest level, the aesthetic level. The next level, the ethical level, is the midlevel. We're not on the midlevel, yet.Please elaborate. I'm not sure what you mean by the arguments on both sides, or to whom the "we" refers. Are you referring just to the S. Koreans?
Cordially,
13 posted on
02/13/2004 10:57:33 AM PST by
Diamond
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson