Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

High marks for Bunning (62% approval rating)
The Courier-Journal ^ | February 11, 2004 | Al Cross

Posted on 02/11/2004 7:57:42 PM PST by Republican Wildcat

Kentucky voters like Republican Jim Bunning and the job he is doing as a first-term U.S. senator, but he has yet to cinch re-election, according to The Courier-Journal's latest Bluegrass Poll.

Forty-one percent of likely voters in the Nov. 4 election said they would vote to re-elect Bunning, and only 13 percent said they would vote to replace him. Nineteen percent said they would consider voting for someone else, and 27 percent said they didn't know or were undecided.

The error margin of the poll, which surveyed 658 likely voters by telephone from Jan. 30 through Feb. 4, is 3.8 percentage points.

A score of 41 percent on re-election is about average for most senators, but 27 percent undecided is relatively high, said Jennifer Duffy, who watches Senate races for the Cook Political Report, a nonpartisan Washington newsletter.

"That is the number Bunning should be concerned about, and that should give Democrats a little bit of hope," Duffy said. But she said the 13 percent vote to replace "says that Bunning is not a polarizing figure."

Likely voters who have a favorable impression of Bunning outnumbered those who have an unfavorable impression by a margin of 2 to 1. By almost 4 to 1, they approved of the job Bunning is doing. Three-fourths of those who approved said they approved somewhat, while the rest said they approved strongly.

Both parties have primary elections for the Senate on May 18, but neither appears to be competitive.

Bunning, a former House member and major league baseball pitcher from Southgate, is opposed by former state Sen. Barry Metcalf of Richmond, who got 26 percent of the vote against Bunning in 1998.

The Democratic primary pits perennial candidate and party-switcher David Lynn Williams of Glasgow, who is not running an active campaign, against Daniel Mongiardo, a state senator from Hazard whom the national Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee endorsed two weeks before the Jan. 27 candidate-filing deadline.

The poll found that only 11 percent of likely voters said they had read or heard anything about Mongiardo, who acknowledges that he must accelerate his fund-raising to have a chance against Bunning.

Mongiardo raised only $100,905 through Dec. 31. With $206,000 in loans from himself, he had $268,875 in the bank. Bunning's year-end balance was more than $3.2million.

Mongiardo's personal financial disclosure, which lists assets and liabilities in ranges of values, shows that his net worth is between $1.6million and $3.5million, not including any residential mortgages, installment loans or other debts that do not have to be listed.

Mongiardo's longtime consultant, Kim Geveden of Lexington, noted that his client did not start raising money until Nov. 5. Geveden said Mongiardo did well, considering the holidays and "the low spirits of Democrats on the heels of the governor's election," which they lost for the first time in 36 years.

Geveden said the poll "is an independent confirmation of what we've been saying," that Bunning is vulnerable. "Our challenge is to raise the money, and Daniel's going to raise the money."

Mongiardo, a surgeon, declined to say how much more he is willing or able to lend his campaign. "We're going to do whatever it takes to make people understand I'm the person to solve the problems we face today," he said.

Bunning said the poll results are very similar to a survey taken for him a year ago. He said that when he ran for governor in 1983, his first poll also showed him with 11 percent name recognition, the same as Mongiardo has now, "so we're gonna work like hell." As GOP nominee against Martha Layne Collins in 1983, Bunning got 44 percent of the vote.

Duffy said that the poll indicates that voters' knowledge of Bunning "is a bit shallow," partly because only 75 percent said they had read or heard about him although he has been in Congress since 1987.

When Kentucky's other senator, Republican Mitch McConnell, first sought re-election in 1990, his name recognition in a Bluegrass Poll that April was 80 percent.

In the latest poll, Bunning was less known in Western Kentucky than the rest of the state. That part of the state, which once had a strong Democratic heritage, is increasingly voting Republican, making it the key region for statewide GOP victories in recent years.

In another swing territory, the 6th Congressional District, Bunning had lower re-elect and job-approval scores than in the rest of the state.

Though he is an outspoken Republican, Bunning showed strength among many Democrats. Thirty percent of people who said they identified with the Democratic Party said they would vote to re-elect him, as did 36 percent of registered Democrats. His job rating among both Democratic groups was more than 2 to 1 favorable.

The poll did not identify Bunning as a Republican and did not ask respondents directly whether they would vote for him or Mongiardo, who was not identified as a Democrat or a state senator.

Feelings about Bunning were linked to partisan allegiance and opinion of President Bush.

Among those who approved of Bush's job performance, a bare majority said they would vote to re-elect Bunning. Those who disapproved were about evenly divided between re-election, replacement, considering someone else and undecided.

Virginia Griffin, 67, of Louisville, a retired teacher, said Bush is the main reason she would vote to re-elect Bunning, for whom she voted in 1998.

"I support President Bush and I want to see him through this crisis we're in, so I will probably support his Republican Party," said Griffin, a registered Democrat who said she feels closer to the GOP.

But John Thomas, 66, of Louisville, a retired construction engineer, said he strongly disapproves of Bunning because "he's a George Bush yes-man."

Thomas, a Democrat, said he hadn't heard of Mongiardo but would vote for any Democrat for senator "unless he had such a poor track record."

Both Griffin and Thomas were poll respondents who agreed to interviews.

The poll showed a gender gap. On re-election and favorability, Bunning did noticeably better among men than he did among women, though there was no difference between the sexes in his job-approval rating.

In Jefferson County, 37 percent of likely voters said they would vote to re-elect Bunning, 22 percent said they would consider someone else, 16 percent said they would vote to replace him and 26 percent said they were undecided or didn't know. His job rating in the county was 64 percent approval and 17 percent disapproval. The error margin for the Jefferson County results was 8.9 percentage points.


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Kentucky
KEYWORDS: 2004; approvalrating; bunning; electionussenate; mongiardo

1 posted on 02/11/2004 7:57:45 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
Interesting that Bunning's approval ratings are a bit better in Jefferson County than the state as a whole. Jefferson County is considerably more Dem than the state as a whole. Bush narrrowly lost, while thumping Gore state wide by a near historic margin for a Pubbie.
2 posted on 02/11/2004 8:03:46 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Frankly, this speaks well for Alice Forgy Kerr's chances as well...becoming an increasingly Pubbie state...
3 posted on 02/11/2004 8:14:38 PM PST by Keith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Torie; Pubbie; ambrose; JohnnyZ
@
4 posted on 02/11/2004 8:17:14 PM PST by KQQL (@)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keith
KY 06 UPDATE:




Democrats say that Chandler is still leading, but some privately acknowledge they’re seeing the same trend as their Republican opponents are, and they’re not taking Tuesday’s election for granted. After all, in the Bush age, we’re seeing this law of political physics at work: What goes up, must come down. And vice versa.

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/4242759/
5 posted on 02/11/2004 8:19:21 PM PST by KQQL (@)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat; F16Fighter
Bunning's a conservative's conservative -- no Rino blood in his veins. And his 3.27 lifetime ERA is impressive as well, as are his 224 wins.
6 posted on 02/11/2004 8:20:58 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Geveden said the poll "is an independent confirmation of what we've been saying," that Bunning is vulnerable. "Our challenge is to raise the money, and Daniel's going to raise the money."

ROFL!

"There are no American infidels in Baghdad. Never!" "My feelings - as usual - we will slaughter them all" "Our initial assessment is that they will all die" "I blame Al-Jazeera - they are marketing for the Americans!"

http://www.welovetheiraqiinformationminister.com/

7 posted on 02/11/2004 8:22:16 PM PST by JohnnyZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Torie
That's a rather high margin of error, so I doubt it is that high. Still, it is obviously well above 50%, which is very good for a Republican.
8 posted on 02/11/2004 8:25:35 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Keith
Unfortunately, I am afraid Kerr will loose next week. She does seem to be closing the gap, but even local polls this week show her down around 7 points. She just has not run a very good campaign. It has been very negative, and Chandler has done a better job with his commercials. He does have name recognition. I will be voting on Tuesday, and hoping turnout may be enough to make it up. This district has been republican for about 10 years now. So we'll see. I really hate to loose one right here.
9 posted on 02/11/2004 8:26:39 PM PST by gswilder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
David Williams' nomination is going to sort of throw a wrench in their plans. I truly believe he's going to win. He has the more familiar sounding name. The name "Mongiardo" won't fly unless he spends about all of his cash in the primary. I am telling everyone I know that is still registered Dem to vote for Williams in the primary.

Williams won handily the Dem nomination for the 2nd Congressional district against Ron Lewis. Lewis defeated him with more than 70% of the vote.
10 posted on 02/11/2004 8:29:16 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: gswilder
She's run one of the best campaigns in history. Overcoming Ben's name ID and longer history in the district will make defeating him very challenging, but she has pulled pretty much even with him and he is trending downward. Being within single digits of him is an incredible accomplishment and is a clear sign as to how well she has campaigned.

She outraised him more than 2 to 1 and has a better base of support on the ground. Turnout is the key to who is on top on election day.
11 posted on 02/11/2004 8:35:37 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
David Williams' nomination is going to sort of throw a wrench in their plans. I truly believe he's going to win

That would be hilarious. Mongiardo DOES have until May 18th to get the word out, about 3 months. And he'll get more free media (presumably) than the Republican AG candidates did last year when Wood(?) won.

12 posted on 02/11/2004 8:36:30 PM PST by JohnnyZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
Yes, but so did Lois Combs Weinberg...and she was also heavily backed by the Dem establishment (Patton, etc.) which no longer exists. She spend hundreds of thousands of $$$ on TV ads and she won the nomination by a fraction of a percent in 2002 against Tom Barlow, who spend about $1000.

In Williams gets the nomination, Bunning could be in the running to defeat McConnell's record for highest vote % for a Republican in Kentucky statewide.
13 posted on 02/11/2004 8:52:18 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: aCDNinUSA; AFMobster; anoldafvet; Apache48; aposiopetic; April19; asformeandformyhouse; ...
BLUEGRASS BUMP
14 posted on 02/11/2004 9:15:21 PM PST by RonPaulLives
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
A score of 41 percent on re-election is about average for most senators, but 27 percent undecided is relatively high

What is this supposed to mean? If 41% is normal for re-elect numbers, than how is 27% undecided bad for him? I would think that's good...the other thing it could be is people wanting to vote against him, right? Surely that's not better.

15 posted on 02/11/2004 9:18:38 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
A score of 41 percent on re-election is about average for most senators, but 27 percent undecided is relatively high

I think the gist is that the 27% is A) unusual and B) the only straw Dems have to grasp at. I guess they figure, "at least they're undecided and not in FAVOR of Bunning".

Weinberg, an education activist from eastern Kentucky and the daughter of the late Gov. Bert Combs, spent about $600,000 during the primary, much of it in a late rush of television commercials. Barlow, who runs a small business in Paducah, spent $6,000, most of it on postage and gas for his van.

I'd be surprised if Mongiardo spent as much as 600k in the primary, and he doesn't have the Combs family name. You may be onto something!

16 posted on 02/11/2004 9:24:27 PM PST by JohnnyZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
I know Bunning could come here (to Pennsylvania) and get elected to the Senate if he wanted to. EVERYBODY who is over 50 remembers his perfect game against the Mets on Father's Day, 1964. And these are people who VOTE.
17 posted on 02/11/2004 9:35:01 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

18 posted on 02/11/2004 9:39:39 PM PST by Charles Henrickson (As a kid in Chicago, I saw Bunning pitch against my Cubs many times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Charles Henrickson
Thanks for that!
I still have my 1964 Phillies yearbook (second edition) with Bunning on the cover and the other eight players from the perfect game in little circles surrounding him.
19 posted on 02/11/2004 9:43:18 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
"Bunning's a conservative's conservative -- no Rino blood in his veins. And his 3.27 lifetime ERA is impressive as well, as are his 224 wins."

Bunning is still great then?

I'd like to see him fire a high and hard one that "just got away" somewhere in the area of Kerry's neck-bolts (heh-heh).

20 posted on 02/12/2004 9:23:17 AM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson