 AP Photo
|
||||
|
Posted on 02/11/2004 3:55:02 PM PST by Howlin
WASHINGTON - Under attack by House Democrats, Secretary of State Colin Powell (news - web sites) said Wednesday he was surprised U.N. and American inspectors did not find storehouses of hidden weapons in Iraq (news - web sites).
|
||||||||||||||||
But Powell told the International Relations Committee that "we presented what we believed the truth to be at the time."
Powell testified that President Saddam Hussein (news - web sites)'s apparent intent to develop and use weapons, his record of gassing his own people and his defiance of the United Nations (news - web sites) all were — and remain — valid reasons for going to war to overthrow him.
He said President Bush (news - web sites) and he had relied on intelligence provided by CIA (news - web sites) Director George Tenet, and the only serious question raised about the analysis since the war was whether Iraq had storehouses of weapons of mass destruction.
"I don't think anyone in America should think that President Bush cooked the books," Powell said.
"The reason we told you there were stockpiles there was because we believed it to be true," Powell said. "We were surprised when they did not turn up."
But Reps. Gary Ackerman, D-N.Y., Robert Melendez, D-N.J., Rep. Robert I Wexler, D-Fla., and Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, challenged Powell about the administration's case, suggesting it may have been misleading from the outset.
"Truth is the first casualty of war," Ackerman said. "I would contend truth was murdered before a shot was fired."
"We went into this war under false premises," Melendez said.
Wexler told Powell he considered him to be "the credible voice in the administration."
"When you reached the conclusion that Iraq represented a clear and present danger to the United States, that meant a lot to me," Wexler said. "But the facts suggest there was a part of the story that was not true."
Powell fielded the assertions calmly, defending the president's judgment and his own.
But when Brown contrasted Powell's military experience to Bush's record with the National Guard, saying the president "may have been AWOL" from duty, Powell exploded.
"First of all, Mr. Brown, I won't dignify your comments about the president because you don't know what you are talking about," Powell snapped.
"I'm sorry I don't know what you mean, Mr. Secretary," Brown replied.
"You made reference to the president," Powell shot back.
Brown then repeated his understanding that Bush may have been AWOL from guard duty.
"Mr. Brown, let's not go there," Powell retorted. "Let's not go there in this hearing. If you want to have a political fight on this matter, that is very controversial, and I think it is being dealt with by the White House, fine, but let's not go there."
Powell then went on to defend the Bush administration's assertions on Iraq's prewar weaponry. "We didn't make it up," Powell said. "It was information that reflected the views of analysts in all the various agencies."
But the dispute with Brown did not end.
"Are you shaking your head for something, young man?," Powell asked when he noticed an aide to Brown apparently disagreeing.
"I seldom come to a meeting when I'm talking to a congressman and I have people aligned behind you giving editorial comment by headshakes," Powell said.
Brown, defending his assistant, said "I think people have opinions."
Eager to move on, the committee chairman, Rep. Henry Hyde, R-Ill., observed that "we're on a very emotional subject," but "we've been doing swimmingly until now."
Dems have no respect.
Becki
"Brown, who delivered the keynote address at the anti-Bush rally, told The Hill that the rally was scheduled to take place at a park near Bush’s event. But Brown said the U.S. Secret Service informed him Friday afternoon that the rally would be moved to a state recreational center farther away.
A White House spokesman said the Secret Service made the decision because of security concerns.
But Brown discounted that. “It’s just a way to harass opponents. This is the most secretive White House we’ve ever seen. The White House does not brook dissent,” he said."
I see many hear are happy about this, as I am. But, if things follow the historical pattern over the past few years, this newfound backbone and challenging of the Democrats will be another one time deal.
The Senate Republicans are cowards and have no backbone to fight and the Dems know that. The pubbies are scared that if they start firing back, as did Powell, they will be vilified by the Dems as "partisan, combative, not willing to work together", etc., etc.
Plus, as we all know, the Senate Republicans are more concerned with getting negative press from the NYTMSNBCWPABCCBSPBSLAT than to stand up and FIGHT.
Yes, Mr. Powell showed great strength today. I will not hold my breath to see if any of this will rub off on the Senate Republicans.
Naturally.
1-877-762-8762
My own congresscritter. He's even dumber than he looks.
This is SO good on SO many levels. It's good that Powell reacted--and reacted as he did. We can't let this stand any longer.
And, it's good that the President's team is exploding...and not the President.
Thanks for the "ping", Howlin!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
!["Some Ohio Republican lawmakers had misgivings about the planning for President George W. Bush’s Labor Day [2003] speech to union members near Cleveland but say the White House did not address their concerns."](http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=www.hillnews.com/photos/090303/brown%2520sherrod%2520web.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.hillnews.com/news/090303/dark.aspx&h=233&w=168&sz=18&tbnid=p-sj9YlrhisJ:&tbnh=102&tbnw=74&prev=/images%3Fq%3D%2522Sherrod%2BBrown%2522%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%26sa%3DG<i){kind=link}