Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ignored for Decades, Insect Fossil Is Declared World's Oldest
New York Times ^ | February 11, 2004 | CAROL KAESUK YOON

Posted on 02/11/2004 11:37:29 AM PST by 68skylark

Scientists say they have discovered the world's oldest known insect fossil — a 400 million-year-old set of minuscule jaws that lay unrecognized for nearly a century in a lonely drawer at the Natural History Museum in London.

The findings, being published on Thursday in the journal Nature, pushes the date for the appearance of insects, one of the most successful life forms on earth, some 10 million to 20 million years back in the fossil record. And they suggest that insects were among the first animals to live on land.

Advertisement

The authors also argue that these ancient insects flew. If true, that would mean that flight — one of life's most important and vigorously investigated evolutionary innovations — evolved much earlier than suspected, 70 million years before the oldest fossilized insect wing. Scientists say the finding puts insects, already recognized as the earliest animal fliers, up in the air a good 170 million years before anything else, even flying dinosaurs.

"We were at the museum to look at another famous insect fossil, one that everyone's been discussing for the past 80 years," said Dr. David Grimaldi, a curator of entomology at the American Museum of Natural History, who co-wrote the paper with Dr. Michael S. Engel, a paleoentomologist at the University of Kansas. But the two could not resist examining the other, curious fragment stored in the same drawer, a curious bit of fossil that had long ago been dismissed as being of little interest. Dr. Grimaldi said, "We looked at each other and said, `Holy Moley!' "

Dr. William Shear, a paleobiologist at Hampden-Sydney College in Virginia, who is a discoverer of what had been considered the oldest insect fossils, said of the new claim: "It's a very convincing case. These guys were smart enough to come and along and re-analyze these things and they took a look and they got the goods."

Perhaps other scientists can be forgiven for having missed the significance of this fossil, dubbed Rhyniognatha early in the last century. Its jaws measure less than one-two-hundred-fiftieth of an inch across. Embedded in a partly translucent crystalline rock, known as chert, from Rhynie, Scotland, such fossils can only be clearly seen when the chert is cut with diamond saws, polished and then examined under a powerful microscope.

Under bright lights and high magnification, the jaw fragments exhibit several telltale features — including sockets that form part of a hingelike mechanism — that clearly identify them as the mouth parts of a true insect. But this oldest known insect fossil is not, a member of the most primitive lineage of insects. Instead, the authors say, based on the stoutness and other subtler features of these jaws, which look like the tips of two tiny bird wings, Rhyniognatha is part a lineage of more advanced insects.

"So that means that everything that diversified prior to that must have been older than that fossil," said Dr. Engel. If so, it would push the origin of insects back into the dim shadows of the Silurian period, more than 400 million years ago, when plants were just edging up onto land, followed by the first animals. He added, "So they were among the earliest of terrestrial faunas."

Because the jaws appear to place the fossil species among lineages of insects that exhibit well-developed wings, the authors expressed confidence that little Rhyniognatha could indeed fly. But Dr. Shear called that conclusion "a bit shakier," saying that it could be possible for such jaws to evolve without flight. While the results were very suggestive of flight, he said, the study lacks "a smoking gun, or smoking wing."

So until Rhyniognatha's tiny body is found in the Scottish chert or other ancient fliers are uncovered, scientists will probably continue to debate the date of the origin of animal flight. Researchers expressed hope that the new finding would get paleontologists digging into this crucial chapter in the history of life. Even now a Scottish team of scientists has begun excavating the Rhynie chert for new fossil flora and fauna.

"There are jackpots out there waiting to be grabbed hold of," Dr. Engel said.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
Even though I'm highly critical of the Times reporting on matters of politics, the economy and national security, I gotta say that many of their stories on other topics (like science) are just great. There are two sides to my love-hate feelings for the Times!
1 posted on 02/11/2004 11:37:31 AM PST by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
Hmmm. So Hillary has now been bumped to second place...
2 posted on 02/11/2004 11:43:44 AM PST by Coop ("Hero" is the last four-letter word I'd use to describe John Kerry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
I used to enjoy their Science, Arts, Sunday Crossword, and the rest, but I cannot, in good conscience, support these lefties by buying their paper. I cancelled my subscription about 15 years ago.
3 posted on 02/11/2004 11:44:57 AM PST by TruthShallSetYouFree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark

4 posted on 02/11/2004 12:00:01 PM PST by keithtoo (W '04 - I'll pass on the ketchup-boy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Old fossil ping!
5 posted on 02/11/2004 12:01:49 PM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
Because the jaws appear to place the fossil species among lineages of insects that exhibit well-developed wings, the authors expressed confidence that little Rhyniognatha could indeed fly.

Based on the jaw, I'd say this insect could fly.
Excuse me?
Well, you see, many insects with jaws like this, can fly.
And such insects, you maintain, evolve over time?
Most certainly!
The jaws evolve, the ability to fly evolves. I see. Tell me, what makes you think that these jaws indicate that the ability to fly had already evolved in this particular instance? Couldn't the jaws have come first, and flight second? Or not at all?
Well, yes. We said it was shakier. We don't know for sure.
So, you're making a guess? A great leap based on woefully incomplete information? And this is science?
Well, it brings in the grant money!

6 posted on 02/11/2004 12:03:08 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (The only reason I don't question Kerry's patriotism is because I know it doesn't exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: keithtoo
I'm holding you responsible for the cleaning bill for the Coke that flew out of my nose onto my keyboard. I'll send you the bill.
7 posted on 02/11/2004 12:18:37 PM PST by mlbford2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
YEC INTREP - Dating methods?
8 posted on 02/11/2004 12:25:07 PM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%
You think the whole list should be pinged for this thread?
9 posted on 02/11/2004 12:38:19 PM PST by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
actually, their facts on scientific matters are as dubious as any of their other news items. The earliest Trilobites are thought to have existed in the Cambrian Period, which would date back to about 543 million years--but what's a few hundred million years among friends?
10 posted on 02/11/2004 12:40:06 PM PST by richardtavor (Pray for the peace of Jerusalem in the name of the G-d of Jacob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
"some ten million to twenty million years". Gee only a small margin of ten million years! These guys really slay me. Evolution my ass.
11 posted on 02/11/2004 12:50:48 PM PST by fish hawk ("I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it any more")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Well, it brings in the grant money!

And the beat goes on.


12 posted on 02/11/2004 1:00:21 PM PST by Michael_Michaelangelo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Based on this picture, does the animal fly around in a UFO, brachiate through trees, or does he walk around on hooves?

Many animals exhibit this particular characteristic. Is it reasonable to make assumptions as to it's mode of mobility, based on what we see other animals with this same trait?

13 posted on 02/11/2004 1:10:18 PM PST by Jim Cane (Vote Tancredo in '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jim Cane
Hey! Stop joking! You mean to tell me that from this:


You can't tell the little buggers flew? C'mon!

Source: University of Aberdeen

14 posted on 02/11/2004 1:17:58 PM PST by Michael_Michaelangelo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Michael_Michaelangelo
I'm a paleo conservative, not a paleo entymologist, but I bet if you talked to one of the latter, they'd say, "yep, all flying insects have a puss that looks just like that."

Sure, it represents the logical fallicy of arguing from the general to the specific, but betting men like those odds.

15 posted on 02/11/2004 1:52:19 PM PST by Jim Cane (Vote Tancredo in '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: fish hawk
Well, an error of 10-20 million years out of 400 million years is only 2.5% to 5%. That doesn't sound too bad to me -- that's lots better accuracy than I get in my job as an actuary!
16 posted on 02/11/2004 2:20:15 PM PST by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: richardtavor
I think the article was talking about the earliest insects, not the earliest animals. A 400 million year old insect is quite a discovery, I think.
17 posted on 02/11/2004 2:22:00 PM PST by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
I guess it depends on how things are going at home. ;)
18 posted on 02/12/2004 8:28:44 AM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
A trilobite would be akin to a modern day beetle, so I think the point is correct.
19 posted on 02/12/2004 11:58:12 AM PST by richardtavor (Pray for the peace of Jerusalem in the name of the G-d of Jacob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 68skylark
A trilobite would be akin to a modern day beetle, so I think the point is correct.
20 posted on 02/12/2004 11:58:32 AM PST by richardtavor (Pray for the peace of Jerusalem in the name of the G-d of Jacob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson