1 posted on
02/10/2004 9:28:48 PM PST by
kattracks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
To: kattracks
You kick A$$.
Magnificent post!!!!!!!!!!!!
2 posted on
02/10/2004 9:35:09 PM PST by
Redcoat LI
("If you're going to shoot,shoot,don't talk" Tuco BenedictoPacifico Juan Maria Ramirez)
To: section9; Nick Danger; Sabertooth; blam; Lazamataz; harpseal; Squantos; Travis McGee
3 posted on
02/10/2004 9:35:16 PM PST by
Southack
(Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: kattracks
"Strategery"
To: kattracks
wow!! Just wow!!!
To: kattracks
That's great. I'm so tired of hearing the phrases "Bush violated international law!" or "He acted unilaterally!" that I could scream. There is no international law to violate! And even if there was, it would be horribly outdated, as this article points out. I'm glad someone can finally see that Bush knows what he's doing in the Middle East and with our foreign policy.
To: kattracks; ntnychik; autoresponder; MeekOneGOP
Bush's grand strategy This certainly makes good reading!! Wish we could get it out to the 'hoi poli'.
7 posted on
02/10/2004 9:40:21 PM PST by
potlatch
(Whenever I feel 'blue', I start breathing again.)
To: kattracks
I only have one quibble with the article. W has the fourth grand strategy. Ronald Reagan had the third. Thank (insert your favorite deity here) for both.
8 posted on
02/10/2004 9:40:36 PM PST by
Young Rhino
(http://www.artofdivorce.com)
To: kattracks
I agree. Bush has become a great world leader over the past 3 years. (I hope Jim Robinson doesn't kick me off FR for posting my opinion on this)
9 posted on
02/10/2004 9:41:09 PM PST by
Jorge
To: kattracks
Great read. Thanks again kat.
10 posted on
02/10/2004 9:41:12 PM PST by
kimmie7
(We're going to Boston in March. Can a Southerner LIVE 3 days without sweet tea? Pray for Jacob!)
To: kattracks
I suppose the end of the Carter doctrine and the beginning of the Reagan years didn't qualify as a grand scheme in this termite's mind.
Laying waste to a super-power in less than eight years through peaceful means, setting a new economic policy that would essentially see another twenty plus years of prosperity befall this nation, and setting a moral tone that would have seen this nation start the new millinium with high morals, if only 'scratch and sniff' hadn't been elected, weren't worthy of an honorable mention.
Why is Bush policy worthy of all this praise, the intoning of 'sage status' regarding it's merit? Why hell, it's because he's spending on a level only rivaled by Roosevelt, and has made it pefectly clear that he'll bend over backwards for those who are stripping regions of this nation of it's wealth.
In addition Bush is laying the foundation for additional 60 year programs that will lay waste to the possibility of us every getting out from under the big nanny-state. At least this termite was smart enough to glom onto one of his own.
To: kattracks
Well Duh! the Ivy league professor finally figured out what we knew all along.....that the old model of the middle east forged upon the fall of the ottoman empire was not working for us, In fact it had turned upon the west.
GW has rightly realized that although the post ottoman middle east was forged by Europeans, its failures were being heaped upon the foot of America due to our role as leaders in the world (post cold war).
If we are to be saddled with being the cause of all the misfortunes of the past as leaders perhaps we the US should act as leaders and take charge of change.
GW has done this, and has set the world on a brave new course.
13 posted on
02/10/2004 9:46:51 PM PST by
mylife
To: kattracks
"so far the military action in Iraq has produced a modest improvement in American and global economic conditions;
- an intensified dialogue within the Arab world about political reform;
- a withdrawal of American forces from Saudi Arabia;
- and an increasing nervousness on the part of the Syrian and Iranian governments as they contemplated the consequences of being surrounded by American clients or surrogates.
- The United States has emerged as a more powerful and purposeful actor within the international system than it had been on September 11, 2001."Per AlGore: "...Iraq is a misguided adventure..."
Just Shut Up Al!
14 posted on
02/10/2004 9:47:00 PM PST by
TeleStraightShooter
(Kerry plans to apply post-Vietnam policy to Iraq: Skedaddle & let the Syrian Batthists take over)
To: kattracks
What a great post. The President is a major man in a political world occupied by small men.
15 posted on
02/10/2004 9:52:48 PM PST by
Dolphy
To: kattracks
Also bigtime changes in Libya.
16 posted on
02/10/2004 9:53:09 PM PST by
Consort
To: kattracks
The professor is right on the money. And McAwful and company are still smartin' over the 2000 election. What a choice we had! We had to put either:
1) A BUSH
or --
2) A PRICK
in the White House.
The Right Decision was made then. The Right Decision will be made in 2004. WHY?! Simple. Same choice:-)
19 posted on
02/10/2004 10:01:54 PM PST by
Y2Krap
(HOWARD DEAN FOR PRESIDENT (Cue Music: "Uppa U.S., Gov'Ner"))
To: kattracks
Another great article. Thanks for posting. What I like to refer to as "taking out the trash." Every forty or fifty years we have to "take out the trash." In the forties it was Hitler and we should have taken out Stalin. And today its Saddam Hussein, OBL, Gadhafi(who cried "uncle" rather than be "taken out") and various and sundry other bad actors throughout the Middle East.
21 posted on
02/10/2004 10:09:22 PM PST by
kellynla
("C" 1/5 1st Mar. Div. U.S.M.C. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi!)
To: kattracks
This article is a wonderful find. Thanks!
22 posted on
02/10/2004 10:09:36 PM PST by
Judith Anne
(Send a message to the Democrat traitors--ROCKEFELLER MUST RESIGN!)
To: kattracks
The Truman Doctrine should more correctly be called the Reagan Doctrine because he understood what it should have been and how to apply it with greatest effect.
24 posted on
02/10/2004 10:12:27 PM PST by
Kirkwood
To: kattracks
bump, for a later read
26 posted on
02/10/2004 10:12:40 PM PST by
ilgipper
To: kattracks
bump, for a later read
27 posted on
02/10/2004 10:12:41 PM PST by
ilgipper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson