Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clark Abandons Presidential Bid
MyWay News ^

Posted on 02/10/2004 9:21:11 PM PST by Happy2BMe

WASHINGTON (AP) - Wesley Clark, the novice politician with four-star military credentials, abandoned his presidential bid Tuesday after two third-place finishes in the South.

The retired Army general will return to Little Rock, Ark., on Wednesday to announce his departure from the race, said campaign spokesman Matt Bennett. Clark will pledge to work closely with the Democratic Party to support the presidential nominee and other candidates across the country.

"He made this decision after discussing it with his family and his staff," Bennett said. "It was a very difficult decision to make obviously. He did it after the final results were in for Tennessee and the decision is final."

He is the fifth Democrat to drop out of the race. Five remain: Front-runner John Kerry, John Edwards, Howard Dean, Dennis Kucinich and Al Sharpton.

The news of Clark's departure broke shortly after he spoke to supporters, promising to keep waging fights on behalf of Democratic causes. Clark didn't know at the time he had finished third in Tennessee, along with his third-place finish in Virginia. The results sealed his fate.

New to politics, Clark may still have a future. At 59, he is young enough for another race and, with his military experience, he might fit on a wartime Democratic ticket.

Clark entered the race in September, a late start for a neophyte campaigner, but he quickly rose to the top of polls of Democrats and others considering an alternative to President Bush. He decided to skip the Iowa caucuses to focus all of his efforts on New Hampshire, a move that some friends and family now call a mistake.

In appealing to voters, Clark relied almost entirely on his 34 years in military service, which included serving as supreme allied commander of NATO. He promoted his wartime record, from being wounded in Vietnam in 1970 to running the bombing campaign in the war in Kosovo in 1999, as the kind of experience needed with American soldiers in Iraq and concerns about security at home.

Supporters touted other qualities - his Southern roots and his status as a Washington outsider - they contended that made Clark the candidate most likely to defeat Bush. Plus, he provided another forceful voice in condemning the war in Iraq, which he frequently called unnecessary, reckless and wrong.

"I would not have gone into Iraq in the first place," he said. "My position was that Iraq was not an imminent threat. I would have concentrated on Osama bin Laden."

For a latecomer, Clark had enormous fund-raising success. He raised nearly $15 million in 2003 and started January with at least $10 million left and the prospect of raising nearly $1 million per week as the first elections neared.

Yet Clark's inexperience as a candidate caused him problems. On the first full day of his campaign, Clark said he probably would have voted for the Bush-backed Iraq resolution but then, a day later, insisted he never would have voted "for this war." His supporters were left confused while his detractors grew elated. Questions about his stand on the war in Iraq never ceased.

"I bobbled the question," he later told The Associated Press. "Even Rhodes scholars make mistakes."

Still, he won Oklahoma's primary, and finished second in Arizona, New Mexico, North Dakota - shining a light on what Democrats' believe is Bush's vulnerability on foreign policy.

Another rub following Clark was whether he was a Republican at heart and a Democrat only by necessity. He explained that, as a military man, he did not have a party affiliation. On the other hand, he had voted for Republican presidents, had complimented Bush, and had considered joining the GOP after retirement.

Day after day of retail politicking in New Hampshire came to naught for Clark. He finished third in the nation's first primary with just 12 percent of the vote, well behind Kerry and Dean and only slightly ahead of John Edwards. He was the choice of voters who considered terrorism or national security the top issue, but that was just one in 20.

Clark turned to the South and West, regions where veterans were plentiful. But by then Kerry had perfected his appeal to their brothers in arms and had taken on the aura of a consensus candidate for those determined to select a winner against Bush.

Clark was born in Chicago in 1944 and grew up in Little Rock, Ark. His father died when he was 4. He finished first in his class at West Point, studied as a Rhodes Scholar at Oxford, earned a Silver Star for heroism in Vietnam, and served as a White House fellow.

---


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 2004; clark
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
Good riddance!
1 posted on 02/10/2004 9:21:12 PM PST by Happy2BMe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
All I have to say about it is that I hope Michael Moore is pi$$ed.
2 posted on 02/10/2004 9:22:32 PM PST by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe; MeekOneGOP; autoresponder
FREEP ABC POLL: "Who would you vote for in the presidential election?"
   

Who would you vote for in the presidential election?
You Have Previously Voted In This Poll
George W. Bush
43 %
John Kerry
33 %
John Edwards
8 %
Howard Dean
5 %
Wesley Clark
11 %

Total: 37764 votes

3 posted on 02/10/2004 9:22:54 PM PST by Happy2BMe (U.S. borders - Controlled by CORRUPT Politicians and Slave-Labor Employers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
See ya............I hope never again
4 posted on 02/10/2004 9:24:04 PM PST by Ethyl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree
Michael Moore is pissed off all the time and needs to blather on about guns, conservatives , and Bush In order to keep from looking at his own miserable excuse of a life. Run on sentence brought to you by handk and sofa king
5 posted on 02/10/2004 9:25:16 PM PST by reluctantwarrior (Strength and Honor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: reluctantwarrior
Thanks for the runon sentence.
What's a handk and sofa king?
6 posted on 02/10/2004 9:27:06 PM PST by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
What a damn loser
7 posted on 02/10/2004 9:27:41 PM PST by ClintonBeGone (<a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/~clintonbegone/">Hero</font></a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
Another nail in the coffin of the Clinton political machine. Wonderful!
8 posted on 02/10/2004 9:28:13 PM PST by lawgirl (God to womankind: "Here's Cary Grant. Now don't say I never gave you anything.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
Perhaps he chooses to travel back in time to recreate himself so by this time he is as popular as Kerry...
9 posted on 02/10/2004 9:28:42 PM PST by BigSkyVic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyVic

10 posted on 02/10/2004 9:29:20 PM PST by Ramtek57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree
I'm a hoorible typist and I post while doing other tasks so my grammar spelling and punctuation are bad. handk and sofa king are two FReepers who latched onto my posts as examples of poor writing which it usually is.
11 posted on 02/10/2004 9:30:16 PM PST by reluctantwarrior (Strength and Honor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
That's 57% Democrats, 43% Bush. Hmmm....
12 posted on 02/10/2004 9:31:25 PM PST by brewcrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: brewcrew
Good point. Bush may need those "conservative" fringe voters after all.
13 posted on 02/10/2004 9:33:00 PM PST by Happy2BMe (U.S. borders - Controlled by CORRUPT Politicians and Slave-Labor Employers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: reluctantwarrior
I can sympathize with that pretty much. The only reason I learned how to type is because computers got invented in my old age, and you have to type on them.

I even went all the way through college without ever learning (30 some years ago).
14 posted on 02/10/2004 9:34:05 PM PST by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
Oh no! Not Clark. He was the darling of the liberal media a month ago. How can this happen? (sob!)
15 posted on 02/10/2004 9:35:49 PM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
Don't let the door hit you on the way out!
16 posted on 02/10/2004 9:37:53 PM PST by Wally_Kalbacken (Seldom right, never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
Good riddance indeed. I am still mystified how a person who has been declared a war criminal for his barbaric role in the NATO terror bombing campaign could have ever been able to run for president.

The sheer hypocrisy of him asserting that war should be the last resort when it cleary was not for him in 1999.

I also found it rather bizarre when he asserted that no 911 type attacks would occur on his watch. This is especially bizarre when considering how his presidency would have surely put the country at a retaliatory risk by Serbians who might have been roused into avenging the senseless slaughter of their innocent civilians.

17 posted on 02/10/2004 10:03:58 PM PST by Republic_of_Secession.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
Clark may still have a future. At 59, he is young enough...

Hey Wesley, they're hiring down at the carwash! L-O-S-E-R

18 posted on 02/10/2004 10:05:51 PM PST by XHogPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree
He's going to continue to help the Democrats by showing them the way? Hey, boys, this is the way I did it in Kosovo, follow me. No, this way, not that way. Hey, where is Wes? I don't know, I think he went to check on the progress of the Clinton Library. He heard there may be something in there about him. Yeah, twice a loser.
19 posted on 02/10/2004 10:50:34 PM PST by taxesareforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: XHogPilot
I forsee a bright future for Wesley Clark, in the weeks and months to come.

It involves a paper hat, and the repeated question: "... and would you like that super-sized, sir...?" :)

20 posted on 02/10/2004 10:54:09 PM PST by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("The Clintons have damaged our country. They have done it together, in unison." -- Peggy Noonan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson