Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Happy2BMe
Good riddance indeed. I am still mystified how a person who has been declared a war criminal for his barbaric role in the NATO terror bombing campaign could have ever been able to run for president.

The sheer hypocrisy of him asserting that war should be the last resort when it cleary was not for him in 1999.

I also found it rather bizarre when he asserted that no 911 type attacks would occur on his watch. This is especially bizarre when considering how his presidency would have surely put the country at a retaliatory risk by Serbians who might have been roused into avenging the senseless slaughter of their innocent civilians.

17 posted on 02/10/2004 10:03:58 PM PST by Republic_of_Secession.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Republic_of_Secession.
What sunk Clark as much as anything was the damning testimonies of his peers.

Every Four-Star General officer interviewed when asked if Clark made good presidential material said he had INTEGRITY ISSUES.

Generals Tommy Franks and (Stormin') Norman Schwarzkopf both said the same thing. He took a nosedive straight from there.

Ain't truth wonderful?

24 posted on 02/11/2004 4:20:17 AM PST by Happy2BMe (U.S. borders - Controlled by CORRUPT Politicians and Slave-Labor Employers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson