Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bishop Knew Police Were Looking for Car When He Sought Windshield Repair
AP ^ | Feb. 10, '04

Posted on 02/10/2004 4:29:45 PM PST by nuconvert

Bishop Knew Police Were Looking for Car When He Sought Windshield Repair

By Anabelle Garay Associated Press Writer

Published: Feb 10, 2004

PHOENIX (AP) - Bishop Thomas O'Brien conceded during his hit-and-run trial Tuesday that he asked about getting his windshield fixed even though he knew police were investigating whether the car had been involved in a deadly accident. "I was interested in getting the windshield fixed at some time," the Roman Catholic clergyman said in his second day on the witness stand. "There is no way I would have gotten that windshield fixed that day."

A diocesan secretary testified earlier that O'Brien called her about the windshield, which was smashed when O'Brien's car hit a pedestrian, the Monday after the weekend accident. She said she thought O'Brien wanted it fixed the same day.

But O'Brien said the secretary might have misunderstood him.

The bishop has said he initially thought has car had been hit by a rock or a dog. Prosecutors have argued that O'Brien knew or should have known that he hit a pedestrian on the night of June 14.

The 68-year-old bishop is accused of leaving the scene of an accident that killed Jim Reed. If convicted, O'Brien could get nearly four years in prison.

His arrest ended his 21-year career as head of the Phoenix Diocese. The accident occurred less than two weeks after prosecutors announced O'Brien had struck a deal to avoid indictment on obstruction charges for protecting child-molesting priests.

The bishop was told by a diocesan official, Monsignor Dale Fushek, the day after the accident that police were concerned the car might have been involved in a fatal accident, but O'Brien did not speak to police until the next day, Monday.

Under cross-examination, O'Brien was asked why he did not call police after he learned officers were investigating a fatal accident.

"All this time had elapsed and police had still not contacted me," he said. "That led me to believe what happened Saturday night did not involve me."

Prosecutor Mitch Rand pointed out that O'Brien did not answer his phone Sunday night or immediately answer his door for police on Monday morning. O'Brien said he did not answer the phone because he was in his home chapel on Sunday night, and on Monday morning, he thought the officers, who were not in uniform, were reporters.

O'Brien said that after he learned of the fatal accident, he went into a room with his assistant and cried.

"There were certainly feelings of regret, a deep profound sense of sorrow and sadness that I was possibly involved in the death of this individual," he said.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News
KEYWORDS: accident; bishop; hitandrun; trial; windshield

1 posted on 02/10/2004 4:29:48 PM PST by nuconvert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
The accident occurred less than two weeks after prosecutors announced O'Brien had struck a deal to avoid indictment on obstruction charges for protecting child-molesting priests.

"There were certainly feelings of regret, a deep profound sense of sorrow and sadness that I was possibly involved in the death of this individual," he said.

I wonder if he's going for a record. First, you destroy the lives of countless children; then when you get caught protecting the pedophiles, you start killing pedestrians. Nice guy.

2 posted on 02/10/2004 4:34:21 PM PST by Hodar (With Rights, comes Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
Yeah, he's a gem.
3 posted on 02/10/2004 4:37:22 PM PST by nuconvert ("Why do you have to be a nonconformist like everybody else?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
I wonder why he was in such a hurry or why he didn't want the police to arrive while he was there? Inquiring minds...
4 posted on 02/10/2004 4:44:25 PM PST by ItisaReligionofPeace (I'm from the government and I'm here to help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
There were certainly feelings of regret, a deep profound sense of sorrow and sadness in getting caught.
5 posted on 02/10/2004 4:53:11 PM PST by Drango (Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango
"in getting caught"

LoL. Exactly.
6 posted on 02/10/2004 4:54:14 PM PST by nuconvert ("Why do you have to be a nonconformist like everybody else?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
I know we are all sinners, but you'd think a darn Bishop would understand the importance of humility, honesty, and integrity! Instead he squirms, lies and evades.

Reminds me of Ghandi's quote: 'I would've likely become a Christian, but I knew too many.'
7 posted on 02/10/2004 6:07:12 PM PST by txzman (Jer 23:29)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
Boy. You sure assume a lot. Did you know that the 'pedestrian' was drunk, and the Bishop was not, or that the pedestrian was hit by two cars and they are still looking for the second car.

How about, the Bishop was not speeding, and in the proper lane. He didn't jump the curb to hit the guy. What does 'strike' a deal have to do with a car accident?

I guess it's just Catholic bashing time, you guys just can't get enough.

8 posted on 02/10/2004 6:27:40 PM PST by duckln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: duckln; All
I have enough Catholic guilt built up inside of me, that I won't bash the Church...however, enough is enough already. Come clean, sweep them out to the curb, and reunite the faithful.

I miss Father Dale. He is an *extraordinary* leader in the Catholic Church. I just don't see things working in our favor for returning to AZ in the near future.

Father Dale is about the only reason I'd immediately become an active member of the Catholic Church, again.

9 posted on 02/10/2004 6:40:51 PM PST by getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL (The mediocre man, when he's used the last piece of t.p., leaves the empty roll for the next person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: duckln
Are you sure you're not drunk?

O'Brien had 48 hours to turn himself in, yet he played "come and get me, copper."

An innocent, he ain't.

10 posted on 02/10/2004 6:44:23 PM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: txzman
"you'd think a darn Bishop would understand the importance of humility, honesty, and integrity!"

Not to mention morality.
11 posted on 02/10/2004 6:55:08 PM PST by nuconvert ("Why do you have to be a nonconformist like everybody else?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL
"I have enough Catholic guilt built up inside of me, that I won't bash the Church."

That's the true evil of many religion's. You should not be living with guilt if you have given your sins to the Saviour, Jesus Christ. He died for your sins and is your personal preacher and confidante. No one on this earth can take that away from you. God Bless...
12 posted on 02/10/2004 9:01:47 PM PST by liberty or death
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
An innocent, he ain't.

That's a decision the jury makes my friend. A 'poor drunken soul' staggers into taffic and gets bumped. Happens all the time without the driver realizing it.

13 posted on 02/10/2004 9:19:57 PM PST by duckln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL
enough is enough already

I agree. We are being brainwashed by Mel Gibson haters. Constantly and it seems seasonally all the multi year old accusations and all unfortunate rare incidences involving the clergy is twisted and retwisted.

Like the Democrates whining again about Bushes Guard service , it's enough to drive you nuts.

sweep them out to the curb

That's exactly the goal of the 'bashers' and what they mean is sweep everyone on the curb. They have the same objective as Islamists. Don't fall for it.

14 posted on 02/10/2004 9:35:54 PM PST by duckln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: duckln
I guess it's just Catholic bashing time, you guys just can't get enough.

You know, I don't care if the bishop was driving 0.25 mph, and the pedestrian was taking a nap in the road. Fleeing the scene of an accident, repairing the damage caused by hitting a human body, and hiding evidence is hardly Catholic Bashing.

A Bishop who worked to hide FELONIES (after all, I'm sure the children loved being anally raped by priests, huh?) and strikes a deal to avoid doing hard time, is hardly Catholic bashing.

This is simply an evil man, who got his jollies at the expense of children. This evil man then ran over a pedestrian (drunk, sober, or even Democrat is immaterial).

Or, are we simply supposed to declare it suicide and forget all the damage this man has done simply because he's Catholic? Nice double standard you have there. I'm absolutely certain that if this were a non-Catholic (say, Bill or Hillary Clinton, Al Franken, jewish rabbi, or school teacher) you'd be screaming for the death sentence.

15 posted on 02/11/2004 7:19:05 AM PST by Hodar (With Rights, comes Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
I guess it's just Catholic bashing time, you guys just can't get enough.
You're proving my point!

Well, 'fleeing, repairing and hiding evidence' is being adjudicated. They should have the facts which you simply assume from a Catholic bashing press. They would blame this one on the pope if they could.

Truth is, at the whim of the press, the courts via opportunist DA's elevate the bashing to a new level. It took the Supreme last year to decide against these kooks attempting to prosecute cases well beyond the statute of limitations period.

This is simply an evil man, who got his jollies at the expense of children.

Are you serious? You have met the man? Or are you a self righteous media absorbing sponge? You are the definition of a basher.

Or, are we simply supposed to declare it suicide and forget all the damage this man has done simply because he's Catholic?

No, but, conversely we shouldn't condemn him because he is Catholic. Doesn't it bother you that their are hundreds of hit and runs each year all over the country, yet this guy gets the 'front page' ad nauseum.

Nice double standard you have there. I'm absolutely certain that if this were a non-Catholic (say, Bill or Hillary Clinton, Al Franken, jewish rabbi, or school teacher) you'd be screaming for the death sentence.

No double standard at all. I'd wager if you compared the groups these people belong to: Politicians, Jewish comedians, School Teachers , they are more notorious by double. I exempt the Rabbis because, I am not your opposite, an anti-semite.

16 posted on 02/11/2004 12:41:04 PM PST by duckln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: duckln
Do you know me? I don't think so. However, you sure seem confident in labelling me based upon a few paragraphs of my prose.

First, the statute of limitations is sheer crap. I doubt that God would say "You protected priests who raped an innocent children ... but hey; that was years ago.... forgettaboutit".

A self-proclaimed 'Man of God' released predators upon innocent children, then harbored and hid their crimes. And instead of crying "Get out of my sight, you degenerate cretin", you scream "Quit Catholic Bashing".

Secondly, you point out that the victim, the man who is now dead was somehow at fault for the accident. He was drunk, he was on the road. So what?? He was killed, and the killer fled, then tried to destroy the evidence. The "Man of God", committed vehicular manslaughter. It may have been accidental, it may have been unavoidable ... but he fled the scene, then worked to confound the investigation. I don't care if he's Catholic or not.

You are screaming 'Catholic Bashers' with the same credability of a race baiter. I don't care what religon you are, raping children is wrong. Hiding those who rape children is rehensible. Fleeing the scene of an accident is wrong. Destroying evidence is wrong. I don't care if you are Jewish, Catholic, Black, Mexican, Caucasion or Martian.

You, on the other hand want a double standard. If a group of .... lets say ..librarians actively work to hide and introduce known child molesters into a community; then offer sanctuary to these child abusers; they would be treated as an organized criminal group and be punished under the RICO acts. Somehow these "Men of God" do exactly the same thing, yet they are forgiven, and even retire with benefits. Heck, the Pope doesn't care all that much.

Newsflash ... try the same thing at your job. You'll be fired so fast your head will spin (no retirement, no benefits, no pension); then you'll go to jail. But, chances are you are not a priest. Apparently they get a different set of laws they get to live under.

Oh, and Reuters is now reporting that even more cases of child abuse are present than are presently being reported. It's not an isolated thing, it's an epidemic; and it's been going on for decades. Nice.
17 posted on 02/11/2004 1:00:06 PM PST by Hodar (With Rights, comes Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson