Skip to comments.
Perspective as to W's Game--another side to MTP Interview?
andrewsullivan blog ^
| 2-9-2004
| Sullivan, Andrew
Posted on 02/09/2004 4:13:03 PM PST by ontos-on
BUSH'S MBA: A fellow student and subsequent professor analyzes George W. Bush from the Harvard Business School perspective. It's interesting reading. Money quote:
By reputation, the President was a very avid and skillful poker player when he was an MBA student. One of the secrets of a successful poker player is to encourage your opponent to bet a lot of chips on a losing hand. This is a pattern of behavior one sees repeatedly in George W. Bushs political career. He is not one to loudly proclaim his strengths at the beginning of a campaign. Instead, he bides his time, does not respond forcefully, a least at first, to critiques from his enemies, no matter how loud and annoying they get. If anything, this apparent passivity only goads them into making their case more emphatically.
Only time will tell, whether Saddam ever had any WMDs. Their non-existence has not been proven. Only time will tell whether or not Osama bin Laden (or his corpse) will be taken into custody by American Troops. Only time will tell whether or not Iraq will continue to make progress toward a transition toward a peaceful democratic government. George W. Bush knows much more information about these topics than his domestic political opponents do. At the moment, they are betting a lot of their chips on one side of these questions.
We will see by November who has the winning hand.
TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS: 2004; andrewsullivan; bush; harvard; interview; meetthepress; mtp; pokerplayer; russert; strategry; w
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
To: section9
He wasn't talking to Russert. He was talking past Russert. I agree. I watched the interview and felt he was talking to me. Russert was annoying--an intrusion.
The President was firm, on message, gracious, trustworty with a clear vision.
I was once again grateful for his leadership.
To: Keith in Iowa
The only good news for Democrats is they could save $$ by switching to Geico. LOL! What a great tag line! ;-D
22
posted on
02/09/2004 4:33:51 PM PST
by
nutmeg
(Why vote for Bush? Imagine Commander in Chief John F'in Kerry!)
To: nutmeg
With a capitol "T".
23
posted on
02/09/2004 4:34:16 PM PST
by
Neets
(Complainers change their complaints, but they never reduce the amount of time spent in complaining.~)
To: Hoosier-Daddy
if there's one consistency in this universe, it's that whenever Algore has an opinion on something, you can bet in very short order something will come out to make him look like a complete fool. We can only hope.
To: section9
He wasn't talking to Russert. He was talking past Russert.Exactly. It's what leaders do while middle management types keep harping on some conspiracy or gossip.
25
posted on
02/09/2004 4:35:06 PM PST
by
Dolphy
To: Servant of the 9
Bush also looked very tired I thought he was tired of answering the same old questions again and again.
26
posted on
02/09/2004 4:35:31 PM PST
by
Amelia
To: section9
I felt yesterday that Bush was talking to us not to the MTP audience. It was a message to the loyalists...Let's Roll.
To: Hoosier-Daddy
Frankly, I don't think Algore has, in the last 4 years, been right about anything in politicsAlgore just ain't right (ya know, in the head)!!
To: nutmeg
Me, too. That is so important right now. Just don't listen to them. Just trust God and George.
29
posted on
02/09/2004 4:38:13 PM PST
by
beckysueb
(Lady Liberty is in danger! Bush/Cheney 04.)
To: abclily
"I listened to some of the interview. Sounded to me like W was sandbagging. He's holding info for later - after the dems are all on film screaming and ranting their lies, then W will show what wimpy liars they are."Yep. Letting out lots of rope for the Rats....
30
posted on
02/09/2004 4:39:26 PM PST
by
eureka!
(My hope of hopes is the total demise of the Rat party....)
To: ontos-on
Did no one hear the answer W gave to Russert when asked if he knew where Bin Laden was. W said that he WOULDN'T answer that. HUMMMMMM! I have seen this NOWHERE in the press or on FR. Russert told W that Sen. Grassley said we would get Bin Laden this year. That was the context of the question. October surprise?
31
posted on
02/09/2004 4:40:39 PM PST
by
nightowl
To: TejasRose
Algore just ain't right (ya know, in the head)!! On Fox News tonight, Mort Kondrake referred to him as demented and said we were very lucky he had not won in 2000.
Even Mara Liason (sp) the house liberal admited he had lost his mind.
SO9
To: Pukin Dog; swarthyguy; Shermy; Boot Hill; Cap Huff
We just witnessed this in Paksitan.
The best victory is when the opponent surrenders of its own accord before there are any actual hostilities...It is best to win without fighting. Sun-tzu, The Art of War. Planning a Siege
33
posted on
02/09/2004 4:42:24 PM PST
by
Dog
To: nightowl
There was a thread on that comment yesterday .....a freeper did pick up on it.
34
posted on
02/09/2004 4:43:47 PM PST
by
Dog
To: nightowl
Was Grassley just off the reservation...or part of strategery?
35
posted on
02/09/2004 4:44:21 PM PST
by
ontos-on
To: ontos-on
I went and read the complete article. It answers a lot of questions on why Bush is doing some things that are driving conservatives crazy. There is a method to his madness. I encourage all to read the article. It explains why he is the President and we are not.
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles.php?article_id=3378
36
posted on
02/09/2004 4:46:41 PM PST
by
armymarinedad
(Patriots love their way of life. Liberals love their lifestyle.)
To: beckysueb
My favorite quote from the 2000 campaign was the one of W simply saying:
" I know what I am doing."
I hope he knows a lot better this time, I really don't want another "close election", IYDM.
37
posted on
02/09/2004 4:49:00 PM PST
by
ontos-on
To: Dog
38
posted on
02/09/2004 4:54:01 PM PST
by
swarthyguy
(Russia doesn't conduct negotiations with terrorists -- it destroys them," Vlad Putin)
Comment #39 Removed by Moderator
To: swarthyguy
Bingo.
40
posted on
02/09/2004 4:55:01 PM PST
by
Dog
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson