Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Friendliness of Host Countries Influences US Troop Redeployment
CNSNEWS.com ^ | 2/09/04 | Patrick Goodenough

Posted on 02/09/2004 3:26:20 AM PST by kattracks

Pacific Rim Bureau (CNSNews.com) - South Korea, along with Germany, will be among the countries most affected by the worldwide redeployment of American armed forces, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said at the weekend.

And in a comment that will resonate in South Korea, he added that that the U.S. favored keeping troops in friendly locations.

Speaking at a press conference in Munich, where he was attending a NATO ministers meeting, Rumsfeld said the repositioning of forces was an "enormously complex" exercise that was still being worked on, "but clearly the countries that have the most substantial numbers of forces are going to be affected."

He named South Korea - where 37,000 U.S. troops are stationed - and Germany - home to about 70,000 - as countries where "we have a lot of troops."

Rumsfeld said the factors under consideration include the type of welcome the troops could expect in a host country. "I don't want our forces in places that are inhospitable and where people don't want them there."

Although Rumsfeld added that "Germany has been a hospitable place for our forces," he did not say the same of South Korea.

In the past two years, anti-U.S. sentiment has flared in South Korea, particularly among younger people who feel a greater affinity for fellow Koreans in the communist North than they do for the uniformed Americans who have been based there since the 1950-53 Korean War.

A series of large public protests were held in late 2002, following the accidental deaths of two schoolgirls, knocked down by a U.S. Army vehicle on a public highway.

The U.S. Forces Korea (USFK) at the time reported an increase in reports of assaults and verbal abuse against service personnel, and some businesses temporarily refused to serve American troops.

The period coincided with a presidential election campaign, during which liberal candidate - now president - Roh Moo-hyun was accused of trying to capitalize on the anti-U.S. feeling.

He told supporters that he would ensure the country's half-century-old military alliance would be better balanced, and that he would "not pander to the U.S. administration."

Once in office, Roh worked to mend fences, assuring USFK officers that the alliance was important and necessary, supporting the war against Saddam Hussein, and initiating moves to send Korean troops to help rebuild Iraq.

At the same time, and partly in response to the anti-U.S. sentiment, the U.S. and Korean militaries have been negotiating a withdrawal of the bulk of troops away from the demilitarized zone and, significantly, out of the large military base -- Yongsan Garrison, located in the center of Seoul.

But the Pentagon has long been hinting that a broader program of post-Cold War worldwide force redeployments will go a lot further, eventually likely to entail a reduction of the overall number of troops in Korea.

On a visit to Seoul last November, Rumsfeld said military power did not mean sheer numbers of troops, but how men and material were used. Korean media, and analysts interpreted the statement as a sign that the U.S. was planning troops cuts.

"Many diplomats and national security officials in the Korean government believe the reduction of U.S. troops is just a matter of time," Seoul's JoongAng Ilbo newspaper said in a recent column.

The issue has prompted considerable speculation, invariably quelled by the U.S.

Last year, reports emerged citing unnamed defense officials as saying that many Asia-based U.S. troops might be relocated to bases in Australia. Both Canberra and the Pentagon dismissed them as wrong.

Last week, reports appeared in Korean, Japanese and U.S. papers about U.S. plans to radically restructure its forces in the Pacific, including the likely dismantling of USFK, a combined U.S.-Korea military command, and other key structures.

The USFK issued a statement denying the plans, and a Defense Department spokesman said "this speculation reported as fact does not help efforts to make decisions in consultations with our allies."

Responding to President Bush's proposal of a $48-billion increase in defense spending, and Rumsfeld's recent authorization of a temporary increase in the size of the Army, Cato Institute director of defense policy studies Charles Pe\'f1a last week called for a phasing out of "obsolete deployments" of U.S. forces in countries like Korea and Japan.

He called for "a more restrained military posture, particularly overseas deployments, many of which are holdovers from the Cold War and have little to do with safeguarding vital U.S. national security interests."

Send a Letter to the Editor about this article.

 



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: army; dod; germany; marines; military; navy; redeployment; southkorea; troopmovement; usaf; usmc

1 posted on 02/09/2004 3:26:20 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Future NYT headlines-

"Libya Agrees to Host US Air Base..."

"Vietnam Welcomes USN Pacific Fleet..."

I'm serious here folks. Here me now, believe me later.
2 posted on 02/09/2004 3:42:10 AM PST by My Dog Likes Me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My Dog Likes Me
It'd be great to have Cam Ranh Bay and Wheelus back!

Uh, but, we may have to fix them up a bit!
3 posted on 02/09/2004 3:58:05 AM PST by Levante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I say pull out of Korea now! Say goodbye to the big P.X. in the sky! Let them eat kimchee!
4 posted on 02/09/2004 4:13:21 AM PST by gr8eman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Levante
I know!

I sense it coming. We had a USN ship dock in 'Nam recently, and our relations with Libya are improving.

As Art Bell might say "Things are coming together..." (start theme music..)
5 posted on 02/09/2004 4:18:28 AM PST by My Dog Likes Me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: My Dog Likes Me
It's possible. Old enemies sometimes become new allies.

And the Germans and Koreans have shown that they don't want us anymore. Let them eat 'cake'.

6 posted on 02/09/2004 5:14:55 AM PST by LibKill (My sigil: Two crossed, dead, Frenchmen emblazoned on a mound of dead Frenchmen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: My Dog Likes Me
You're not crazy, MDLM!!!

I think nothing would make the Vietnamese happier than having US forces full-time in their territory. They'd be salivating at the potential revenue this could generate.

How ironic: A country that fought to kick the Americans out of their territory, now eagerly welcomes them. The fight was lost with guns, but won with dollars.

And about Libya, sounds attractive a second front in the Middle East (although it's actually Northern Africa). I like that.
7 posted on 02/09/2004 5:18:11 AM PST by El Conservador ("No blood for oil!"... Then don't drive, you moron!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
re: And in a comment that will resonate in South Korea, he added that that the U.S. favored keeping troops in friendly locations.)))

Love ya, Rummy, bump.

8 posted on 02/09/2004 5:19:18 AM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Get us completely out of Germany. OK, so I know we have to keep the big medical base, but get out of the rest. The Germans have proven to be inhospitable allies. The people around the bases like us (or rather, like our money) but the rest of the country has just been too vocal with their anti-American slams. Get us out of that country.
9 posted on 02/09/2004 5:47:43 AM PST by McGavin999 (Evil thrives when good men do nothing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
Why keep the medical base? You can move it as easily (or with as much difficulty) as any other military infrastructure. How about Spain for that base?
10 posted on 02/09/2004 5:50:03 AM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub; Ragtime Cowgirl
*YEP*YEP*YEP*YEP*YYYEEEPPPEEE!

I LOVE YOU RUMMY...bring our guys home from So Korea...YESTERDAY!
11 posted on 02/09/2004 5:59:40 AM PST by getgoing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: getgoing; kattracks
Lol, I think the S. Koreans are now the second biggest contributor (after UK) to our war efforts in Iraq. Not sure Rummy would appreciate this article at this time, though he has been working with the S. Koreans to move our troops from the DMZ for a while now, and the ability of our enemies (and their press accomplices) to incite riots still in S. Korea based on one unintended accident must rile (free Mumia, blame America, no war for oil, usual suspects, useful idiots).

Pinging for the headline, and our gutsy SOD.

His amazing speech for NATO:

8 Secretary Rumsfeld Remarks at the Munich Conference on Security Policy ~ Saddam chose unwisely. ~ DoD | 2/07/04

12 posted on 02/09/2004 8:58:56 AM PST by Ragtime Cowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: El Conservador; LibKill; Levante
Yes, I see both moves as a real possibility. Our 17th Air Force moves back to Libya (you can drink a beer there, 'ya know), and our Pacific Fleet "represents" in Vietnam (they like us more than Fillipinos).

The strategy makes sense to me. And I'm not that bright either (except to my loyal mutt)!
13 posted on 02/10/2004 12:51:14 AM PST by My Dog Likes Me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson