Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'I DON'TS' WIN GAY WED POLL
New York Post ^ | 2/09/04 | Deborah Orin

Posted on 02/09/2004 1:19:07 AM PST by kattracks

Edited on 05/26/2004 5:19:28 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

February 9, 2004 -- Americans oppose the idea of gay marriage by a 2-1 ratio, according to a new Time magazine poll that also suggests any candidate who endorses the idea could pay a big political price.

The poll found 62 percent don't want gay marriages recognized as legal while 30 percent are in favor. In addition, 48 percent said they would be less likely to vote for a candidate who supports gay marriage.


(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: 2004; goodridge; marriage; polls; samesexmarriage

1 posted on 02/09/2004 1:19:08 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Here's what I want to know, can I marry my brother in Mass.? And could a father marry his son? After all, there would be no genetic problem, so why not?
2 posted on 02/09/2004 1:22:24 AM PST by FastCoyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FastCoyote
Well..ummm...whatever turns ye on! ;-)
3 posted on 02/09/2004 1:24:06 AM PST by Happygal (Le gách dea ghuí)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Happygal
[Hypotheticals only!]
4 posted on 02/09/2004 1:31:31 AM PST by FastCoyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
It would be nice if those 2-1 voters would repeat in a vote against Kerry, but I won't hold my breath.
5 posted on 02/09/2004 2:19:15 AM PST by Ophiucus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FastCoyote
Or for that matter, if "gays" can marry, why not a man and his horse? Or he could marry his 1957 Chevy?

If we're going to "all unnatural, all the time" we have a lot of new options..

6 posted on 02/09/2004 3:45:47 AM PST by USMCVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FastCoyote
Here's what I want to know, can I marry my brother in Mass.? And could a father marry his son? After all, there would be no genetic problem, so why not?

Actually if MA starts having those June sodomy weddings, it would be a good tactic to encourage some people to abuse the new law as much as possible.

Turn the law on its ear to illustrate the huge problems that will arise.
7 posted on 02/09/2004 3:47:21 AM PST by George W. Bush (It's the Congress, stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: USMCVet
Yeah really, I want to marry my motorhome.
8 posted on 02/09/2004 3:58:31 AM PST by garylmoore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: USMCVet
The Muslums may want to marry their sheep.
9 posted on 02/09/2004 4:15:54 AM PST by southland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FastCoyote
The law discriminates against ALL single people! I want full health care coverage and someone else's pension, too. I just don't want to have to live with someone to get it!

If the govt is supposed to respect the privacy of the bedroom (last summer's SC ruling against Texas) then I should not have to promise to do something in my bedroom to get these benefits. Nevermind horses and motorhomes - I want my share of handouts, too!
10 posted on 02/09/2004 6:01:04 AM PST by maica (Mainstream America Is Conservative America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The more science studies homosexuality, the more we see the major factor determining homosexuality is environment. That's not a bold statement, it's what science continues to report.

We should heed the words of John Adams when he said:

"Facts are stubborn things, and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence."
As two of the three little pigs learned, we must build our house out of something solid. This was an important teaching of Jesus as well. He said it is foolish to build your house on sand, or to build your core position on something that is easily washed away. Instead, we should build our position on something solid, something which stands firm under scrutiny.

In regards to homosexuality and genetics, the work of homosexual activist Dr. Simon LeVay has often been used to support the idea that homosexuality is genetic, and his work is still quoted to this day. But what did LeVay really find? Here is what LeVay said of his own work in a March 1994 interview with Discover magazine:

"[His 1991 research] made the unassuming LeVay one of the most misunderstood men in America. "It's important to stress what I didn't find," he points out with the courtly patience of someone who long ago got used to waiting for the rest of the world to catch up. "I did not prove that homosexuality is genetic, or find a genetic cause for being gay. I didn't show that gay men are 'born that way,' the most common mistake people make in interpreting my work. Nor did I locate a gay center in the brain --INAH3 is less likely to be the sole gay nucleus of the brain than part of a chain of nuclei engaged in men and women's sexual behavior. My work is just a hint in that direction--a spur, I hope, to future work."
Ten years later still nothing from LeVay or anybody else.

In 1973 the APA (American Psychiatric Association) declassified homosexuality as a mental disorder. According to LeVay, it wasn't science that propelled the APAs change, he said "Gay activism was clearly the force that propelled the APA to declassify homosexuality."

Dr. Robert L. Spitzer played a pivotal role in the above 1973 decision made by the APA. Spitzer used to believe homosexuals couldn't change but after studying the results of therapy he now believes homosexuals can change:

"I thought that homosexual behavior could be resisted--but that no one could really change their sexual orientation. I now believe that's untrue--some people can and do change."

Spitzer concluded with:

"the mental health professionals should stop moving in the direction of banning therapy that has, as a goal, a change in sexual orientation. Many patients, provided with informed consent about the possibility that they will be disappointed if the therapy does not succeed, can make a rational choice to work toward developing their heterosexual potential and minimizing their unwanted homosexual attractions."
This is amazing information! Homosexuals can change, they can leave their lifestyle! It's not just Spitzer and LeVay making the above comments, although they are well known, it's being reported by many different organizations that thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle.
11 posted on 02/09/2004 6:33:09 AM PST by scripter (Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson