Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Contact CBS-TV website http://www.cbs.com/

Scroll down to Feedback.

Tell CBS-TV that audiences don't like to be used, to be manipulated by depraved career-obsessed entertainers with CD's to sell, who expose themselves on primetime to hype their sorry careers......and then lie about it.

This is not about "exposing just one breast." It's the co-opting of audiences for personal profit as Jackass and Dimmerlake did.

We are tired of obsessed, success-driven entertainers, so depraved, they would do anything to boost their careers.

If Jackass and Dumberlake thought fornicating a dog at half time would sell CDs, they'd do it in a nanosecond.

If CBS and the rest of the brain-dead Hollywarped types continue to defend Jackass and Dimmerlake's lies, we shall take further action.

1 posted on 02/08/2004 3:22:34 AM PST by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Liz
bttt
2 posted on 02/08/2004 3:27:56 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: onyx; PhiKapMom; Libloather; mhking
Action needed, ping your lists.

Contact CBS-TV website http://www.cbs.com/

Scroll down to Feedback.


MESSAGE Tell CBS-TV that audiences don't like to be used, to be manipulated by depraved career-obsessed entertainers with CD's to sell, who expose themselves on primetime to hype their sorry careers......and then lie about it. This is not about "exposing just one breast." It's the co-opting of audiences for personal profit as Jackass and Dimmerlake did. We are tired of obsessed, success-driven entertainers, so depraved, they would do anything to boost their careers. If Jackass and Dumberlake thought fornicating a dog at halftime would sell CDs, they'd do it in a nanosecond. If CBS and the rest of the brain-dead Hollywarped types continue to defend Jackass and Dimmerlake's lies, we shall take further action.


3 posted on 02/08/2004 3:54:46 AM PST by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz
My email to CBS: I am really disappointed that you have buckled under pressure. It seems almost "Clintonesque".

First you feature Janet and Justin at half-time during the Super Bowl, that in itself was taking a risk; it didn't go over as you expected and you were bombarded with outraged viewers; then you dutifully apologize to appease your offended viewers, as well as "uninvited" Janet to be a presenter at the Grammys.

Now then you apparently feel you have done your duty and can get back in good graces with your MTV & under 30 viewers by trying to make a deal with Janet.

How low must you go before you get it? I'll be one of several that will opt not to watch. There will be those who will watch who hope to maybe see something shocking again. If that's the crowd you bow to, then so be it. You lose.
5 posted on 02/08/2004 4:12:56 AM PST by helpisontheway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz
I think the '15 minutes of fame' that Janet Jackson got from the Super Bowl stunt have just about elapsed.

She will now go back to being known as "Michael's little sister".

8 posted on 02/08/2004 4:39:52 AM PST by capt. norm (No sense being pessimistic, it probably wouldn't work anyway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz
Done.
10 posted on 02/08/2004 4:50:51 AM PST by hummingbird ("If it wasn't for the insomnia, I could have gotten some sleep!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz
Call your local affiliates.
13 posted on 02/08/2004 4:58:11 AM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz
Frankly, I don't care who's on the Grammys. I haven't watched in 20 years - it's been left-wing, Anti-American trash, and other assorted filth for a long time.

The best message to send CBS is to turn them off and leave them off.

19 posted on 02/08/2004 6:35:35 AM PST by hometoroost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz
These celebrities are all the same.

They claw, scratch, smear, lie, and sleep their way to "the top."

When they arrive, they all fail to realize that there is nothing there.

20 posted on 02/08/2004 6:56:52 AM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz
Grammy what? Hoo?
Never heard of 'em. Guess I won't be watching!

;^)
21 posted on 02/08/2004 8:37:20 AM PST by FBD (...Please press 2 for English...for Espanol, please stay on the line...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz
Will Janet be presenting at the SAG awards?
26 posted on 02/08/2004 10:12:09 AM PST by Joe 6-pack ("We deal in hard calibers and hot lead." - Roland Deschaines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz
The best way to tell CBS you don't care for what they are doing is NOT to watch the show. I'm not going to watch it and I usually like the Grammy's. OF course you all know that CBS will be rewarded because it will be the biggest grammy ratings getter...EVER. Watch and see.
28 posted on 02/08/2004 10:43:20 AM PST by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Liz
Cultural Toxin Alert!:

By Roger Friedman

EXCLUSIVE: Janet Rejects CBS Offer

Janet Jackson has decided not to accept the CBS offer to appear on tonight's Grammy show. The network said it would allow her to present a tribute to Luther Vandross if Jackson apologized for her appearance on last Sunday's Super Bowl half-time show.

Jackson, after much thought, decided she'd said she was sorry enough already and declined to be on the show. Patti Labelle will appear in her place.

I am told Janet was advised by her brother Michael Jackson "to stop apologizing already."


31 posted on 02/08/2004 11:10:06 AM PST by Helms (Liberals believe we are Crash Dummies on the hectic highway of the Cosmos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson