1 posted on
02/05/2004 11:43:01 AM PST by
knak
To: knak
Michael Howard, asking for the resignation of Tony Blair over the Iraqi WMD question, is wrong and very worrisome. The reason why I say this, is because of the article that has come out today on the non-sanctioned, Pakistan transfer of Nuclear secrets and products to 5 African Countries and North Korea.
This continued attack both on Tony Blair and George W Bush, is dangerous. Pakistan is fighting off a hord of terrorists who are trying to overthrow the government of Pakistan to get thier hands on the controls of such weapons. Numerous attemtps on the lives of the Prime Minister and other officials in Pakistan is proving this out.
If the Transfer of these secrets and products went to Africa, I find that it is probable that the intel was leaked and the CIA and British Intelligence, and knowing that a transfer of this information could be an any day scenario between any of the 5 countries and Iraq a war was inevitable.
The pardon of the individuals responsible for this transfer in Pakistan, had to be done to lessen the backlash on the Pakistani government, at a time when the Terrorists want create
a revolt within the country and take control of Pakistans
WMD.
It seems that political hay, is more important to some in this world, than the security of its citizen's.
I know I am reading between the lines, but to error for security, is more responsible than playing to the desenting voices for votes.
Ops4 God Bless America!
2 posted on
02/05/2004 11:44:57 AM PST by
OPS4
To: knak; Tijeras_Slim
3 posted on
02/05/2004 11:52:57 AM PST by
Squantos
(Salmon...the other pink meat !)
To: knak
This is some scary stuff. The implications are terrifying.
4 posted on
02/05/2004 12:39:05 PM PST by
cake_crumb
(UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
To: William McKinley; Shermy; Howlin; Miss Marple; Cindy; Alamo-Girl
The five countries include Germany and Japan as well as two countries in Europe and one in Africa that the diplomats would not name. *!* HELLO! *!*
Paging former Ambassador Wilson...
5 posted on
02/05/2004 1:19:02 PM PST by
piasa
(Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
To: knak
Is this the same guy who was on the list of people receiving bribes in the form of oil from Saddam Hussein?
16 posted on
02/05/2004 1:57:50 PM PST by
expatpat
To: knak
I almost added 'WWIII" as a keyword but knock on wood. This is spooky.
29 posted on
02/06/2004 5:32:44 PM PST by
txhurl
To: knak
"Libya for the most part tried to buy its way into the nuclear club," he said. "It was on its way," to getting everything, he added.But visiting Libya, shortly after the story of the U.S./Brit breakthrough broke, didn't El Baralie claim that there wasn't really anything much to the Libya's program, and that it was basically a will 'o the wisp? (Hehehe. 'Rat's and Eurocrats are always trying to run ahead of Bush, but when they get there he's already cleaned up the mess and moved on.)
36 posted on
02/07/2004 3:02:38 PM PST by
Stultis
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson