1 posted on
02/04/2004 2:23:19 PM PST by
Calpernia
To: MJY1288; Calpernia; Grampa Dave; anniegetyourgun; Ernest_at_the_Beach; BOBTHENAILER; Jessamine; ...
Pro Military, Pro Coalition, Pro de-Baathification News!
Today, intelligence professionals have little margin for error. He said the threat of the 21st century is terrorist networks or terrorist states pursuing weapons of mass destruction. The consequences of underestimating a threat could mean the deaths of tens of thousands of people, Rumsfeld said.
Private Mail to be added to or removed from the GNFI (or Pro-Coalition) ping list.
2 posted on
02/04/2004 2:24:41 PM PST by
Calpernia
(http://members.cox.net/classicweb/Heroes/heroes.htm)
To: Calpernia
And there you have it, where the question will rest for many months while the sturm und drang drags on.
3 posted on
02/04/2004 2:29:43 PM PST by
Uncle Miltie
(Mullahs swinging from lamp posts.....)
To: Calpernia
Half the problem here is that we're dealing with talking air-heads who are too ignorant to understand that there is NEVER such a thing as "perfect" intelligence.
4 posted on
02/04/2004 2:36:25 PM PST by
Fenris6
To: Calpernia
I don't know about the rest of you, but I'm sick of the bashing our intelligence community is going through. They are doing the best they can with the limited funds they have received over the years and the way congress has tied their hands.
Intel is an art, not a science (although it contains parts of both) and if they are going to err I would prefer it be on the side of caution. Saddam was a threat to his people and a threat to the US. I would not change a thing. Besides, I STILL believe we will find the WMDs.
7 posted on
02/04/2004 5:13:34 PM PST by
McGavin999
(Evil thrives when good men do nothing!)
To: Calpernia
9 posted on
02/04/2004 6:13:00 PM PST by
OXENinFLA
("We disregard the lessons of history." ----- Patton)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson