Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ARMORED WARFARE: Easy Stick Add-On Armor
News about Armor at StrategyPage.com's How to Make War ^ | February 3, 2004

Posted on 02/03/2004 11:37:44 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4

February 3, 2004: When American troops in Iraq first encountered frequent ambushes and roadside bombs, they realized that their unarmored trucks and hummers were particularly vulnerable. While many rushed to attach armor plates to the vehicles, some of the reserve troops who were cops back home knew of better solutions. At least two firms were selling light weight bulletproof composites that could be quickly attacked to police cars (doors, hood and so on). One type, Aztik 100, consisted of light weight, bendable panels. One side had glue on it, protected by paper that was peeled away when you wanted to attach a panel to a police car, or hummer, door or hood. Another product, RhinoPak, quickly developed a set of rigid lightweight bulletproof panels built to fit right on a hummer, including the top. Bullet proof glass is also provided for the windshield. The composite armor will stop a heavy machine-gun bullet (.50 caliber or 14.5mm. These panels would also stop most fragments from a bomb exploding nearby. As a result of recent reforms, units had money, and authority, available to get these armor kits, and many did.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: armor; armoredwarfare; army; marines; wheeledarmor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
Stick-on armor gets live test in Iraq

Aztik Peel & Stick Instant Armoring System© Flexible Armor Panels

ASI's Peel & Stick Instant Armouring System

Instant Armouring System | Aztik100 Flexible

RhinoPAK™ for the HMMWV

1 posted on 02/03/2004 11:37:44 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ragtime Cowgirl
ping
2 posted on 02/03/2004 11:38:54 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (The road to Glory cannot be followed with too much baggage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4
---The composite armor will stop a heavy machine-gun bullet (.50 caliber or 14.5mm.---

I think I might want to see a live demonstration before signing the check.
3 posted on 02/03/2004 11:48:20 PM PST by claudiustg (Go Sharon! Go Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: demlosers; Matthew James; SLB; Travis McGee; finnman69; archy
ping
4 posted on 02/03/2004 11:48:45 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (The road to Glory cannot be followed with too much baggage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Squantos; harpseal; sneakypete; Thorn11cav; Matthew James; The Shrew; Poohbah
ping
5 posted on 02/03/2004 11:51:53 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (The road to Glory cannot be followed with too much baggage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4
Under a Kerry presidency, these products of a free market economy would need special licences to use after the proper fee is levied. They could only be applied by a union-card holding tecnician and only if the weather is right. But all of this could only happen after the UN signs it off. After all, roadside bombs are a practice of free speech aren't they?
6 posted on 02/03/2004 11:53:38 PM PST by i get it
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk; VeniVidiVici; cavtrooper21; mark502inf; Old Sarge; sauropod; theFIRMbss
ping
7 posted on 02/03/2004 11:58:29 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (The road to Glory cannot be followed with too much baggage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LibKill; Fred Mertz; blanknoone; jriemer; Tailback; Voice in your head; Nebr FAL owner
ping
8 posted on 02/04/2004 12:07:57 AM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (The road to Glory cannot be followed with too much baggage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Qatar-6; ExSoldier; Archangelsk; exnavy; Valin; SJSAMPLE; mystery-ak; Criminal Number 18F
ping
9 posted on 02/04/2004 12:22:00 AM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (The road to Glory cannot be followed with too much baggage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4
but is it available for the home market for the do it yourselfer?
10 posted on 02/04/2004 12:25:46 AM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4
Son of a gun!Amazing.
11 posted on 02/04/2004 12:28:30 AM PST by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ChiefKujo; Eagle Eye; 91B; monie8401; mike1sg; historian1944
ping
12 posted on 02/04/2004 12:30:23 AM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (The road to Glory cannot be followed with too much baggage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
This is amazing:

November 18, 2003: Combat zones are excellent places to test new technologies, especially if it involves experimental items that will save lives. One example is a lightweight armored turret for Humvee vehicles in Iraq. Because of its light weight construction, you cannot put a turret on a Humvee that weighs more than 400 pounds. Armor, even Kevlar fiber armor, can only provide so much protection within the 400 pound limit. But an experimental (meaning expensive to manufacture) nanotech armor was used to construct a 200 pound armor turret that can stop 12.7mm (.50 caliber) bullets. The G-LAM fiber uses nanotecholgy (where magnetism or other forces create customized molecules with special properties.) The nanofiber in the Humvee turrets looks like fiberboard, but it is 17 times stronger than Kevlar (which is itself six times stronger than steel). At the moment, G-LAM costs nearly a thousand dollars per square yard, and it's going to be several years before the cost gets anywhere near Kevlar's levels (about $50 per square yard of fiber). The experimental turrets are being used to see how the material stands up to field conditions (heat, cold, moisture, vibration and so on.) Most Humvees in Iraq are not getting shot at, much less hit, and the Iraqi gunners are not using any heavy machine-guns (like 12.7mm.) But it's easier to test how bullet proof the stuff is on a rifle range, than it is to see what kind of damage day-to-day use in a combat zone will do.

Save-A Gunner (SAG) Hummvee Turret

GARDS™-Guardian™ Antiballistic Replacement Door Skins

13 posted on 02/04/2004 12:46:05 AM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (The road to Glory cannot be followed with too much baggage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4
It is amazing.I want a bomb detecter invented.I'm sick of our guys getting killed and maimed by these low tech roadside bombs.
14 posted on 02/04/2004 12:52:12 AM PST by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4
So, in the interest of "deployability" we send them there unarmored in their shirt sleeves, then the enterprising ones buy their own armor retail and construct it themselves. This is so much more efficient than designing a vehicle using the best technology at affordable prices and then making those ahead of time, because? Because the procurement system is broken, and so is the doctrine of "light".
15 posted on 02/04/2004 12:55:28 AM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4
Next question: Will these composites work for body armor?
16 posted on 02/04/2004 12:57:30 AM PST by Broadside Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
Road Bomb Jammers Being Used In Iraq
17 posted on 02/04/2004 1:03:13 AM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (The road to Glory cannot be followed with too much baggage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: claudiustg
I think I might want to see a live demonstration before signing the check.

With "live" being the operative word.

<)B^)

18 posted on 02/04/2004 1:27:28 AM PST by Erasmus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4
Oh I pray it's so and they can get the items over there soon! God bless our troops!
19 posted on 02/04/2004 2:26:06 AM PST by ETERNAL WARMING (SHUT THE DOOR IN 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4
Easy Stick Add-On Armor

Janet Jackson's Super Bowl outfit?

20 posted on 02/04/2004 2:55:29 AM PST by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson