Pings coming.
1 posted on
02/03/2004 3:24:15 PM PST by
Petronski
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: Howlin
Calling all ping lists.
2 posted on
02/03/2004 3:24:52 PM PST by
Petronski
(I'm not always cranky.)
To: Petronski
If you are in a state which has an open primay, I implore you, for FRentertainment purposes only, to vote for anyone but Kerry. Please, vote for Edwards, Clark or Dean. We want a brokered convention with lots of anti-capitalist nuts protesting in Boston. With Ted Kennedy getting another DUI. And with the Rats fighting and spending millions just to pick a loser. Please, vote for anyone but Kerry. Let's muck them up but good.
3 posted on
02/03/2004 3:25:18 PM PST by
Beck_isright
(" I cannot vote for a liberal whatever his party label happens to be."-Lazamataz, FR 2004)
To: All
It looks as though Edwards will win SC and possibly OK. Kerry looks strong in all other states. But the networks are being very coy about the exit polls they have-but-can't-release.
4 posted on
02/03/2004 3:26:08 PM PST by
Petronski
(I'm not always cranky.)
To: Petronski; All
Thanks for ping
Drudge reporting that battle is in OK between John Kerry and Howard Dean on who in that state
Developing....
5 posted on
02/03/2004 3:26:12 PM PST by
SevenofNine
(Not everybody in it for truth, justice, and the American way=Det Lennie Briscoe)
To: Petronski
Looks like FoxNews got Susan Estrich into the make-up chair again...almost looks good. Had another one of those "Whoa - who's that" moments, until she opened her yap, and there went the needle on the "Yikes!" meter...
8 posted on
02/03/2004 3:28:26 PM PST by
Keith in Iowa
(The only good news for Democrats is they could save $$ by switching to Geico.)
To: Petronski
As a Massachusetts resident, it stinks that John Kerry now has frontrunner status. What is it about humorless and stiff liberals like John Kerry that appeals to so many people across the country. Everybody must think that people like Kerry and Mike Dukakis and Ted Kennedy are representative of people from Massachusetts.
That is not so.
I hope that Kerry loses at least South Carolina and Oklahoma tonight. But it looks like the other five states have been captivated by Kerry for some strange reason. Perhaps all these people exist in some kind of weird alternate universe in which people like John Kerry are actually appealing.
What about Howard Dean? All the fuss made about Dean over the past few months and how he is the unstoppable frontrunner, but when the primaries started, his campaign was dead on arrival. Out of money, out of goofy student volunteers and out of his freepin' mind.
What a shame. Howard Dean would have been a blast at the convention in Boston this summer. That would have been the perfect place for a Howard Dean meltdown. Why couldn't we have heard his rebel yell on that platform? But alas, it was not meant to be.
16 posted on
02/03/2004 3:32:12 PM PST by
SamAdams76
(I got my 401(k) statement - Up 28.02% in 2003 - Thanks to tax cuts and the Bush recovery)
To: Petronski
ahh, I live thread....
17 posted on
02/03/2004 3:32:22 PM PST by
Blue Scourge
(A bill of rights is what the people are entitled to against every government on earth - T. Jefferson)
To: Petronski
Which of these can independents vote in? It'll be interesting to see if a lot of them turn out. If so, it's another negative indicator for Bush.
21 posted on
02/03/2004 3:34:36 PM PST by
lasereye
To: Petronski
"We've lost in Iowa . . .
We've lost in New Hampshire . .
We're going to loose in Arizona . .
loose in Missouri . .
loose in Oklahoma . .
loose in Delaware . . . . .
then we're going on to loose the Whitehouse" 23 posted on
02/03/2004 3:35:29 PM PST by
ChadGore
(Bush 2004 HE'S EARNED IT)
To: Petronski
"We've lost in Iowa . . .
We've lost in New Hampshire . .
We're going to loose in Arizona . .
loose in Missouri . .
loose in Oklahoma . .
loose in Delaware . . . . .
then we're going on to loose the Whitehouse" 24 posted on
02/03/2004 3:35:36 PM PST by
ChadGore
(Bush 2004 HE'S EARNED IT)
To: Petronski
Would it be too much to ask the Admin Moderator to change the title to reflect more accuracy? It should be RAT Primary. I know. I am so mean to the RAT b*st*rds.
37 posted on
02/03/2004 3:40:49 PM PST by
doug from upland
(Don't wait until it is too late to stop Hillary -- do something today!)
To: Petronski
Take Clark out of this race and add even half his numbers to those of Edwards and all of a sudden, it makes sense why the Clintons put Clark up to running. The Clintons DO NOT want Edwards around to rival Hillary in '08.
63 posted on
02/03/2004 3:49:03 PM PST by
randita
To: Petronski
Showtime kiddies. The political junkie equivalent of a few shots of tequila.
To: Petronski
107 posted on
02/03/2004 4:02:25 PM PST by
TomGuy
To: Petronski
I'm here!
Delaware and South Carolina first.
111 posted on
02/03/2004 4:03:56 PM PST by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: Petronski
121 posted on
02/03/2004 4:06:08 PM PST by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: JohnnyZ; Theodore R.; Nathaniel Fischer; AuH2ORepublican; LdSentinal; Kuksool; Coop; ...
*Ping*!
The official thread for tonight's action.
141 posted on
02/03/2004 4:12:23 PM PST by
Pubbie
(We would have the WMDs if Powell and Rice hadn't made a 6 month UN detour)
To: Petronski
Anything coming in from Delaware yet?
171 posted on
02/03/2004 4:21:53 PM PST by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: Petronski
It would seem to me that Edwards winning in S.Carolina is a positive step for the president. The more dems that are fighting for the nomination and picking a state here and there the more they have to fight amongst themselves and spend more money.
By the time the nominee is picked they have aired a lot of their dirty laundry and spent a lot of their cash. JMHO.
To: Petronski
322 posted on
02/03/2004 5:02:25 PM PST by
TomGuy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
