To: m1-lightning
CC laws don't 'regain our rights'..
In fact in a way they agree with the governments position that the RKBA can br infringed by 'reasonable regulations'..
Met any reasonable regulators lately?
Vermont & Alaska's laws are reasonable, no others.. -- And perhaps some day the USSC will be forced to agree with that fact..
17 posted on
02/03/2004 9:37:19 AM PST by
tpaine
(I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but the U.S. Constitution defines a conservative. (writer 33
)
To: tpaine
I would normally agree with you. Colorado is a test case for me however. They failed to get their Rights recognized through the judiciary, yet passed CCW reform laws. Now they have a State rep pushing for a new Bill that institutes Alaska/Vermont style carry laws that would even apply in Denver despite their insistance on being a "home rule" city where even slavery could be re-instituted. If it works, it could be the proof that the "stepping-stone" method does in fact get the job done.
This could be the model for rolling CCW laws into REAL recognition of our Rights.
19 posted on
02/03/2004 9:47:08 AM PST by
Dead Corpse
(For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
To: tpaine
It may not be regaining our full right but it's forward progress. Here's a question: What stops someone from carrying a firearm that's NOT concealed when refering to a state with a CCW clause in it's constitution?
27 posted on
02/03/2004 10:20:42 AM PST by
m1-lightning
(Stop the illegal UFO invasion! Write-in Fox Mulder for President '04)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson