Skip to comments.
How Ketchup Kerry May Win in 2004!
Pinochet
Posted on 02/02/2004 4:48:15 PM PST by pinochet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
The only way a conservative can beat a liberal, is if a liberal speaks honestly about his liberal beliefs.
But if you are dealing with a slick liberal who measures his words carefully, beware.
1
posted on
02/02/2004 4:48:17 PM PST
by
pinochet
To: pinochet
Kerry is winning in the polls because the Democratic primary is what the people are seeing on TV, while President Bush is not visible...
When the general election campaign starts, the polls will reverse, IMHO. That is, if President Bush can stop pissing away conservative votes.
2
posted on
02/02/2004 4:50:49 PM PST
by
SunStar
(Democrats piss me off!)
To: pinochet
Ketchup Kerry is just as slick and slippery as Clinton, "without" the baggage of bimbo eruptions
Not according to some Dem posters on Dem sites, early on in this primary season. I have no idea what they were talking about, but I am guessing they were implying there are some surprises in store for us with Kerry. Any more than that, I don't know and they didn't specifically say.
3
posted on
02/02/2004 4:52:30 PM PST
by
summer
To: pinochet
We need to come together as conservatives, Republicans and Americans. A Bush reelection benefits all of us. This is going to be a battle, no Nader, no Buchanan, Conservative versus liberal begging the "independents to side with us. This is going to be ugly!
4
posted on
02/02/2004 4:56:07 PM PST
by
jstolarczyk
(jstolarczyk)
To: pinochet
"without the baggage of bimbo eruptions."
I have nothing on this but a hunch. Does this man give anybody the sense that he is a standup straight arrow?
Honesty and integrity do not immediatedly come to mind in this mans' professional life, which may cast some doubt as to the remainder of this mans existence.
5
posted on
02/02/2004 4:56:07 PM PST
by
petertare
(truth, justice and the American way)
To: pinochet
"without the baggage of bimbo eruptions."
I have nothing on this but a hunch. Does this man give anybody the sense that he is a standup straight arrow?
Honesty and integrity do not immediatedly come to mind in this mans' professional life, which may cast some doubt as to the remainder of this mans existence.
6
posted on
02/02/2004 4:56:12 PM PST
by
petertare
(truth, justice and the American way)
To: pinochet
How Ketchup Kerry May Win in 2004?
Fools, idiots, voter fraud, communists, leftists.
7
posted on
02/02/2004 4:56:25 PM PST
by
sport
To: pinochet
Given the general public's dimwitted fixation on height as a measure of a fella's worth, Kerry has a good chance. Gore came close.
To: pinochet
I am sure that many of you were shocked, by the CNN poll showing J. Ketchup Kerry beating President Bush in a poll I wasn't. I expected it. 24/7 coverage of the wonders of Kerry will push any poll his way. That poll reflects where we are in the process...all DemonRats all the time.
Stay tuned.
To: petertare
Sean Hannity claims to have a letter in his upcoming book that will give Kerry grief. Not if it doesn't get reported anywhere but FOX.
10
posted on
02/02/2004 4:58:48 PM PST
by
jstolarczyk
(jstolarczyk)
To: pinochet
If you think about it, Kerry couldn't even beat Dean. Kerry was in single digits before Dean began to self-destruct.
11
posted on
02/02/2004 5:04:28 PM PST
by
dano1
To: jstolarczyk
"...This is going to be a battle, no Nader, no Buchanan..."
You can say that again. Remember that Nader had 2 million votes, compared to 500,000 for Buchanan. And Buchanan's supporters are that group of right-wingers opposed to the Iraq war.
When you factor in Al Gore's 500,000 advantage in the popular vote, Bush will have to overcome a deficit of over 2.5 million votes from 2000.
Bush's only hope lies in mobilizing an estimated 3 million religious conservatives who stayed home in the 2000 elections. That won't be easy.
12
posted on
02/02/2004 5:07:20 PM PST
by
pinochet
To: pinochet
Bush hasn't started campaigning yet. I'll take all comers at 2:1 money.
13
posted on
02/02/2004 5:07:49 PM PST
by
Uncle Miltie
(Mullahs swinging from lamp posts.....)
To: rageaholic
"...Given the general public's dimwitted fixation on height as a measure of a fella's worth, Kerry has a good chance..."
Don't forget the hair. Last year, there was some speculation that Kerry stood a good chance of being elected, because he has "presidential hair".
You can understand why the founding fathers wanted to restrict the franchise, because they wanted to limit the number of dummies on the voters' rolls.
14
posted on
02/02/2004 5:11:00 PM PST
by
pinochet
To: jstolarczyk
Don't count Nader out yet. Good chance he'll run if Kerry is the nominee.
15
posted on
02/02/2004 5:13:03 PM PST
by
squidly
(Money is inconvenient for them: give them victuals and an arse-clout, it is enough.)
To: pinochet
The only reason the DEMO(N)cRATS are suring in the polls is because their primary is taking place.
I now understand the absolute brilliance of Karl Rove in holding the GOP convention as close to the election as possible.
The American public has such a short little span of attention, it ain't even gonna be close.
The only thing they will remember is the last thing they saw.
The GOP.
16
posted on
02/02/2004 5:20:44 PM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Drug prohibition laws help fund terrorism.)
To: jstolarczyk
Not if it doesn't get reported anywhere but FOX.If it hits Drudge it will.
17
posted on
02/02/2004 5:21:45 PM PST
by
demlosers
(<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com">Miserable Failure</a>)
To: pinochet
by the CNN poll showing J. Ketchup Kerry beating President Bush in a pollPuhleese. The republicans & GW haven't even BEGUN to campaign yet.
18
posted on
02/02/2004 5:28:05 PM PST
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I will defend to your death my right to say it)
Comment #19 Removed by Moderator
To: SunStar
"That is, if President Bush can stop pissing away conservative votes."
This is precisely Bushes problem. He has alienated many that voted for him (I worked on his campaign!) by giving us "Leftist Lite" in the form of support for continuation of the assault weapons ban, proposing amnesty for illegals, refusing to protect our border, and massively increasing spending. He's gonna have to do a complete 180 to have the slimmest hope of getting my vote. He's completely betrayed his conservative base, and is not acting like the guy who four years ago promised us smaller government.
I'll be writing in Tom Tancredo for President. And if that means that John Kerry is our next president, so what? I'm not seeing a lot of difference between any of the candidates, 'Pub or 'Rat. And at least if we had a 'Rat in office, maybe Congress would pull its collective testicles out of the box they've been storedin for the last four years and actually say "no" to alot of the BS a Kerry (or a Bush, or a Dean) would try to do.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson