Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democratic candidates back off gun control
Times Record News ^ | 02/02/04 | LANCE GAY

Posted on 02/02/2004 12:12:53 PM PST by m1-lightning

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: Hank Rearden
I know Dubya supported the reautorization of the ban in 2000 and hinted at it in 2002. I hope he just lets it die without anyone making conflict before it happens. (he didn't mantion it in the SOTU) If he does mention it then it's high time we send some letters of disapproval to change his mind.
21 posted on 02/02/2004 12:35:48 PM PST by m1-lightning (Stop the illegal UFO invasion! Write-in Fox Mulder for President '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: m1-lightning
Not a "spokesperson", but he did support the NRA and regularly received "A" ratings and endorsements from them (as well as money) until he decided in '88 to run for president. At that point he basically flip-flopped on 99% of the stances he took to get elected.
22 posted on 02/02/2004 12:42:46 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: m1-lightning
Call me paranoid but I'm betting the AWB extension gets tied to the Patriot act in a bi-partisan "Anti-terrorism" package.
23 posted on 02/02/2004 12:44:29 PM PST by rastus macgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: m1-lightning
Boy they have me convinced!
24 posted on 02/02/2004 12:44:51 PM PST by Ches ("old enough to remember when the air was clean and sex was dirty")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rastus macgill
Don't give them any ideas.
25 posted on 02/02/2004 12:45:19 PM PST by Dead Corpse (For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants; Hank Rearden; rastus macgill
I doubt it will go anywhere. This is all the support it's recieved since May of last year:

S.1034 (A bill to repeal the sunset date on the assault weapons ban)

Sponsor: Sen Feinstein, Dianne [CA]
Sen Boxer, Barbara[CA]
Sen Chafee, Lincoln D.[RI]
Sen Clinton, Hillary Rodham[NY]
Sen DeWine, Michael[OH]
Sen Durbin, Richard J.[IL]
Sen Jeffords, James M.[VT]
Sen Kennedy, Edward M.[MA]
Sen Kerry, John F.[MA]
Sen Lautenberg, Frank R.[NJ]
Sen Levin, Carl[MI]
Sen Reed, John F.[RI]
Sen Schumer, Charles E.[NY]

26 posted on 02/02/2004 12:47:13 PM PST by m1-lightning (Stop the illegal UFO invasion! Write-in Fox Mulder for President '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Hank Rearden
I thought the AWB had already sunset...

Nope. Scheduled to expire this fall, though. I believe Bush Jr. has indicated he'll sign a renewal if Congress is stupid enough to pass one.

At that point, he'll not only lose the election; he'll be beaten like a rented mule.

I have repeatdly emailed Bush at the WH that if he signs an AWB renewal he is toast. I personally will not vote for him.

27 posted on 02/02/2004 12:48:09 PM PST by kt56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: m1-lightning
Nobody in their right mind would fall for this ratty chameleon act.
28 posted on 02/02/2004 12:48:51 PM PST by LibWhacker (<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com/">Miserable Failure</a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: m1-lightning
Can't help but notice both of the rat bastard commies from Smuggler's Cove are on that list.

No wonder they never set foot in their native Rhode Island.
29 posted on 02/02/2004 12:55:17 PM PST by the gillman@blacklagoon.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: m1-lightning
It sunsets this August.
30 posted on 02/02/2004 12:59:48 PM PST by demlosers (<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com">Miserable Failure</a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: m1-lightning
I wouldn't believe ANYTHING the rats say, but I'd watch EVERYTHING they do. To get an indication of what they may do if in office, look at their history.

These people are pathological liars, just like the terrorist scum that keep threatening us.
31 posted on 02/02/2004 1:01:13 PM PST by appalachian_dweller (Dear Daleel & EOM, May the fleas of 1000 camels infest your armpits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Don't worry about the AWB. The Democrats know that if they push the issue too hard, it could hurt them by energizing more 2nd Amendment supporters into voting. The Republicans know if they push it, the opposite is true. House Majority Leader Tom Delay has said that the AWB is going to be DOA in the House. He will never let it out of committee and even if it managed to sneak out, there are no where near enough votes to pass it.
32 posted on 02/02/2004 1:06:09 PM PST by COEXERJ145
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: appalachian_dweller
These people are pathological liars

Well, sure they are! The sad thing is that there are so many centrists out there that neither question them nor disbeleieve their quotes. Dean Vs. Dean is all the evidence I need.

33 posted on 02/02/2004 1:11:48 PM PST by m1-lightning (Stop the illegal UFO invasion! Write-in Fox Mulder for President '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: m1-lightning
I know Dubya supported the reautorization of the ban in 2000 and hinted at it in 2002. I hope he just lets it die without anyone making conflict before it happens.

As Bush's re-election prospects become a bit more precarious, the odds increase that the Assault Weapon Ban will expire.

At one time it looked like the Democrats would nominate a hard-left crazy (e.g., Dean or Clark), and that Bush would consequently achieve a landslide victory with huge coattails to pad Republican margins in the House and Senate. Under those circumstances, Bush would have continued moving to the left, to occupy the political center which the Democrats were abdicating. Therefore Bush would have pushed hard for reauthorization of the AW Ban, on the theory that it would attract some moderate independent and Democratic votes while still leaving conservatives with no place else to go.

But the rise of candidates like Kerry and Clark, combined with the bubbling dissatisfaction of conservatives over run-away federal spending, have altered the political landscape. Bush now has to worry about placating and energizing his base, rather than ignoring his base in a quest for marginal voters in the middle.

Bush can't afford the political fallout from signing a reauthorization of the AW Ban, but neither can he stand the heat from a veto. So he'll quietly pass the word to the Republican House leadership that it's okay with him if they bury the bill. This will give him plausible deniability when the AW Ban lapses.

Of course Bush will be attacked by the gun-control crowd for not doing enough to force the AW Ban through, and some Republican moderates will be hurt (especially non-incumbent challengers for Senate and House seats in swing districts). But at this point Bush is more interested in just getting re-elected than in orchestrating a landslide victory.

So if you are against the Assault Weapon Ban, keep hoping for a close Presidential contest.

34 posted on 02/02/2004 1:13:45 PM PST by dpwiener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: rastus macgill
I'm betting it sunsets. The RATS remember the massacare of 1994 when they lost Congress. They don't want a replay. Bush has no conviction for signing the AWB despite what you may read on FR. Say good riddance to AWB.
35 posted on 02/02/2004 1:14:39 PM PST by demlosers (<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com">Miserable Failure</a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: dpwiener
But the rise of candidates like Kerry and Clark

I meant Kerry and Edwards.

36 posted on 02/02/2004 1:15:39 PM PST by dpwiener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: m1-lightning
That's a pretty good Marxist Senator lineup. AWB even has less of a chance of passing in the House.
37 posted on 02/02/2004 1:18:53 PM PST by demlosers (<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com">Miserable Failure</a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: m1-lightning
S.1034 (A bill to repeal the sunset date on the assault weapons ban)

Sponsor: Sen Feinstein, Dianne [CA]
Sen Boxer, Barbara[CA]
Sen Chafee, Lincoln D.[RI]
Sen Clinton, Hillary Rodham[NY]
Sen DeWine, Michael[OH]
Sen Durbin, Richard J.[IL]
Sen Jeffords, James M.[VT]
Sen Kennedy, Edward M.[MA]
Sen Kerry, John F.[MA]
Sen Lautenberg, Frank R.[NJ]
Sen Levin, Carl[MI]
Sen Reed, John F.[RI]
Sen Schumer, Charles E.[NY]

Rat Kerry looks vulnerable here... :)

38 posted on 02/02/2004 1:25:06 PM PST by demlosers (<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com">Miserable Failure</a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

Here's the House supporters for the AW Ban:

Rep Abercrombie, Neil [HI-1]
Rep Ackerman, Gary L. [NY-5]
Rep Andrews, Robert E. [NJ-1]
Rep Becerra, Xavier [CA-31]
Rep Berman, Howard L. [CA-28]
Rep Bishop, Timothy H. [NY-1]
Rep Blumenauer, Earl [OR-3]
Rep Brady, Robert [PA-1]
Rep Brown, Corrine [FL-3]
Rep Capps, Lois [CA-23]
Rep Capuano, Michael E. [MA-8]
Rep Cardin, Benjamin L. [MD-3]
Rep Carson, Julia [IN-7]
Rep Case, Ed [HI-2]
Rep Clay, Wm. Lacy [MO-1]
Rep Conyers, John, Jr. [MI-14]
Rep Crowley, Joseph [NY-7]
Rep Cummings, Elijah E. [MD-7]
Rep Davis, Danny K. [IL-7]
Rep DeGette, Diana [CO-1]
Rep Delahunt, William D. [MA-10]
Rep DeLauro, Rosa L. [CT-3]
Rep Deutsch, Peter [FL-20]
Rep Emanuel, Rahm [IL-5]
Rep Engel, Eliot L. [NY-17]
Rep Eshoo, Anna G. [CA-14]
Rep Farr, Sam [CA-17] Rep Fattah, Chaka [PA-2]
Rep Filner, Bob [CA-51]
Rep Frank, Barney [MA-4]
Rep Gephardt, Richard A. [MO-3]
Rep Gonzalez, Charles A. [TX-20]
Rep Grijalva, Raul M. [AZ-7]
Rep Gutierrez, Luis V.[IL-4]
Rep Harman, Jane [CA-36]
Rep Hastings, Alcee L.[FL-23]
Rep Hoeffel, Joseph M.[PA-13]
Rep Holt, Rush D. [NJ-12]
Rep Honda, Michael M.[CA-15]
Rep Hoyer, Steny H. [MD-5]
Rep Israel, Steve [NY-2]
Rep Jackson, Jesse L., Jr. [IL-2]
Rep Jackson-Lee, Sheila [TX-18]
Rep Johnson, Eddie Bernice[TX-30]
Rep Jones, Stephanie Tubbs [OH-11]
Rep Kennedy, Patrick J. [RI-1]
Rep Kleczka, Gerald D. [WI-4]
Rep Kucinich, Dennis J. [OH-10]
Rep Langevin, James R. - [RI-2]
Rep Lantos, Tom [CA-12]
Rep Larson, John B. [CT-1]
Rep Lee, Barbara [CA-9]
Rep Lewis, John [GA-5]
Rep Lipinski, William O. [IL-3]
Rep Lofgren, Zoe[CA-16]
Rep Lowey, Nita M. [NY-18]
Rep Maloney, Carolyn B.[NY-14]
Rep Markey, Edward J. [MA-7]
Rep Matsui, Robert T.[CA-5]
Rep McCollum, Betty [MN-4]
Rep McDermott, Jim [WA-7]
Rep McGovern, James P. [MA-3]
Rep Meehan, Martin T. [MA-5]
Rep Meeks, Gregory W. [NY-6]
Rep Menendez, Robert [NJ-13]
Rep Millender-McDonald, Juanita [CA-37]
Rep Miller, George [CA-7]
Rep Moran, James P. [VA-8]
Rep Nadler, Jerrold [NY-8]
Rep Napolitano, Grace F. [CA-38]
Rep Norton, Eleanor Holmes [DC]
Rep Olver, John W. [MA-1]
Rep Owens, Major R. [NY-11]
Rep Pallone, Frank, Jr. [NJ-6]
Rep Pascrell, Bill, Jr. [NJ-8]
Rep Pastor, Ed [AZ-4]
Rep Payne, Donald M. [NJ-10]
Rep Price, David E. [NC-4]
Rep Rangel, Charles B. [NY-15]
Rep Rothman, Steve R. [NJ-9]
Rep Roybal-Allard, Lucille [CA-34]
Rep Ruppersberger, C. A. Dutch[MD-2]
Rep Rush, Bobby L. [IL-1]
Rep Sabo, Martin Olav [MN-5]
Rep Sanchez, Linda T.[CA-39]
Rep Sanchez, Loretta [CA-47]
Rep Schakowsky, Janice D. [IL-9]
Rep Schiff, Adam B. [CA-29]
Rep Serrano, Jose E.[NY-16]
Rep Shays, Christopher [CT-4]
Rep Sherman, Brad [CA-27]
Rep Slaughter, Louise McIntosh[NY-28]
Rep Smith, Christopher H. [NJ-4]
Rep Solis, Hilda L. [CA-32]
Rep Stark, Fortney Pete [CA-13]
Rep Tauscher, Ellen O. [CA-10]
Rep Tierney, John F. [MA-6]
Rep Towns, Edolphus [NY-10]
Rep Van Hollen, Chris [MD-8]
Rep Velazquez, Nydia M. [NY-12]
Rep Waters, Maxine [CA-35]
Rep Watson, Diane E. [CA-33]
Rep Watt, Melvin L. [NC-12]
Rep Waxman, Henry A. [CA-30]
Rep Weiner, Anthony D. [NY-9]
Rep Wexler, Robert [FL-19]
Rep Woolsey, Lynn C. [CA-6]
Rep Wynn, Albert Russell [MD-4]
Rep Kind, Ron - 9/3/2003(withdrawn - 9/16/2003) [WI-3]

39 posted on 02/02/2004 1:32:07 PM PST by m1-lightning (Stop the illegal UFO invasion! Write-in Fox Mulder for President '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
Here's the House suppoort for the AW ban.

Considering the number of Reps from California who support the measure, I'm surprised Illinois is beating Cali in the way of citywide handgun bans.

40 posted on 02/02/2004 1:34:20 PM PST by m1-lightning (Stop the illegal UFO invasion! Write-in Fox Mulder for President '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson