Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CyberAnt
Nah!! She wants to be President, not a Chief Justice. A Chief Justice cannot write executive orders.

No more campaigning, no more fundraising, she would devote all of her attention to rewriting our laws - for the rest of her life.

15 posted on 02/01/2004 1:37:37 AM PST by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: HAL9000
While that may be true .. think about this: As a Chief justice, in order to get the laws passed, she has to have a majority of the group on her side .. and that's not always a reasonable assumption. Also .. like I said .. as President she can RULE BY EXECUTIVE ORDER - AND CHANGE LAWS WITH THE STROKE OF HER PEN.

For a power hungry person .. which would you choose ..??
25 posted on 02/01/2004 2:01:36 AM PST by CyberAnt ("America is the GREATEST NATION on the face of the earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
But don't Supreme Court justices still have to be confirmed by the Senate? If so, I can't imagine that happening after the Democrats' behavior regarding the nomination of Estrada, Pickering, etc.
56 posted on 02/01/2004 2:54:28 AM PST by IrishRainy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson