Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Robots for No Man's Land
WashingtonPost.com ^ | Friday, January 30, 2004 | Yuki Noguchi

Posted on 01/31/2004 1:36:27 AM PST by yhwhsman

Robots for No Man's Land
Defense Companies Developing the 'Brains' to Remake War

By Yuki Noguchi
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, January 30, 2004; Page E01

The education of Stryker, an 18-ton military monster truck, begins in the warehouse lab of General Dynamics in Westminster, Md.

There, Stryker, one of the U.S. Army's newest infantry vehicles, is fitted with a "ladar" scanner, the equivalent of a mounted pair of eyes that see by emitting 400,000 laser and radar beams and snap 120 camera images every second. Its brain -- a 40-pound computer system tucked inside its body -- processes that data, and makes instant judgments on how to act and where to go.

The eight-wheeled Stryker has already seen service in Iraq as an armored troop carrier with human drivers. The idea is to teach Stryker to accomplish a mission on its own, as a robot. By 2010, robotic Strykers and similar contrivances are slated to be in use as all-purpose battlefield vehicles, surveying battlegrounds, sniffing for land mines, or transporting supplies and troops to the front line.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: battlefield; generaldynamics; machines; military; robot; stryker; usarmy
Cool technology they're working on, though I find the idea of a 'war' without a human being on the battlefield rather odd.
1 posted on 01/31/2004 1:36:28 AM PST by yhwhsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: archy
Interesting possiblity for the Stryker. Thought you might be interested.
2 posted on 01/31/2004 1:38:22 AM PST by yhwhsman ("Never give in--never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small..." -Sir Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yhwhsman
An unmanned stryker is still a bloated and costly program, part of the Future Combat System fromBoeing/SAIC, United Defense, General Dynamics land systems. Get a taste of some other unmanned ground vehicles here. There is a picture floating on the net of an entry robot wielding a HK MP-5!
3 posted on 01/31/2004 2:41:13 AM PST by endthematrix (To enter my lane you must use your turn signal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
An unmanned Stryker is part of the military's effort to move more machines into battle to save both money and lives. "Well before the end of the century, there will be no people on the battlefield," said Robert Finkelstein, a professor at the University of Maryland's School of Management and Technology.

Companies throughout the defense industry, among them United Defense LP of Arlington, Lockheed Martin Corp. of Bethesda and the smaller Gaithersburg-based Robotics Research LLC, are developing robotic systems to fill a variety of military functions. For General Dynamics' robotic systems department, making robot brains -- called autonomous navigation systems -- represents the largest business deal in the unit's 14-year history. In November, it won a $185 million award to develop between 30 and 60 automated-navigation prototypes that can be fitted onto vehicles of different size and function, not just Stryker vehicles.

Creating automated navigation systems for combat vehicles is part of the Future Combat System project to remake warfare. The Army plans to spend $14.78 billion on a new combat system over the next six years, of which autonomous navigation systems is one part, according to Maj. Gary Tallman, public affairs officer for the Army.

Founded in 1990 as F&M Manufacturing, the Westminster plant where Stryker's brain is being developed started out designing small, remote-controlled vehicles. Over time, the 80,000-square-foot facility made robots that sorted mail, read bar codes and packaged pharmaceuticals. General Dynamics purchased F&M, which employs 268 people, for an undisclosed amount of money in 1995.

Using autonomous machines in the military became possible in the mid-1980s, when computer processors became faster. In the 1990s, the development of improved sensor technology allowed machines to pick up more information about their environment. Now, autonomous systems can keep track of their whereabouts using global-positioning satellite links, and talk to comrades and commanders through wireless links that shut off automatically if the signal is in danger of being intercepted.

The first unmanned military vehicles made in the early 1980s by the Defense Department were huge vans the size of UPS delivery trucks, filled with hundreds of pounds of clunky computers that could barely navigate at 5 miles an hour in relatively flat terrain. By comparison, Stryker can navigate through forests and desert environments, or drive on the road at top speeds of 60 miles an hour.

Even with these developments, robots still have a lot to learn.

4 posted on 01/31/2004 9:55:59 AM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (The road to Glory cannot be followed with too much baggage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr; ALOHA RONNIE; American in Israel; American Soldier; archy; armymarinemom; BCR #226; ...
Stryker Ping
5 posted on 01/31/2004 9:58:30 AM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (The road to Glory cannot be followed with too much baggage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4; archy
I'm still not all that hot about this stryker.

Our guys deserve our best. I'm not sure this stryker is our best, not by what the armor guys on FR tell me.

6 posted on 01/31/2004 10:07:07 AM PST by LibKill (My sigil: Two crossed, dead, Frenchmen emblazoned on a mound of dead Frenchmen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: yhwhsman
Cool technology they're working on, though I find the idea of a 'war' without a human being on the battlefield rather odd.

Skynet is now.

7 posted on 01/31/2004 10:07:26 AM PST by jriemer (We are a Republic not a Democracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4
By comparison, Stryker can navigate through forests and desert environments, or drive on the road at top speeds of 60 miles an hour.

Until it flips over due to unstable road shoulders, throws a few tires, or tries to turn.
Better a bot trying that than a human manned vehicle.
8 posted on 01/31/2004 10:31:09 AM PST by Darksheare (The voices in YOUR head are talking to ME!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: yhwhsman
Waiting to see how the Stryker is going to handle the other area of deployement too.
9 posted on 01/31/2004 10:48:00 AM PST by armymarinemom (My Son Liberated the Honor Roll Students in Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibKill
Well, dog or not, Strykers are a done deal. Barring some kind of massive coup in DOD we are going to have six Stryker Brigades whether they are worth having or not.

Everything I know about the vehicle I got off the internet. A lot of what is on the internet is not very reassuring, but much of that is because of the agendas of the people posting the negative information. On the other hand, the Army and General Dynamics will definitely blow smoke up your butt, so in the end you have to rely on your own judgement in figuring out who to believe.

I was an armor guy a long time ago. Eight-wheeled armored cars have their uses. You can put computer monitor screens in them, and give them internet connections, and email, and Blue Force Tracker, and Remote Weapons Stations, and you still only have an eight-wheeled armor car that you don't dare get wet lest you fry the electronics.

10 posted on 01/31/2004 11:08:30 AM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (The road to Glory cannot be followed with too much baggage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: yhwhsman
Cool technology they're working on, though I find the idea of a 'war' without a
human being on the battlefield rather odd.


Putting a unmanned aerial vehicle with a Hellfire missle at risk against
Islamo-fascists works for me.

Right now I'd wish NASA was teaching the military about making/using small robots to
search out Osama in a cave somewhere or to seek/destroy the rat-b@$tards
building IEDs or blowing up oil lines in Iraq.

Of course, that would get the knickers of peace-utopians in a knot...
turning space technology into peace-winning technology here on earth.
11 posted on 01/31/2004 11:13:47 AM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson