|
|
Posted on 01/29/2004 5:54:35 PM PST by Jim Robinson
Will Bush solve the illegal immigration problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the government spending problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the campaign finance problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the drug war problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the nation's education problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the so-called healthcare problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the so-called environmental problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the social security problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the medicare problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush defend America from those bent on destroying her? You'd better bet your sweet bippy he will.
Will any of the Democrats defend America? Hell no they won't. They'd rather turn us over to the U.N. They'd surrender to the French Foreign Legion if given the chance.
Will Bush appoint conservative judges? Yup!
Will Kerry, Edwards, Clark, Hillary, et al, appoint conservative judges? Yeah, right. And hell will freeze over tomorrow.
Will Bush continue reducing taxes? Yup.
Will Kerry, Edwards, Clark, Hillary, et al, raise your taxes as soon as they possibly can if given the opportunity and continue raising them until hell freezes over? Yup.
Will Bush defend the right to life? Check
Will Bush defend marriage between a man a woman? Check
Will Bush defend the right to keep and bear arms? Check
Will Bush say no to Kyoto? Check.
Will Bush say no to a world court? Check.
Will Bush say no to the U.N.? Check.
Will Kerry, Edwards, Clark, Hillary, et al, remove our national sovereignty and subjugate America to world government? Just as quickly as they possibly can if given the opportunity.
Will any other person be elected to the Presidency in 2004 other than Bush (God willing) or a Democrat? Obviously not.
Doesn't make a lick of sense to me to allow the America hating, freedom hating Democrats back into power now that we've kicked them out.
Say yes to sovereignty for America and continued freedom for all Americans.
Say no to the RATS!!
Where do you derive that, not from your links. He was a big influence on Reagan and his philosophy of government.
Goldwater was strictly a "fiscal" conservative and not really all that dogmatic on the principle.
Again, I don't get that - unless it is your proposition that a conservative should advocate government involvement to solve social issues.
He NEVER went after the true liberals; he just attacked those "country club" republicans in class warfare rhetoric that would have made Marx blush.
Unsubstantiated - he was critical of the influence of religious organizations transforming the Republican party into a tool for enforcing religious change upon the government and politics.
He had a very good point there. It is contrary to the goals of a democratic republic and in the long run, he feared it would weaken the party as it drove the center away.
I'm okay with that.
I concur.
|
|
That's part of the point. One of the argument's of those of us who are accused of being bushbots is that no candidate or office-holder can be 100% in agreement with anyone. It's the overall job that matters.
If he took YOUR approach all of the social conservative "base" would scream
Yep. and if he doesn't then you and your fellow libertarian brethren would scream just as loud.
Them's fightin' words - libertarian. The ONLY thing Bush can do is what he feels is right and let the "base" scream. I like that in the guy
And so do many of us here - but it means not being a "true conservative" which starts the whole furball over again.
I have not now, nor have I ever, any personal disagreements with you. In fact, I have always enjoyed our dicsussions.
But if you wish to make a point... then make your point.
Meaning no offense -- you haven't advanced any Arguments, you've only claimed that I have "failed" in my "training". Well... I am Trained in the School of Jerry Falwell, "nopardons", and I have always relished our success (the backwoods, buck-toothed, redneck Baptists of Liberty University are actually the most sucessful Debate Program in American History) against the Atheists and Humanists of the Ivy League.
So if you wish to make a point... then make your point.
I'll gladly discuss any subject you wish to entertain... but unless you advance an Argument, I'm not likely to take your "criticisms" of my "training" very seriously, if you haven't proclaimed the Cause of Fundamentalism against the ramparts of the Ivy League... as I have.
Cordially, OP
That was NOT meant as an insult, if you took it that way I am very sorry. However your views on social issues are decidedly libertarian in philosophy and I share a few of them.
Go Arne Go
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.