Posted on 01/29/2004 5:54:35 PM PST by Jim Robinson
Will Bush solve the illegal immigration problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the government spending problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the campaign finance problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the drug war problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the nation's education problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the so-called healthcare problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the so-called environmental problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the social security problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the medicare problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush defend America from those bent on destroying her? You'd better bet your sweet bippy he will.
Will any of the Democrats defend America? Hell no they won't. They'd rather turn us over to the U.N. They'd surrender to the French Foreign Legion if given the chance.
Will Bush appoint conservative judges? Yup!
Will Kerry, Edwards, Clark, Hillary, et al, appoint conservative judges? Yeah, right. And hell will freeze over tomorrow.
Will Bush continue reducing taxes? Yup.
Will Kerry, Edwards, Clark, Hillary, et al, raise your taxes as soon as they possibly can if given the opportunity and continue raising them until hell freezes over? Yup.
Will Bush defend the right to life? Check
Will Bush defend marriage between a man a woman? Check
Will Bush defend the right to keep and bear arms? Check
Will Bush say no to Kyoto? Check.
Will Bush say no to a world court? Check.
Will Bush say no to the U.N.? Check.
Will Kerry, Edwards, Clark, Hillary, et al, remove our national sovereignty and subjugate America to world government? Just as quickly as they possibly can if given the opportunity.
Will any other person be elected to the Presidency in 2004 other than Bush (God willing) or a Democrat? Obviously not.
Doesn't make a lick of sense to me to allow the America hating, freedom hating Democrats back into power now that we've kicked them out.
Say yes to sovereignty for America and continued freedom for all Americans.
Say no to the RATS!!
I guess the threads weren't that memorable. I recognize many posters, but for whatever reason you're not one of them.
Main Entry: blas·phe·myUnless you meant meaning 2. But is Laz showing 'irreverence toward something considered sacred or inviolable'? Did you mean there's something sacred about the current president?
Pronunciation: 'blas-f&-mE
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural -mies
1 a : the act of insulting or showing contempt or lack of reverence for God b : the act of claiming the attributes of deity
2 : irreverence toward something considered sacred or inviolable
Again .. you're all heart
No, I prefer to think I picked up Ron Paul. We'll make it a team effort.
You know, I think you just want Dubya to get elected to keep him safely out of Texas.
Not sure what you mean? Me personally, or the site in general?
Not in the end it won't. Trust me on this.
Thanks for the defense, FRiend, but I found that the tagline was distracting more than anything, so I retired it.
So the answer for you is to join with the socialists and get the real thing elected?
CT wrote a great rant a while back explaining the division of the people. How the candidate must attract the centralist to get elected and then finally in the second term is free to govern as they choose. Since I got a new computer, I no longer have that wonderfully written explanation.....CT do you still have it and would you please repost it for our friend Laz and all others who would benefit?
You mean, after death. Fine, I'll leave that matter to the authority in those matters -- G-d.
But in the meantime, on Earth, magnitude matters.
Wait a minute , are you calling me a bad name?
I demand an apology!!!
YEAAAAAAAAEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
At least the front runners are from the Northeast (you know, close to Canada) cause god knows the last two offerings out of Texas (LBJ and Dubya) have been disasters. Guess they just have a surplus of a$$holes there.
Yep, saw it - nice job, Neets, and that's a good start to the the 'he ain't perfect so he's a liberal' list.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.