Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

VANITY: The best way to keep America a sovereign free nation is to keep the Democrats out of power!
Free Republic

Posted on 01/29/2004 5:54:35 PM PST by Jim Robinson

Will Bush solve the illegal immigration problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.

Will Bush solve the government spending problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.

Will Bush solve the campaign finance problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.

Will Bush solve the drug war problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.

Will Bush solve the nation's education problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.

Will Bush solve the so-called healthcare problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.

Will Bush solve the so-called environmental problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.

Will Bush solve the social security problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.

Will Bush solve the medicare problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.

Will Bush defend America from those bent on destroying her? You'd better bet your sweet bippy he will.

Will any of the Democrats defend America? Hell no they won't. They'd rather turn us over to the U.N. They'd surrender to the French Foreign Legion if given the chance.

Will Bush appoint conservative judges? Yup!

Will Kerry, Edwards, Clark, Hillary, et al, appoint conservative judges? Yeah, right. And hell will freeze over tomorrow.

Will Bush continue reducing taxes? Yup.

Will Kerry, Edwards, Clark, Hillary, et al, raise your taxes as soon as they possibly can if given the opportunity and continue raising them until hell freezes over? Yup.

Will Bush defend the right to life? Check

Will Bush defend marriage between a man a woman? Check

Will Bush defend the right to keep and bear arms? Check

Will Bush say no to Kyoto? Check.

Will Bush say no to a world court? Check.

Will Bush say no to the U.N.? Check.

Will Kerry, Edwards, Clark, Hillary, et al, remove our national sovereignty and subjugate America to world government? Just as quickly as they possibly can if given the opportunity.

Will any other person be elected to the Presidency in 2004 other than Bush (God willing) or a Democrat? Obviously not.

Doesn't make a lick of sense to me to allow the America hating, freedom hating Democrats back into power now that we've kicked them out.

Say yes to sovereignty for America and continued freedom for all Americans.

Say no to the RATS!!


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: electionpresident; gwb2004; jimroblist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 1,261-1,271 next last
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Sheep??? Well I hear all there is in the constitution party is dysfunctional post adolescents who have been taking Ritalin for far too many years.
461 posted on 01/29/2004 8:36:03 PM PST by MJY1288 (WITHOUT DOUBLE STANDARDS, LIBERALS WOULDN'T HAVE ANY !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
You have an exceeedingly bad memory. You and I have shared amnahy a thread and many a reply here.

I guess the threads weren't that memorable. I recognize many posters, but for whatever reason you're not one of them.

462 posted on 01/29/2004 8:36:09 PM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 454 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan; Lazamataz
Change your tagline. It's blasphemy.

Not precisely.

Merriam-Webster:

Main Entry: blas·phe·my
Pronunciation: 'blas-f&-mE
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural -mies
1 a : the act of insulting or showing contempt or lack of reverence for God b : the act of claiming the attributes of deity
2 : irreverence toward something considered sacred or inviolable
Unless you meant meaning 2. But is Laz showing 'irreverence toward something considered sacred or inviolable'? Did you mean there's something sacred about the current president?
463 posted on 01/29/2004 8:36:18 PM PST by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
I view the losses from World War Two to have much more objective societal impact on the United States than those of the World Trade Center.

Again .. you're all heart

464 posted on 01/29/2004 8:36:47 PM PST by Mo1 (Join the dollar a day crowd now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 416 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
OMG, are we back to World War II now? Are we going to have to listen to how much better the Democrats handled that war than Bush has handled this war, so it wouldn't be all tha bad if a Democrat was president?
465 posted on 01/29/2004 8:37:04 PM PST by Howlin (http://www.icomm.ca/dragon/image/hbook3.gif)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 397 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
You have already dropped Harry?

No, I prefer to think I picked up Ron Paul. We'll make it a team effort.

You know, I think you just want Dubya to get elected to keep him safely out of Texas.

466 posted on 01/29/2004 8:37:09 PM PST by Nanodik (Bush! The next best thing to a real "conservative")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 456 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
The way I see it, you get all of the former and none of that latter around here.

Not sure what you mean? Me personally, or the site in general?

467 posted on 01/29/2004 8:37:12 PM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 455 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Well, I don't know why you were so quick to attack what I said. What I said was far less outrageous than what our founding fathers did during the revolutionary war...
468 posted on 01/29/2004 8:37:20 PM PST by ItisaReligionofPeace (I'm from the government and I'm here to help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 453 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Magnitude matters.

Not in the end it won't. Trust me on this.

469 posted on 01/29/2004 8:37:55 PM PST by Brad’s Gramma (Vote for GW or I'll beat you up with my walker, cane and sundry old lady items.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 457 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
Unless you meant meaning 2. But is Laz showing 'irreverence toward something considered sacred or inviolable'? Did you mean there's something sacred about the current president?

Thanks for the defense, FRiend, but I found that the tagline was distracting more than anything, so I retired it.

470 posted on 01/29/2004 8:38:03 PM PST by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 463 | View Replies]

To: Nanodik
As much as people shake their heads at people here who will not support Bush, many of us in my camp find it equally baffling that so many self-described "conservatives" can look past Bush's faults.

So the answer for you is to join with the socialists and get the real thing elected?

471 posted on 01/29/2004 8:38:17 PM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 458 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz; Common Tator
If I had some assurance he would govern to significantly to the right of his first term, I would be Bush Bot Number One.

CT wrote a great rant a while back explaining the division of the people. How the candidate must attract the centralist to get elected and then finally in the second term is free to govern as they choose. Since I got a new computer, I no longer have that wonderfully written explanation.....CT do you still have it and would you please repost it for our friend Laz and all others who would benefit?

472 posted on 01/29/2004 8:38:39 PM PST by hoosiermama (prayers for all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 428 | View Replies]

To: Brad's Gramma
Not in the end it won't. Trust me on this.

You mean, after death. Fine, I'll leave that matter to the authority in those matters -- G-d.

But in the meantime, on Earth, magnitude matters.

473 posted on 01/29/2004 8:39:30 PM PST by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 469 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Yep, like the idoit who just junked the Patriot Act, or the one Bill O mentioned tonight.. who is letting a killer who kicked a 3 year old to death, now wants her own kids back..or ones who would INSIST on Kyoto accord. We ALL be living in a place like KALI!
474 posted on 01/29/2004 8:39:33 PM PST by GailA (Millington Rally for America after action http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/872519/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom; doodlelady; Jim Robinson
Thanks for the ping to this most excellent thread!
475 posted on 01/29/2004 8:39:53 PM PST by alwaysconservative (Dems: Dim, Disgraceful, Derivative, Deadly, Demented, and Drooling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: ItisaReligionofPeace
You're Constitution party vote, is masturbatory. You call it principled and I'm beginning to realize you're sincere. Most of the CP's here are not. They're Bush haters. You, my new friend, are not at all like them.
476 posted on 01/29/2004 8:40:20 PM PST by onyx (Your secrets are safe with me and all my friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 468 | View Replies]

To: Tempest
Ouch, Tempest! Anyone who knows you at all understood the sarcasm without you spelling it out...

I'll vouch for ya ;-)
477 posted on 01/29/2004 8:40:22 PM PST by Tamzee (W '04..... America may not survive a Democrat at this point in our history....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 380 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
ROFL!!

Wait a minute , are you calling me a bad name?

I demand an apology!!!

478 posted on 01/29/2004 8:40:37 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 394 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
You being ABB I assume you would go for Dean too?

YEAAAAAAAAEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!

At least the front runners are from the Northeast (you know, close to Canada) cause god knows the last two offerings out of Texas (LBJ and Dubya) have been disasters. Guess they just have a surplus of a$$holes there.

479 posted on 01/29/2004 8:40:49 PM PST by Nanodik (Bush! The next best thing to a real "conservative")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 451 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Neets has taken care of that:

Yep, saw it - nice job, Neets, and that's a good start to the the 'he ain't perfect so he's a liberal' list.

480 posted on 01/29/2004 8:41:11 PM PST by Ophiucus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 1,261-1,271 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson