Waving lighter in air
Posted on 01/29/2004 5:54:35 PM PST by Jim Robinson
Will Bush solve the illegal immigration problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the government spending problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the campaign finance problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the drug war problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the nation's education problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the so-called healthcare problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the so-called environmental problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the social security problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush solve the medicare problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.
Will Bush defend America from those bent on destroying her? You'd better bet your sweet bippy he will.
Will any of the Democrats defend America? Hell no they won't. They'd rather turn us over to the U.N. They'd surrender to the French Foreign Legion if given the chance.
Will Bush appoint conservative judges? Yup!
Will Kerry, Edwards, Clark, Hillary, et al, appoint conservative judges? Yeah, right. And hell will freeze over tomorrow.
Will Bush continue reducing taxes? Yup.
Will Kerry, Edwards, Clark, Hillary, et al, raise your taxes as soon as they possibly can if given the opportunity and continue raising them until hell freezes over? Yup.
Will Bush defend the right to life? Check
Will Bush defend marriage between a man a woman? Check
Will Bush defend the right to keep and bear arms? Check
Will Bush say no to Kyoto? Check.
Will Bush say no to a world court? Check.
Will Bush say no to the U.N.? Check.
Will Kerry, Edwards, Clark, Hillary, et al, remove our national sovereignty and subjugate America to world government? Just as quickly as they possibly can if given the opportunity.
Will any other person be elected to the Presidency in 2004 other than Bush (God willing) or a Democrat? Obviously not.
Doesn't make a lick of sense to me to allow the America hating, freedom hating Democrats back into power now that we've kicked them out.
Say yes to sovereignty for America and continued freedom for all Americans.
Say no to the RATS!!
I like it. I like it a lot. I'll mention that when I email BC'04 tomorrow.
just may be that Dubyuh and his advisors are startin' to feel the RightWing's pain...MUD
I hope so. Time will tell. I suppose I have to give him the benefit of the doubt because of who and what the RATS are.
Waving lighter in air
"I like it. I like it a lot. I'll mention that when I email BC'04 tomorrow."
Dumb question, but who's BC'04, my FRiend? FWIW, I'd like to see Federal spending linked to a % of GDP. It would make economic growth a good thing fer BigGuv'ment BigSpenders and curtail spending when the economy lags.
"I suppose I have to give him the benefit of the doubt because of who and what the RATS are."
Trust but verify...Dubyuh's hinted as fiscal discipline in the past, only to propose huge increases in the funding of the Natl. Endowment for the Arts, Education Spending, Farm subsidies, and paid volunteerism!! It's up to those of us on the RightWing to insist upon fiscal discipline or else we'll be relegated to whining about how Bush has allowed BigGuv'mentSpending to get outta control AGAIN!!
FReegards...MUD
Bush-Cheney '04
I signed up so I could more effectively push them back to the right (or atleast try)
I think #2 is more important than #1. By far. However, if we can have both #1 and #2, I'm all for it. But if we're going to get only one, I choose #2.
My point is, having only 1 OR 2 is not enough. So it's not a matter of one being more of less important than the other. A Republican minority that is wonderfully conservative and rails against a Democratic Socialist majority wont save our country. Neither will a RINO slow-slide to socialism. Without both, we are nowhere.
We gave them the House. They said we need the Senate. We gave them the Senate. Then they said we needed the White House. We gave them the White House. Ah, but who is "we" and who is "them". "They" are Republicans. We have a Republican majority, not a conservative majority. And "we" are the voters - not just the conservative base, but the moderates and swing voters who make the majority coalition. We, the conservatives, have to be electing one of OURS. For example, we need to get Pat Toomey to defeat Arlen Specter. about 80-90% of the Republicans in Congress are pretty good conservatives. If we get enough margins in the Senate and House, we can simply ignore the RINOs.
Better minority party status than ... to utterly abandon our conservative and constitutional principles. I cant agree that 'minority party status' is a desirable situation when I know the alternative is power to Kennedy, Daschle, Hillery, Liberals like Boxer, Kerry, Pelosi, etc.
And this budget has broken the camel's back. Bush's new budget has a .5% discretionary domestic increase and proposed spending limits. He's turning the ship of state a bit to the right on this issue, about time.
Dittos and a reminder - what a refreshing change he is from his predecessor, who lied and broke campaign promises on a regular basis!!
It's up to WeThePeople to make sure that Congress doesn't formalize outta-control spending with legislation. I've never been one to shrink from debating Lib'rals on this Forum and one thing I've discovered from such endeavors is that the Left is scair't as hell of instituting over-arching spending limits. What I mean is that whenever I discussed linking Federal spending to a % of Gross Domestic Product, the Lefties would insist I name particular programs that would be reduced and by how much. I'd argue that "NO, priorities would have to be established AFTER we agreed that overall spending needed to be reduced", and that just killed the Lefties' big-spending stance!!
If we can set limits and have automatic accross-the-board reductions in place if Congress fails to institute priorities, I think America will benefit greatly as long as we insist that Congress adheres to the limits.
FReegards...MUD
LOL...thank you, thankyouverymuch!!
FReegards...MUD
'Ceptin' fer sinky and Arnie, yeah....LOL!!
FReegards...MUD
BTW...dwbh was the Lefty troll who made it obvious that overreaching spending limits where the death-knoll fer BigGuv'ment growth!!
Good deal...it pays to know folks with connections!! Please let 'em know that the RightWing wants to enthusiastically support the GOP ticket, but we demand that conservatism--and fiscal discipline--be paramount in our platform!!
FReegards...MUD
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.