VANITY: The best way to keep America a sovereign free nation is to keep the Democrats out of power!

Free Republic

[Jim Robinson]

Will Bush solve the illegal immigration problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.

Will Bush solve the government spending problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.

Will Bush solve the campaign finance problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.

Will Bush solve the drug war problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.

Will Bush solve the nation's education problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.

Will Bush solve the so-called healthcare problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.

Will Bush solve the so-called environmental problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.

Will Bush solve the social security problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.

Will Bush solve the medicare problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.

Will Bush defend America from those bent on destroying her? You'd better bet your sweet bippy he will.

Will any of the Democrats defend America? Hell no they won't. They'd rather turn us over to the U.N. They'd surrender to the French Foreign Legion if given the chance.

Will Bush appoint conservative judges? Yup!

Will Kerry, Edwards, Clark, Hillary, et al, appoint conservative judges? Yeah, right. And hell will freeze over tomorrow.

Will Bush continue reducing taxes? Yup.

Will Kerry, Edwards, Clark, Hillary, et al, raise your taxes as soon as they possibly can if given the opportunity and continue raising them until hell freezes over? Yup.

Will Bush defend the right to life? Check

Will Bush defend marriage between a man a woman? Check

Will Bush defend the right to keep and bear arms? Check

Will Bush say no to Kyoto? Check.

Will Bush say no to a world court? Check.

Will Bush say no to the U.N.? Check.

Will Kerry, Edwards, Clark, Hillary, et al, remove our national sovereignty and subjugate America to world government? Just as quickly as they possibly can if given the opportunity.

Will any other person be elected to the Presidency in 2004 other than Bush (God willing) or a Democrat? Obviously not.

Doesn't make a lick of sense to me to allow the America hating, freedom hating Democrats back into power now that we've kicked them out.

Say yes to sovereignty for America and continued freedom for all Americans.

Say no to the RATS!!

[He Rides A White Horse]

The cat is already out of the bag, mainly because having a class of easy-to-exploit cheap labor is the equivalent of crack cocaine to many U.S. business interests, who in turn funnel money into political war chests and lobbying to maintain the status quo on this issue. While I prefer to stand firmly on principle myself, those who think money -- lots of money -- isn't at the root of this problem have no concept of what the problem really is.

Oh no, I see your point............and I suggest a similar remedy for those who would hire easy-to-exploit cheap [illegal] labor at the expense of America.

The slammer.

[hoosiermama]

Who are you wanting to impeach? Congress? Why don't we just vote them out of office?....OTOH Have you ever tried. B Hill can't win his home town, but he keeps getting elected. Go figure.

[hoosiermama]

We don't have enough jails.....It would be easier to move them all to CA and build a fence. (nothing against CA)

[He Rides A White Horse]

They play fast and loose with the economical structure of America.

They introduce means of unfair competition, any honest person looking for employment has to compete with a worker who will be paid no benefits, lower wages, etc, and nobody is there to object.

.....and they do it all for personal gain, at the expense of America and Americans.

......and anybody considering a challenge based on 'free market economies, you are a socialist"....don't try it. Grab a shovel before you do so.

[hoosiermama]

Take CA back, we may need to build the fence along the Mississippi! It's much more wide spread than you can imagine.
Thanks can go to the CLintons' administration! It's part of their legacy! Bush gets to clean up yet another of the WJCs' messes.

[He Rides A White Horse]

Judges, hoosiermama.............and there are provisions for it. It was always the Constitutional remedy for these 9th Circuit types. They are not invincible...........they are insufferable.

....and they are only as sufferable as we say they are.

[ZULU]

The best way to keep America a Sovereign nation is to KICK the Democrats OUT of America!!

They are evil, lying, stupid traitors.

[hoosiermama]

Couldn't agree more about the need for Conservative judges. Take a look at Bush's appointees! That's why the dems are really scared! They know if these positions and the SCOTUS are filled with conservatives they will lose their hold. SO far the 9th Circus has been over ruled in the Appellate Courts, but what happens if "W" doesn't get those Conservatives appointed? We MUST, regardless of how we feel about other issues stand by him for the judges.
As far as impeaching the judges, it's realistically near to impossible. Been around the law my entire life. Best we can hope for is a well placed earthquake ;^)

[He Rides A White Horse]

Article II, section 4, of the Constitution provides that "[t]he President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors."

Call ignoring the Constitution what you want...........Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Judges are subject to impeachment. This article states that fact plainly.

It is clearly within the realm of legislative authority to hold a hearing or trial on grounds of the above stated situations.

[He Rides A White Horse]

Take a look at Bush's appointees!

It goes well beyond those who are considered appointees..............Congress has the abilty to remove those who are found to be lacking in fulfilling their judicial responsibilities; it's a clear safeguard against those who would legislate from the bench.

[hoosiermama]

Yes they can be help accountable through impeachment but bad judgment and lack of knowledge and poor work ethics can't really be classified under Treason, Bribery or high crimes am not even sure their misdemeanors. Although, I'm sure we'd both like to classify them as such....Getting rid of the liberal do-gooder judges, I'm afraid will just have to evolve over time....I the mean time let's get behind "W" and his conservative judicial appointments! (Expect Estrada to be his first SCOTUS appointment) My eyes are getting heavy....night.

[hoosiermama]

It's not just legislating from the bench....It the entire judicial system, from professors up. They are teaching young lawyers how to "Get around" the laws rather than to study and apply the laws......our legal profession is becoming a group of "loop jumpers" instead of scholars.

Now really must go bond with my pillow..... Nice meeting you.

[He Rides A White Horse]

....and I disagree.

The problem is that the federal judiciary has created an aura of supremacy around themselves, an aura that few are willing to challenge.

Ignoring the Constitution, and refusing to uphold what is the law of the land hardly strikes me as not qualifying for the simple act of a misdemeanor...........but categorize it as you will, it strikes me as something that certainly brings itself under legislative review regardless.

Perhaps it is time that people refuse to accept judicial fiat as the law of the land, and realize that these judges ruling from the bench aren't as all powerful as their egos might tell them.....and there is a great tradition of checks and balances to support that viewpoint.

[He Rides A White Horse]

Now really must go bond with my pillow..... Nice meeting you.

Getting there myself..........please post again.

[He Rides A White Horse]

....and let me also say in parting that their own judicial goons have left incredible latitude as far as interpreting the Constitution.....and what myself and others have proposed isn't all that creative or inventive.

I feel quite good about it actually..............it's Constitutionally sound. It comes nowhere near the tangental thinking that pervades liberal court circuits. It's direct, it's true, and let them explain.

They aren't immune from any misconduct. Let's shatter that myth tonight.

Sleep well, hoosiermama.

[He Rides A White Horse]

Yes they can be help accountable through impeachment but bad judgment and lack of knowledge and poor work ethics can't really be classified under Treason, Bribery or high crimes am not even sure their misdemeanors.

...and let that particular branch of Constitutional usurpers protest when it happens............it will be completely legal, Constitutionally demanded, and right

It will be an honor for those designated by Congress to place them under arrest.

[OrthodoxPresbyterian]

Achieving 8% Economic Growth in One Year while printing 5% Government Bonds which you'll hafta pay off, an extra 5% a year, over the next 30 years. INSANITY!! ~~ By definition. At least when not under wartime conditions. I guess everyone does know it though.

Even the "wartime conditions" example is just an "Argument from Necessity", George.

Admittedly, if the Canadian Hordes ever come rampaging over the Northern Frontiers in an orgy of rapine and pillage, it might be a justifiable necessity to run up the balance on the USA National Credit Card for the necessary Tanks and Bombs to drive the Canuck sons-of-whores into the sea...

But that is a long way from claiming that such Fiscal Profligacy is "economically beneficial".

I remain utterly unconvinced that running up a $500-Billion Dollar Deficit, per year, can ever be considered "economically beneficial" if one truly measures the short-term gain of Inflated Economic Growth against the long-term drain of a few hundred billion Government Bonds which require an additional 5% Debt Service per year, every year, for the next 30 years.

Meanwhile, the Red Chinese are running surpluses on nearly every front, with an aggregate Tax-and-Regulatory Burden which is barely more than half that which the Federal Congress imposes on the USA.

The next half-century in East Asia threatens to be very interesting.

[WOSG]

Dittos on this 100%.

I'll add a few more - QUESTIONS ANTI-BUSH CONSERVATIVES SHOULD ASK:

Will whining about how many Republican elected officials are insufficiently conservative do ANYTHING at all to advance the conservative agenda? Will it, when the Democrats are out there opposing everything conservative 100% and calling even moderate position to be 'not enough'?

Will it help to demand 100% obedience on all issue, when what we need is to make friends with a MAJORITY of voters, most of whom will agree on now more than 70% to 80% of issues?

Will wasting energy tearing up the organization and party that is the one vehicle for conservatives to get into elective office (the GOP) help the cause? NO!

Will walking off the battlefield help us win the fight?

Will quitting a large party that has 2400 seats in Federal and state elective office for parties that have no elected office holders increase or decrease influence? Do quitters win? Do winners quit?

Will tearing down be as effective as building up?

In a time of war - and with our war on terror this *is* a time of war - can a man who called *since 1971* for the UN to decide on war & peace issues be considered fit to be our commander in chief? Can the Democrats - who put partisanship over patriotism - be trusted to preserve our national sovereignty?

[WOSG]

"WTF are you talking about? Have ANY of Bush's nominees been ANYTHING like Ginsburg? It's one of the areas where he has been MOST faithful to his conservatism...and it's why that is where the Rats have obstructed him the most."

Very true.

Ginsburg was an ACLU lawyer. Breyer a Massachusetts liberal judge.

Kerry will appoint kennedy/Dukakis/ACLU/Liberal elitist activist judges ... PERIOD. No doubt.

[WOSG]

"Nations that allow themselves to be over run by immigants cease to exist. There is no more important issue then securing the border and Bush won't do it. End of story, nothing else matters, over run is over run."

It is never the case that "nothing else matters" ... we have failed to enforce immigration laws for decades - the problem didnt start nor end with Bush. (In fact IMHO it started with the 1965 immigration law).