Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Second BBC Exec Resigns Over Iraq Story (BBCBS)
http://abcnews.go.com/wire/World/ap20040129_1740.html ^ | January 29th, 2004 | January 29th, 2004

Posted on 01/29/2004 3:25:58 PM PST by ChadGore



(AP Photo)

Second BBC Exec Resigns Over Iraq Story

Second BBC Executive Resigns, Shaken Broadcaster Apologizes Over Report on Iraq Intelligence

The Associated Press


LONDON Jan. 29 — The chief of the BBC stepped down Thursday as the badly rattled broadcaster struggled to respond to harsh criticism from a judge who repudiated its report that the government "sexed up" intelligence on Iraq.

The resignation of British Broadcasting Corp. director-general Greg Dyke stunned BBC employees, and hundreds of them rallied outside the network's offices around Britain to show their support for him. One local BBC radio station briefly went off the air in protest.

The BBC apologized for errors it made in the story, which was at the center of a furious, monthslong battle with the government.

Dyke resigned after an emergency meeting of the board of governors. Board chairman Gavyn Davies quit Wednesday, hours after the judge, Lord Hutton, announced his findings.

The BBC, whose extensive news and entertainment programming gives it a uniquely powerful place in British life, was shaken by Hutton's assessment Wednesday that its report was "unfounded" and its editorial procedures were "defective."

The senior appeals judge led an inquiry into the suicide in July of David Kelly, a government weapons adviser who was the source of BBC radio correspondent Andrew Gilligan's report that the government exaggerated evidence on Iraqi weapons and included a claim they knew was probably false in a September 2002 dossier summing up intelligence for the public.

Hutton almost completely exonerated the government, saying it had neither mistreated Kelly nor knowingly "sexed up" the dossier and calling the Gilligan report's claims "unfounded."

He said the allegations were "very grave" and faulted BBC editors for failing to review what Gilligan was going to say before he went on the air with the first, and strongest, version of his story.

The reporter broadcast that version without a script, answering an anchor's questions extemporaneously. The BBC later faulted him for "loose use of language."

Richard Ryder, appointed as a temporary replacement for Davies, noted that Hutton had "highlighted serious defects in the corporation's processes and procedures."

"On behalf of the BBC, I have no hesitation in apologizing unreservedly for our errors and to the individuals whose reputations were affected by them," he said, adding that the broadcaster began putting reforms in place before the judge's ruling.

Prime Minister Tony Blair accepted the BBC's apology which he had long demanded and said it was time for all involved in the bitter row to move on.

"This for me has always been a very simple matter of an accusation that was a very serious one that was made," he said. "It has now been withdrawn, that is all I ever wanted."

Ryder said Mark Byford, the deputy director general, would stand in for Dyke until a permanent replacement was chosen. The job, director general and editor-in-chief, includes responsibility for the entire BBC, not just its news divisions.

The BBC has declined to say whether it will take action against Gilligan.

Hundreds of BBC workers left their desks to rally outside the broadcaster's TV Center in London, shouting their support for Dyke and waving signs that said "Bring Back Greg," "You've Been Brilliant," and "Inspired Leadership."

Employees briefly left work to show their support at BBC offices around Britain, and the BBC radio station in Somerset Sound, southwestern England, went off the air for a minute in protest.

"The BBC has already said that they are sorry," said Anne Gilchrist, head of entertainment for the CBBC children's television station, who was rallying outside the TV Center. Dyke "made the organization its most creative. For him to be sacrificed is outrageous."

Dyke said he hoped his departure would allow the broadcaster to move past a difficult period.

"I think my going is very important in preserving the BBC's editorial independence," he said in announcing his resignation. Later, he said he didn't fully accept the judge's criticism.

Others have rejected Hutton's conclusions more explicitly.

"Whitewash?" The Independent newspaper suggested in its main headline. "Justice?" asked the Daily Mail tabloid.

Many had expected the judge who was appointed by Blair to criticize the prime minister and his officials for alleged exaggeration in the dossier and confirming Kelly's name to journalists trying to identify Gilligan's source. The scientist's widow has said he felt betrayed when his Ministry of Defense superiors identified him. He killed himself days after being thrust into the spotlight.

Lord Rees-Mogg, former vice-chairman of the BBC board, said he had no confidence in Hutton's verdict.

"His evidence does not support his conclusions and ... it is, put quite simply, a bad bit of work," he said.


(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bbc; bbcbs; blair; bush; lies
Blair and Bush are RIGHT !
1 posted on 01/29/2004 3:26:01 PM PST by ChadGore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ChadGore
Chad this is already in breaking news....looking down several items in the side bar...
2 posted on 01/29/2004 3:30:02 PM PST by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChadGore
Lots of "loose language?" They should review abcnbccnncbs et al.
3 posted on 01/29/2004 3:30:41 PM PST by Libertina (FReepers make the news...Democrats whine ;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChadGore
Yes. They are good men. And when the truth overcomes, the guilty often react rabidly. It is good to see BBC executives, who themselves probably did not practice deception, but who were ultimately responsible for actions of subordinates, step up to the plate. (How liberals HATE accountabililty and consequence, within their own ranks!) The truth truly hurts those who practice deception.
4 posted on 01/29/2004 3:34:54 PM PST by Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChadGore
The BBC blows and they also need to fire Gilligan.

I could not be happier about the results of the investigation, but the BBC needs to have its funding revoked. It's too antiBush, antiBlair, and antiAmerican.

Soon all those protesting workers will be without a job.

5 posted on 01/29/2004 3:39:40 PM PST by BushisTheMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republic
Re: The truth truly hurts those who practice deception.

That's an amazing line.

6 posted on 01/29/2004 3:47:10 PM PST by ChadGore (Bush 2004 HE'S EARNED IT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ChadGore
bttt
7 posted on 01/29/2004 3:53:20 PM PST by ChadGore (Bush 2004 HE'S EARNED IT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChadGore
Why can't the NY Times follow suit and just resign altogether? I'm sure they could find good jobs over in France!
8 posted on 01/29/2004 3:53:46 PM PST by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: princess leah
Re: Why can't the NY Times follow suit and just resign altogether? I'm sure they could find good jobs over in France!

ROFL so very true. Where are all the retractions from the varried news services who quoted the BBC on this story?

Where's the retraction from the NYT ?

9 posted on 01/29/2004 3:57:07 PM PST by ChadGore (Bush 2004 HE'S EARNED IT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ChadGore
Of course Bush and Blair were right (I know YOU know).

Hutton almost completely exonerated the government, saying it had neither mistreated Kelly nor knowingly "sexed up" the dossier and calling the Gilligan report's claims "unfounded."

Each thread I come across about this story I will point out: Gilligan is still there. Gilligan is a reporter who was in Iraq during the war and filed numerous FALSE stories about our troops, including claiming we were not at the airport when we were.

Until the BBC fires him their apology is worse than worthless.

10 posted on 01/29/2004 3:59:51 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Was Gilligan a part of the BBC newscrew thrown off the British warship during the Iraqi War because they kept exaggerating and falsely promoting news negative to the ongoing war activity and REFUSED to relay positive events?
11 posted on 01/29/2004 4:12:31 PM PST by Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
The Brits need to make the payments to the BBC voluntary to test the real public support.
12 posted on 01/29/2004 4:20:18 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BushisTheMan
The BBC blows and they also need to fire Gilligan.

I respectfully disagree. The false witness of this filthy lying leftist piece of pond scum cost the life of a decent and honorable man.

The BBC should put a loaded revolver on Gilligan's desk and tell him to apologise in person to the man whom he so grievously wronged.

13 posted on 01/29/2004 4:45:35 PM PST by John Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: John Locke
Sorry but I don't believe that Kelly was a decent and honorable man. He lied to the commission and he knew they would soon realize that. When he said he didn't think that was him in that report, he then found out that the other woman reporter had taped his conversation that disputed this fact. He lied and he knew he would be caught.

In addition, Kelly signed a confidentiality agreement and broke it. He is a traitor.

You lie down with dogs (Gilligan et al) and you get fleas. In this case, he got terminal fleas. I have NO sympathy for this man.

His best friend said all this part about knowing he was going to be caught out in a lie and that he ruined his own reputation.

The BBC convinced this man to talk...but Kelly did the talking.
14 posted on 01/30/2004 9:58:29 AM PST by BushisTheMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson