Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IRAQ MINISTER SAYS SADDAM WMD CAREFULLY HIDDEN
Reuters ^ | 1/29/04

Posted on 01/29/2004 6:40:30 AM PST by areafiftyone

(Updates with comments on Saddam's trial, Iraq's unity)

By Anna Mudeva

SOFIA, Jan 29 (Reuters) - Iraq's foreign minister said on Thursday Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction, which inspectors have failed to find, were carefully hidden but Hoshiyar Zebari said he was confident they could be discovered.

"I have every belief that some of these weapons could be found as we move forward," Zebari, an Iraqi Kurd, told a news conference in Sofia. "They have been hidden in certain areas. The system of hiding was very sophisticated."

The United States and Britain cited Iraq's possession of chemical and biological arms as their main reason for invading the country last March and toppling Saddam. But no such weapons have so far come to light despite intensive searches.

Former chief U.S. weapons hunter David Kay said on Wednesday "we were almost all wrong" about the issue and it was "highly unlikely that there were large stockpiles of deployed militarised chemical and biological weapons" in Iraq.

But Zebari, on a visit to Bulgaria, said: "We as Iraqis have seen Saddam Hussein develop, manufacture and use these weapons of mass destruction against us. He hasn't denied that."

Zebari was apparently referring to the use of chemical weapons by Saddam's forces against Iraqi Kurdish villages in the late 1980s.

He reiterated the position of Iraq's U.S.-appointed Governing Council that Saddam, accused of sending thousands of Iraqis to mass graves, should be tried by an Iraqi court.

The former Iraqi president, who was given prisoner of war status, was captured in mid-December near his home town of Tikrit, having evaded U.S. forces since the American military launched its war in Iraq with a March 20 attack targeting him.

Zebari said Saddam's trial should be fair and transparent because it would be a test for Iraq's new rulers to prove their adherence to the supremacy of law.

TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY

Asked to comment on Turkey's fears Iraqi Kurds might seek a breakaway state, Zebari said there were no plans to divide Iraq.

"We have proved over the last nine months that all the Iraqis from the North to the South are committed to the national unity...No group, no party has any plans to undermine Iraq's unity or territorial integrity," he said.

U.S. President George W. Bush said on Wednesday he was also committed to a "territorially intact" Iraq.

Turkish officials have been concerned Iraqi Kurds might press for an independent state, which could boost independence claims by Turkey's own restive Kurdish minority.

The Kurds, who fought with the United States to topple Saddam, are one of Iraq's best organised ethnic groups after enjoying U.S-protected autonomy since the 1991 Gulf War. They have presented a plan to the Iraqi Governing Council that grants significant autonomy to the Kurdish region.

Zebari did not rule out the federalisation of Iraq as long as it did not violate territorial unity and added only the Iraqi people could choose the country's future political system.




TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: hoshiyarzebari; iraq; wmd; zebari
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 321-336 next last
To: Physicist
UNSCOM listed the unaccounted WMD in their 1998 report, and a poster here some days ago detailed the fact that President Bush was simply summarizing that report in his 2002 State of the Union, thus rebutting the "Bush lied and misled" mantra. Those weapons have never been accounted for, plain and simple, and the pattern of cover-up and deception that has occured since '98 with the inspectors (confirmed by Kay), the violations of the numerous Security Council resolutions, is well-know and accepted by the world as fact.

It is the intelligence post 1998 that does appear to be a big issue and I think the administration would do well to get out in front of this now. What's the harm? Even if WMD are discovered, addressing bad intelligence is a win-win.

The debate about what happened to the known WMD, what people thought happened, why Saddam did or didn't do this or that, is most interesting and will likely go on for a long time and result in a number of wealthy book authors.

On the Syria question, I'd be interested in hearing people's ideas on what would be their fundemental motivation for accepting Saddam's WMD immediately pre-war. I think it's safe to say they have their own WMD, which they presumably have been free to "donate" to their terrorist friends around the world. Why expose yourself like that when you have the United States army at your border just waiting for an excuse to kick your ass? Had to be some pretty big $$$'s involved if it happened.
101 posted on 01/29/2004 7:34:35 AM PST by truthchaser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: dogbyte12
I am not a pollyana here. I believed before the war that he had WMDs. The facts now made me change that belief. If you genuinely believe that of the hundreds of people who would be required to work on a WMD program, all of them are either dead, or not motivated by a multimillion dollar payoff, I think you are wrong. It's human nature. Somebody would have squealed by now. Heck, I am sure the CIA is sodium pentatholing some folks. We still have squat. Facts are facts. Wishful thinking usually gets one nowhere.

The sooner we get behind this, take our lumps and move on, the better. Bush can focus on Saddam's capture and the liberation of 26 million people... If he waits until closer to the election, it'll be a slow trickle that just won't go away, and in the end, it could seriously destroy his credibility.

102 posted on 01/29/2004 7:34:59 AM PST by NYC Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeLawyer
Kay's Interim Report to Congress

Here's just a brief excerpt:

What have we found and what have we not found in the first 3 months of our work?

We have discovered dozens of WMD-related program activities and significant amounts of equipment that Iraq concealed from the United Nations during the inspections that began in late 2002. The discovery of these deliberate concealment efforts have come about both through the admissions of Iraqi scientists and officials concerning information they deliberately withheld and through physical evidence of equipment and activities that ISG has discovered that should have been declared to the UN. Let me just give you a few examples of these concealment efforts, some of which I will elaborate on later:

A clandestine network of laboratories and safehouses within the Iraqi Intelligence Service that contained equipment subject to UN monitoring and suitable for continuing CBW research.

A prison laboratory complex, possibly used in human testing of BW agents, that Iraqi officials working to prepare for UN inspections were explicitly ordered not to declare to the UN.

Reference strains of biological organisms concealed in a scientist's home, one of which can be used to produce biological weapons...

Read the entire report. It's fascinating, and really makes many of the "no WMDs" arguments laughable. I did notice one thing I'd forgotten over the months. In his Oct 03 report, Kay said this:

Any actual WMD weapons or material is likely to be small in relation to the total conventional armaments footprint and difficult to near impossible to identify with normal search procedures. It is important to keep in mind that even the bulkiest materials we are searching for, in the quantities we would expect to find, can be concealed in spaces not much larger than a two car garage;

In other words, we do not expect to find any large stockpiles of WMDs. But a few months later it's suddenly a huge issue. LOL

103 posted on 01/29/2004 7:35:09 AM PST by Coop (God bless our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
The Bush administration has let themselves be led around by the nose with this phony issue and it's probably too late to stop it now.

WMD was never the sole reason for taking action, but he keeps allowing the left to define these issues. They should be shouting from the rooftops what David Kay had to say about our action being justified to counter the headlines pointing out that no WMDs have been found.

104 posted on 01/29/2004 7:35:12 AM PST by CaptRon (Pedecaris alive or Raisuli dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeLawyer
We are told again and again that Iraq's WMD programs would have required hundreds of people and big facilities...

Has everyone forgotten the reports of just a few months ago? We have FOUND the facilities and underground laboratories. We have FOUND hundreds of people to interview. We have FOUND documentation of the programs.

Now it's just the STASH we are looking for. The actual SUPPLIES. How has everyone forgotten so quickly? I just don't understand!

105 posted on 01/29/2004 7:35:16 AM PST by wizardoz ("Crikey! I've lost my mojo!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeLawyer
What is your theory(s) of what has become of the chemical and biological weapons we KNOW that Iraq had?
106 posted on 01/29/2004 7:35:48 AM PST by HankReardon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: kegler4
there are numerous people out there who know about them

They could be dead laying in one of those mass graves.
107 posted on 01/29/2004 7:35:56 AM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Dave S
Why don't you ask the one who proposed the theory? You claimed it's BS. Prove it's BS.
108 posted on 01/29/2004 7:36:01 AM PST by Coop (God bless our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: HankReardon
Very dangerous to use WMD's. We are winning this war, the people trained to properly disperse chemical or biological weapons are probably gone.

They are using suicide attacks so why the need for WMD training and protection? Just open the canister and let it rip.

Besides, the low level insurgients that are left would not have been told where the WMD's have been taken, hidden or whatever.

Saddams second in command, the red headed guy, is running the insurgency. If anyone that's not dead or in prison knows dont you think its Aldouri or whatever his name?

109 posted on 01/29/2004 7:36:58 AM PST by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Solson
While he had months and months and years to hide them, where was our intelligence? We should have been able to track em down.

Get out there and show us how it's done, friend!

Or better yet, read Kay's interim report and then retract your post.

110 posted on 01/29/2004 7:36:59 AM PST by Coop (God bless our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: dogbyte12
Again, if, just one person pointed out to where a thimble full of stuff was, I could accept that we might be missing something here.

Didn't they find just about exactly that amount in one scientist's refrigerator back in August or so?

111 posted on 01/29/2004 7:37:15 AM PST by wizardoz ("Crikey! I've lost my mojo!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: NYC Republican; dogbyte12
I agree with all of this.

Read Kay's report. Plenty of WMD personnel have talked.

112 posted on 01/29/2004 7:37:58 AM PST by Coop (God bless our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: kinghorse
Let's keep our eye on the ball ...

Paul Begala was on Don Imus show this morning. Barf. The latest DNC talking points: Democrats do not hate Bush. They do not think it was a war for oil or Halliburton. Bush may have had good intentions, and we all believed Saddam did have WMDs. But Bush "lied". He knew, or should have known, Saddam was no threat.We didn't have to do anything, and now 500 soldiers are dead. For nothing.

Minus the gratuitious swipes, this is more or less equivalent to what I believe the honest anti-war right believes.

When you add up Iraq, I don't see how anyone who believes those points (and isn't just posturing politically) can fail to take into account the justness and strategic value of having accomplished this invasion. The shadowy ins and outs of the WMDs story may become clear in time. Don't hold your breath for the big revelation.

113 posted on 01/29/2004 7:38:05 AM PST by NutCrackerBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: NYC Republican
Oh come now...

All he would have to do is get a bunch of prisoners to construct and/or modify the hiding place. and load it with the WMD. Then execute them.

Then, execute all the scientists and workmen that could possible know their whereabouts.

Or do you suggest Saddam Hussein is above that?

114 posted on 01/29/2004 7:38:22 AM PST by DCPatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Dave S
There is, and wasn't documentation of UN supervised disposal of WMD's in Iraq. If I'm wrong, direct me to the documentary evidence. The WMD's had to have been disposed of or taken/hidden some where.
115 posted on 01/29/2004 7:39:24 AM PST by HankReardon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Coop
even the bulkiest materials we are searching for, in the quantities we would expect to find, can be concealed in spaces not much larger than a two car garage

Thanks for the Kay report excerpts.
116 posted on 01/29/2004 7:39:30 AM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: sphinx
Actually, what the idiots believe is that the UN, Russians, Germans, British, French, and Israelis, as well as Clinton, Gore, Madeleine Albright, Bill Cohen, Tom Daschle, Dick Gephardt, John Kerry, et.al. were honestly confused when they thought Iraq had WMDs, but that Bush knew better and lied. The lefties' faith in Bush's omniscience is touching to behold.

LOL! Good point! They must be on the "evil genius" side of the "evil genius/gibbering idiot" Bush caricature today.

117 posted on 01/29/2004 7:40:08 AM PST by wizardoz ("Crikey! I've lost my mojo!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: HankReardon
They had several tons of 'heavy' water. That's water with an extra hydrogen atom I believe.

If Hitler hadn't been such a racist, refusing to believe in Einsteins "Jewish Mathematics" he may very well have developed 'the bomb' and the world would be a very different place today.

L

118 posted on 01/29/2004 7:41:17 AM PST by Lurker (Don't p*** down my back and try to tell me it's raining.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Atlantic Friend
"But I wonder, when you're desperate and your capital is about to fall to the Coalition forces, does it stops you from trying ? The purpose of WMD is to make people think twice about attacking you, and if it fails then it's to make them regret they did."

You would think that that was what an air force was for too, wouldn't you? Yet during Gulf War I, Saddam sent it to Iran rather than risk using it. He wanted to preserve it for future use, knowing that Bush I was kind and gentle and considered him just another point of light and would not hurt him. He miscalculated with Bush II.
119 posted on 01/29/2004 7:42:14 AM PST by Tricorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: dogbyte12
The Nazi scientists told Hitler that they were working on the A-bomb, but they were deliberately doing no such thing.

Sorry, but that's just wrong. That was Heisenberg's cover story after the fact, but he was lying, as the Farm Hall transcripts amply show.

The Nazi bomb scientists were working very seriously to produce such weapons for Hitler (or at least, to lay the groundwork for such weapons). Their enterprise was doomed to failure, however, because the scale of the operation was fell far short of what was needed, and because Heisenberg had made some key physics errors which made their approach unworkable.

120 posted on 01/29/2004 7:42:16 AM PST by Physicist (Sophie Rhiannon Sterner, born 1/19/2004: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1061267/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 321-336 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson