Skip to comments.
BUDGET INCREASE FOR THE NATIONAL ENDOWMENT OF THE ARTS
The Drudge Report ^
| 01-28-2004
| Matt Drudge
Posted on 01/28/2004 6:18:24 PM PST by Captain Peter Blood
BUSH TO SEEK BIG BUDGET INCREASE FOR NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE ARTS... Laura Bush plans to announce the request -- for the largest increase in two decades -- on Thursday... Developing...
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: arts; artsfunding; budgetbuster; bush; federalspending; laurabush; nea; taxdollarsatwork; youpayforthis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 761-780, 781-800, 801-820 ... 1,201-1,203 next last
To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
Some are gleefully looking forward to it. Conservatives ? No, they are NOT!
To: Howlin
Like to scare me huh?
782
posted on
01/28/2004 9:52:16 PM PST
by
Mo1
(Join the dollar a day crowd now!)
To: Mulder
There simply wasn't much enthusiasm for either candidate, and I expect it will be the same in 2004. When I voted in 2000 I voted against Clinton/Gore..this time I will vote for President Bush with much enthusiasm!!
My husband always leans to the left because he has a union job and normally votes third party....not this year! President Bush for him. My youngest daughter has very liberal ideals (okay, she has a conservative upbringing) and she loves Bush.
783
posted on
01/28/2004 9:52:36 PM PST
by
Krodg
To: The Old Hoosier
You know some one already pointed out that agencies like the NEA and NPR employ the wives and girl friends of the Washington elite. So all W is doing is scratching the back of a few "good ole boys" giving the gals something to do. But he sure pick the wrong agency. Conservative hate, loath the NEA. The NEA is a symbol everything conservative find wrong with government. To increase funding is bad, to do it in a major way, with a press conference is like telling conservative to go pound sand. And this conservative got the message loud and clear.
784
posted on
01/28/2004 9:52:45 PM PST
by
jpsb
(Nonminated 1994 "Worst writer on the net")
To: GeronL
What's your problem? R-Deficits are OK now. Didn't you get the memo?
785
posted on
01/28/2004 9:52:51 PM PST
by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(Any day you wake up is a good day.)
To: Sabertooth
My post 759 kind of explains why this is setting me off I think.
786
posted on
01/28/2004 9:52:52 PM PST
by
rwfromkansas
("Men stumble over the truth, but most pick themselves up as if nothing had happened." Churchill)
To: Howlin
You may be a "I will never vote for Bush again" freeper if you have ever said
I will never vote for Bush again if
He doesn't nuke China to get that damn plane back
I will never vote for Bush again if he signs that Stem Cell bill
I will never vote for Bush again if he doesn't stand up against Kyoto
I will never vote for Bush again if he caves to the UN over ANYTHING
I will never vote foe Bush again if he doesn't have Clinton in chains by the end of his first term
I will never vote for Bush again if he does not stand up for gun rights
I will never vote for Bush again if he doesn't end affirmative action
I will never vote for Bush again if he does not get on with attacking Afghanistan
I will never vote for Bush again if he signs CFR
I will never vote for Bush again because his tax cuts are too small and not immediate
I will never vote for Bush again if he doesnt stop the ICC.
To: Sabertooth
Caught me .. guilty as charged :0)
Hello South Philadelphia !!
788
posted on
01/28/2004 9:53:27 PM PST
by
Mo1
(Join the dollar a day crowd now!)
To: Sabertooth
I'm just not sure if this would make my top five or ten things this President has done that I like least. From a policy perspective, no, it isn't the worst thing. It's the absolute arrogance, though, that separates this proposal from all the others. It's like he's rubbing it in. "F- you, I don't need your vote."
As you have noted, I think a lot of people here have just had it, and it isn't just the regular malcontents, either.
To: gatorbait
You sort of left out 1996,1998 and 2000. Oops, stepped into your ranthole again.. You're making my point.
The 'radical right wing' House Republicans were for the most part re-elected in 1996. And 1998. And 2000. And 2002.
All this despite the criticisms and predictions to the contrary by the media and the country club Republicans.
Meanwhile, the moderate GOP Senate lost seats (I believe) in 1996, and 1998. Then they lost even more in 2000 to become a minority party.
And let's not forget Bob "It's my turn" Dole absymal performance in the 1996 elections. What percentage did he get? Something like 37%?
OR maybe it was 42%. I could be getting him confused with that other worthless statist, GHW Bush the first.
790
posted on
01/28/2004 9:54:07 PM PST
by
Mulder
(Fight the future)
To: victoryovertheleft
maybe it's time to come to grips that bushtheyounger has out lefted the left
791
posted on
01/28/2004 9:54:59 PM PST
by
IRtorqued
(may garlic fill the mosques)
To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
It must have been blocked by the bulk mail filter
792
posted on
01/28/2004 9:55:04 PM PST
by
GeronL
(www.ArmorforCongress.com ............... Support a FReeper for Congress)
To: Howlin
Oh gee........................
Okay, I'm convinced. GO KERRY GO! HURRAH FOR HILLARY! BILL CLINTON WAS THE BEST PRESIDENT IN THE HISTSORY OF THE WORLD! NOT
To: Krodg
My husband always leans to the left because he has a union job and normally votes third party....not this year! President Bush for himMy youngest daughter has very liberal ideals.... and she loves Bush.
Of course. Bush is a big-gov't statist, which is why so many real Republicans are upset.
794
posted on
01/28/2004 9:55:44 PM PST
by
Mulder
(Fight the future)
To: Sabertooth
Where on that list is the "dump Bush" Gaggle?
To: The Old Hoosier
Well, I will still vote for him. But, I won't be writing an enthusiastic endorsement in the Sterling College Stir anymore or go around trying to get college students registered to vote for Dubya.
Instead, I will write an attack on him in the newspaper and hold my nose in November.
The only thing that could get me enthusiastic about him is JUDGES or proposing the FairTax and pushing for it.
796
posted on
01/28/2004 9:55:52 PM PST
by
rwfromkansas
("Men stumble over the truth, but most pick themselves up as if nothing had happened." Churchill)
To: rwfromkansas
Instead, I will write an attack on him in the newspaper and hold my nose in November. ? Over this?
To: FreeReign
Forget large Presciption Drugs, Medicare and Social Security spending increases. It's time to jump ship because this puny NEA spending is going back to spending levels that are... ah, ah, still no where's near 1995 levels. Isn't it amazing.
Deck chairs... Titanic... what am I missing? Ah, my top hat and tails! Has anyone seen my cuff links?
|
798
posted on
01/28/2004 9:56:53 PM PST
by
Sabertooth
(Malcontent for Bush - 2004!)
To: Capitalism2003
The medicare plan I support; it starts the path toward privatization.
799
posted on
01/28/2004 9:57:12 PM PST
by
rwfromkansas
("Men stumble over the truth, but most pick themselves up as if nothing had happened." Churchill)
To: rwfromkansas
I won't be writing an enthusiastic endorsement in the Sterling College Stir anymore or go around trying to get college students registered to vote for Dubya. Instead, I will write an attack on him in the newspaper and hold my nose in November. I feel your pain. I really wish I could enthusiastically support someone, but Bush is making it impossible.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 761-780, 781-800, 801-820 ... 1,201-1,203 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson