Skip to comments.
BUDGET INCREASE FOR THE NATIONAL ENDOWMENT OF THE ARTS
The Drudge Report ^
| 01-28-2004
| Matt Drudge
Posted on 01/28/2004 6:18:24 PM PST by Captain Peter Blood
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 1,201-1,203 next last
To: victoryovertheleft
Therefore, anyone who votes against President Bush this fall has on their hands the blood of all those Americans who die thereafter Are you a person?? Do you a mind?? You can not seriously blame terrorist attacks on everyone who voted against your candidates.... are you Wes Clark??
161
posted on
01/28/2004 6:56:12 PM PST
by
GeronL
(Two kinds of people in this country: Makers and Takers........ which are you?)
To: jgrubbs
Excellent!
162
posted on
01/28/2004 6:56:15 PM PST
by
tubavil
To: Scenic Sounds
Thats not the point. The point is that Bush is even considering increasing funding at all.
Remember the old saying, a million here, a million there and pretty soon your talking real money.
It all adds up. I don't care what the budget is for National Endowment, any increase is too much for me.
Comment #164 Removed by Moderator
To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
The Federal Government spent hundreds of millions on propaganda during World War 2.
165
posted on
01/28/2004 6:56:40 PM PST
by
victoryovertheleft
(In politics, those who demand all or nothing typically get nothing.)
To: William McKinley
and when the AWB is renewed, it will be called a brilliant move to preempt the left from passing something more drastic. and supporting CFR was a brilliant tactic, too. Just wait for the dividends of the it's-not-amnesty amnesty.
166
posted on
01/28/2004 6:56:52 PM PST
by
glock rocks
(Badges? We don't need no steenkin badges...)
To: yonif
Thanks. I was just looking it up myself. It looks like it's gonna be just under 130 million for 2004.
A mere drop in the bucket!! ;-)
167
posted on
01/28/2004 6:57:09 PM PST
by
Scenic Sounds
(Sí, estamos libres sonreír otra vez - ahora y siempre.)
To: William Creel; Ricardo4CP; The_Eaglet
If this is true, I have lost all faith in Bush. I'll probably end up voting for whoever the Constitution party nominates.Michael Peroutka is currently the party's designated "provisional" Presidential candidate for 2004. Party founder and three-time Presidential nominee Howard Phillips has already endorsed Peroutka for the nomination.
168
posted on
01/28/2004 6:57:20 PM PST
by
jgrubbs
To: GeronL
Any vote cast for someone other than George Walker Bush next November is a vote for more Americans to die in terrorist attacks. Therefore, anyone who casts such a vote is, to some extent, morally culpable.
169
posted on
01/28/2004 6:57:36 PM PST
by
victoryovertheleft
(In politics, those who demand all or nothing typically get nothing.)
Comment #170 Removed by Moderator
To: victoryovertheleft
Ok - at least you're not a complete lost cause...
171
posted on
01/28/2004 6:58:09 PM PST
by
Pubbie
(We would have the WMDs if Powell and Rice hadn't made a 6 month UN detour)
To: victoryovertheleft
Therefore, anyone who votes against President Bush this fall has on their hands the blood of all those Americans who die thereafter- because they could have voted for the one man in the race who could win and kill the terrorists, but did not as a result of their own stupidity. You go too far, sir. If the Drudge blurb is true and if Bush increases the NEA's funding, then he should and will answer for it. There is NO excuse for spending and wasting federal money like this. To claim that posters here "have blood on their hands" because they oppose such a profligate waste of taxpayer dollars is a despicable thing to say.
172
posted on
01/28/2004 6:58:12 PM PST
by
Johnny_Cipher
(Miserable failure = http://www.michaelmoore.com/ sounds good to me!)
To: victoryovertheleft
I'm not opposed to 'government' I'm opposed to left-wing governmentYou are not a conservative, you a rightist statist
just admit it, you are a Statist
173
posted on
01/28/2004 6:58:12 PM PST
by
GeronL
(Two kinds of people in this country: Makers and Takers........ which are you?)
To: Captain Peter Blood; Tumbleweed_Connection; Sci Fi Guy; x; Reagan Man; Heartbreak of Psoriasis; ...
BUSH TO SEEK BIG BUDGET INCREASE FOR NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE ARTS!
CONSERVATIVE - MODERATE - LIBERAL - CINO - RINO - PING!
174
posted on
01/28/2004 6:58:30 PM PST
by
Happy2BMe
(U.S. borders - Controlled by CORRUPT Politicians and Slave-Labor Employers)
To: victoryovertheleft
I am unhappy about this however - if he reduces it or tries to eliminate it, he hands a weapon to the liberals to attack him. It costs the taxpayer more money, however the RATS won't object, and they can't attack. They have to do it with some other issue. Now however, if they keep up the rabid attacks about the "daficit" President Bush can always propose cutting things like the National Endowment of the Arts, and a few other sacred cows.
175
posted on
01/28/2004 6:58:50 PM PST
by
Enterprise
("You sit down. You had your say. Now I'm going to have my say.")
To: FreedomCalls
What does his impeachment have to do with the implementation
of Dick Morris' triangulation strategy?
Co-opting GOP issues (welfare reform, for example) helped
him win elections.
To: Johnny_Cipher
I never said people opposing it were culpable- people voting against Bush because of it, however, have a moral responsibiliy for every American who dies thereafter in a terrorist attack.
177
posted on
01/28/2004 6:59:12 PM PST
by
victoryovertheleft
(In politics, those who demand all or nothing typically get nothing.)
To: glock rocks
CFR was stupid. Stunningly stupid.
I am ambivalent on the AWB. It doesn't strike me as important in either way (and yes, I know that is a sacrelege to some but so be it) and in most other ways Bush has been excellent on guns.
To: MamaLucci
It's called "triangulation". Worked like a charm for Clinton. ME no like...bad JUJU.
179
posted on
01/28/2004 6:59:26 PM PST
by
mylife
To: victoryovertheleft
Look, we've got to win the bloody election before anything else can be done. Can't you see that?Bush won the "bloody" election in 2000 and has worked to increase the size and spending of the federal government to a size larger than any conservative could ever imagine. He has done a great job of making the idea of "limited government" nothing more than an idea.
180
posted on
01/28/2004 6:59:48 PM PST
by
jgrubbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 1,201-1,203 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson