To: victoryovertheleft
Therefore, anyone who votes against President Bush this fall has on their hands the blood of all those Americans who die thereafter- because they could have voted for the one man in the race who could win and kill the terrorists, but did not as a result of their own stupidity. You go too far, sir. If the Drudge blurb is true and if Bush increases the NEA's funding, then he should and will answer for it. There is NO excuse for spending and wasting federal money like this. To claim that posters here "have blood on their hands" because they oppose such a profligate waste of taxpayer dollars is a despicable thing to say.
172 posted on
01/28/2004 6:58:12 PM PST by
Johnny_Cipher
(Miserable failure = http://www.michaelmoore.com/ sounds good to me!)
To: Johnny_Cipher
I never said people opposing it were culpable- people voting against Bush because of it, however, have a moral responsibiliy for every American who dies thereafter in a terrorist attack.
177 posted on
01/28/2004 6:59:12 PM PST by
victoryovertheleft
(In politics, those who demand all or nothing typically get nothing.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson