1 posted on
01/27/2004 9:11:47 PM PST by
Pokey78
To: Pokey78
Geez. The Rat tricksters for Clinton/Gore couldn't find anything to this story. Now Kerry's people will try to "uncover" the truth. Yeah right.
More Demlib desperation!
2 posted on
01/27/2004 9:21:23 PM PST by
Reagan Man
(The choice is clear. Reelect BUSH-CHENEY in 2004)
To: Pokey78
If we are reading it now, it has already been done.
Clark was a fool for getting anywhere near Moore. Moore is a documented liar who will say anything to make his Marxist beliefs look correct in his own eyes.
Clark might as well have kissed Brezhnev
To: Pokey78
To the campaign of wesley clark: Well, sure, concentrate on GWB while kerry is kicking your behind, why don't you? What the hell does it even matter since you don't stand a chance in hell to win the nomination at this point anyway? Might as well smear the sitting president and leave the one who is kicking your arse alone. Dimbulb is what you are with an even bigger dimbulb consulting you (clintoon).
To: Pokey78
I not sure Kerry wants to politically relive his war years.
7 posted on
01/27/2004 9:30:14 PM PST by
Mike Darancette
(Proud member - Neoconservative Power Vortex)
To: Pokey78
The funniest part of the entire National Guard thing and "Bush using his family name" is that Gearge H.W.Bush was a newly elected (if elected at the time)Republican in a city and state that was controlled by Democrats.
I was there! You would think that in the late '60's GHWB was POTUS the way these people carry on.
9 posted on
01/27/2004 9:36:19 PM PST by
lonestar
(Don't mess with Texas)
To: Pokey78
To: Pokey78
Clark is done. Stick a fork in him and throw him away - his kind ain't worth throwin' to the dogs.
11 posted on
01/27/2004 9:39:35 PM PST by
txzman
(Jer 23:29)
To: Pokey78
Could Clark be a bigger Joke than he is?? I mean his camp just is amatuer hour. I can picture the scene... Two geniouses sitting around a bottle of Bourbon thinking what a novel idea it would be to "hire a private investigator"...
Good Lord man what are these people thinking. That private invesitigators haven't been hired before??
12 posted on
01/27/2004 9:39:45 PM PST by
Hootch
(In awe of Badrays dedication and venture into the belly of the beast!!!)
To: Pokey78
I heard an interesting profile on Clark by a radio station DJ in Los Angeles. The DJ thought he was building Clark up, but by the time I'd heard half of it, I realized Clark is our worst nightmare.
Born and raised in Arkansas...
A forty plus year associate of Bill Clinton...
A Rhodes Schollar for two years...
Bill Clinton and he were there together...
When he left the military he took a position at Steven's Inc...
I don't remember it all, but this was enough for me. This guy should be kept as far as possible away from public office. I suspect he's going to fare far better than I would have guessed if he has the same clowns behind him that Clinton had behind him.
To: Pokey78
Oh for heavens' sake .. THE NEW YORK TIMES DID A STORY ON BUSH'S MILITARY SERVICE AND TOTALLY DEBUNKED THE WHOLE THING. Bush took a leave to help with the election, and returned to complete his service obligation. Bush did not "desert" the military. Anybody who says he did IS A BIG FAT LIAR AND A TOTAL IDIOT WHO CANNOT EVEN READ THE NYT.
These people are so enraged with hatred for Bush they will try to smear him any way possible.
18 posted on
01/27/2004 10:01:19 PM PST by
CyberAnt
("America is the GREATEST NATION on the face of the earth")
To: Pokey78
We have former Clinton staffers on board who say there's nothing to this," says a Kerry staffer, "but we know it's going to come up again and since nobody has a clear sense of the story right now we have to at least look into it."
This Kerry staffer better "put some ice' on this idea. Alot of ghosts from his Vietnam protesting days might come out to haunt him.
19 posted on
01/27/2004 10:07:32 PM PST by
The South Texan
(The Democrat Party and the leftist (ABCCBSNBCCNN NYLATIMES)media are a criminal enterprise!)
To: Pokey78
Isn't one definition of insanity "Doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results"?
To: Pokey78
Check Newsmax. They have a good article about W's National Guard record. Their was no evidence of any desertion or AWOL, the NYT could not find any. We all know the NYT was a bunch of Gore boot-lickers and a**-kissers during the last election.
21 posted on
01/27/2004 10:11:21 PM PST by
punster
To: Pokey78
A waste of waning campaign money. Clark is probably getting very low on money about now and the after tonight he certainly won't be raising a lot now or in the future. If he counting on the internet I think he can forget it.
What monies that are coming in will be going to the Kerry and Dean camps.
I would say after next week it's goodbye to Clark, Edwards and Dennis K.
To: Pokey78
This kind of sh** is like playing catch with nitroglycerin. People are tired of this stuff. Go ahead Weasely, dig away and watch it blow up in your face.
To: Pokey78
At least one other campaign is said to be considering sending opposition researchers down south to look into Bush's record.It sure is amazing the lengths that a political party will go to try and defame the maker of an agenda that is popular, when they can't come up with one single agenda themselves, that is popular, unless it parallels the same agenda.
34 posted on
01/28/2004 12:41:59 AM PST by
EGPWS
To: Pokey78; All
Debunkers:
...in the months before the 2000 presidential election, the New York Times pretty much demolished this Democratic Party urban legend...
35 posted on
01/28/2004 1:01:27 AM PST by
backhoe
(--30--)
To: Pokey78
There needs to be some serious research into finding Clark's brain.
37 posted on
01/28/2004 1:13:58 AM PST by
Fledermaus
(Democrats are just not capable of defending our nation's security. It's that simple!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson