Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If Needed, Who gets to Push the Nuclear Button
me ^ | 1/26/04 | eastforker

Posted on 01/26/2004 1:59:45 PM PST by eastforker

I asked this question on an earlier thread. I was Freepmailed and told it was classified by a naval officer. In light of some of the presidential candidates before us, I would like to know, who decides to push the N button if needed. In contrast, if the N button needs to be pushed and the president refuses, who or what over rules.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: football; thebomb
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121 next last
To: r9etb
As an aside, I wonder how many of the missiles would actually work.
61 posted on 01/26/2004 2:35:02 PM PST by jerseygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Squawk 8888
"The phone could ring now, from NATO headquarters!"
62 posted on 01/26/2004 2:35:10 PM PST by alnitak ("That kid's about as sharp as a pound of wet liver" - Foghorn Leghorn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
Uh, I think you need to rethink this. I, for one, have no doubt for a second that Weasley Clark and Hitlery would push the button...and nuke GOP-controlled states.

You seem to think that the various folks who actually do the shooting will simply say "okey-dokey."

63 posted on 01/26/2004 2:35:22 PM PST by Poohbah ("Beware the fury of a patient man" -- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Lockbar

64 posted on 01/26/2004 2:36:35 PM PST by evets (Zot me baby!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
That's interesting -- I thought all of the members of the President's cabinet are included in the line of succession. I'm no big fan of Tom Ridge, but if Norman Mineta is included in the line of presidential succession, then heck -- I should be, too.
65 posted on 01/26/2004 2:38:15 PM PST by Alberta's Child (Alberta -- the TRUE North strong and free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child; Alamo-Girl
Based on loosely-connected information that I've put together from a number of different sources, I've concluded that Bill Clinton was effectively relieved of his duties as "commander in chief" sometime in his second term of office. If he had given the orders to launch any kind of nuclear strike, perhaps a giant cake would have been rolled into the room and a stripper would have jumped out of it -- but that's about it.

LOL! Unfortunately, not true. The Xlinton's had already surrounded themselves with a number of sycophants in the Pentagon...like Weasely Clark for instance.

66 posted on 01/26/2004 2:38:17 PM PST by Paul Ross ("A country that cannot control its borders isn't really a country any more."-President Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
OK, you say a mad man could never be elected, you mentioned Deen, that is not my guess.Nor do I think GW would, but a power hungry individual who has had a taste of power might.Still the question still stands, who or what body decides when to say "go" or block it. There has to be some check and ballance
67 posted on 01/26/2004 2:38:45 PM PST by eastforker (The color of justice is green,just ask Johny Cochran!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
It's unlikely that we'll ever have a "madman" in office as President.

See my Post #30. That's exactly what we had from January of 1993 to January of 2001.

68 posted on 01/26/2004 2:39:55 PM PST by Alberta's Child (Alberta -- the TRUE North strong and free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: jerseygirl
As an aside, I wonder how many of the missiles would actually work.

We conduct occasional "test launches" at Vandenberg.

Prior to launch, the missile undergoes a much more thorough checkout, with a great deal of repair work, than it would get before a combat launch.

Our failure rate for these launches is about 1 in 5.

69 posted on 01/26/2004 2:40:32 PM PST by Poohbah ("Beware the fury of a patient man" -- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: All
Man, there's a lot of b*!^$£%t being written on this thread. Those of us in the know know that the ONLY "person" authorised to launch the US nukes is a giant computer called WOPR. Or is it "Skynet". I get confused so easily these days...
70 posted on 01/26/2004 2:41:44 PM PST by alnitak ("That kid's about as sharp as a pound of wet liver" - Foghorn Leghorn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: eastforker
I have asked this question of officers I work with in the Air Force and Navy. It is my understanding that the physical act of "pushing a button", or turning a key, is done by those in control of the weapons platforms themselves, the submarine or missile base or aircraft from which the weapons are released. But those individuals are acting under orders which have been given (or activated) by those with proper release authority, in the chain of command.

BTW, one of the missile silo guys told me it was in their training that the most likely launch scenario was not one wherein the speakers suddenly blare out a warning to get ready to launch, like you see dramatized in Hollywood depictions of such an event, but one wherein the crews are constantly receiving information and updates related to a gradually escalating situation, which might or might not lead to a launch order.

71 posted on 01/26/2004 2:43:02 PM PST by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eastforker; r9etb
There is not a high turnover among missile launch officers. Their tours are long and boring but they stand ready to perform if needed.

It takes two launch votes to launch ICBMs from silos. Even if both crew members go wacko and turn their keys, that's only one launch vote. Two other crewmembers must also turn their keys within a specified time. Either at the squadron operations center, the group control center or in the airborne launch control center (Code Name: Looking Glass). The "Glass" was the only location where both launch votes can be entered from the same physical location. In the glory days of SAC, a Glass with a general officer was airborne 24/7/365.

72 posted on 01/26/2004 2:44:13 PM PST by CholeraJoe (I'm a Veteran. I live in Montana. I own assault weapons. I vote. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Thank you. One in five isn't too bad. (I'm assuming the ones that fail wouldn't explode in the silo or whatever)
73 posted on 01/26/2004 2:44:41 PM PST by jerseygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: eastforker
are the minute man silos still maned??
74 posted on 01/26/2004 2:45:36 PM PST by camas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross; Alberta's Child
Thank you for the ping! I would not be surprised if some measures were not taken with regard to Clinton after he "forgot" the football in one instance.

Associated Press 4/24/99 "...President Clinton departed the NATO summit in such haste Saturday that he left behind perhaps the most important piece of luggage in the world - the ``nuclear football.'' The president's military aide, who constantly shadows Clinton and carries the briefcase containing U.S. nuclear launch codes, was mistakenly left at the International Trade Center when Clinton's motorcade sped off 45 minutes early and without notice. The aide walked the 4 1/2 blocks back to the White House without incident..."


75 posted on 01/26/2004 2:46:51 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: eastforker

76 posted on 01/26/2004 2:48:05 PM PST by non-anonymous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eastforker
Maybe we should ask Nancy Pelosi...she's the one who thinks the United States is a big missile...
77 posted on 01/26/2004 2:48:08 PM PST by Dog Anchor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jerseygirl
Thank you. One in five isn't too bad. (I'm assuming the ones that fail wouldn't explode in the silo or whatever)

Ahem...that's 1 failure in 5 attempts, in a carefully-planned test.

The real-world failure rate would be much higher.

78 posted on 01/26/2004 2:48:26 PM PST by Poohbah ("Beware the fury of a patient man" -- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross
Weasely Clark, who was eventually fired? You know you're a real bottom-feeder when you get fired by Bill Clinton, of all people.
79 posted on 01/26/2004 2:49:44 PM PST by Alberta's Child (Alberta -- the TRUE North strong and free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: eastforker
turnover may have more to do with duty in North Dakota....rural North Dakota
80 posted on 01/26/2004 2:50:12 PM PST by Wisconsin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson