Posted on 01/26/2004 6:26:06 AM PST by truthandlife
Recently, our friend Robert Knight chastised another friend David Horowitz for writing an article contending that Christian theology doesn’t classify homosexuality as a sin. Knight pointed out that both the Old and the New Testament treat homosexuality as a sin, and that it was bigotry for Mr. Horowitz to be lecturing Christians on their theology. David may not have considered the implications, but he reacted with a more strenuous broadside demeaning Christian theology.
Another kibitzer in the Los Angeles Times Book Review insisted that Christians remove all references to Jews in the New Testament. In a USA Today Op Ed, Rabbi Gerald Zelizer complained that Christian leaders "are too facile in generalizing their criticism about Hollywood’s portrayal of God and faith" after taking Christian comments out of context and denigrating Christian theology. He then prescribes what Christians should believe.
Surely this contributing writer would be upset if Christians started criticizing Talmudic theology. Furthermore, it’s hard to believe that he would take statements by renowned Christians out of context, and then criticize them on theological grounds that he does not understand since he is not a Christian. The Bible clear that "the natural person does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him, and he is not able to understand them because they are spiritually discerned." (1 Corinthians 2:14) The matters that Rabbi Zelizer is talking about concern a movie made by Christians treating issues from a redemptive perspective.
Shortly thereafter, the Los Angeles Times ran an opinion piece by two people from the Simon Wiesenthal Center, a worthy Jewish organization dedicated to helping people remember the evil slaughter of millions of Jews in the Holocaust in World War II. The men cautioned Mel Gibson about the possible depiction of Jewish leaders in his new movie about the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, The Passion of The Christ.
Apparently, these men get very upset, as we have and they should, whenever someone tries to revise the holocaust history by questioning minor historical details about Hitler’s horrible genocidal program. Then, they contradict themselves by wanting to revise the historical record by hiding the truth about the religious leaders who were involved in the trials that resulted in the death of Jesus. As these men say, it was Pontius Pilate who ordered the crucifixion, but they leave out the fact that it was religious leaders who incited the mob into demanding the crucifixion.
Telling Christians what to think about their own faith has become the fashion in the media, but that does not make it right. It is a base form of religious bigotry and exposes the agenda of the bigots who want to eliminate Jesus, the Bible and Bible-believing Christians from the marketplace of ideas.
The persecution represented by the crucifixion of Jesus Christ led to brutal persecutions of the apostles and thousands of Christians throughout the Middle East and in Rome. Only the peaceful martyrdoms and loving actions of Christ’s followers stemmed this bloody tide of terror. Regrettably, the persecution of Christians was renewed in the 20th Century, which saw more than 100 million Christians persecuted and martyred in Africa, Asia and even Europe. Today this persecution continues unabated in the Sudan, Southeast Asia and the Middle East.
Now in the United States, some intolerant people are effectively calling for the exclusion of all things Christian from public discourse. These revisionists want to remove all the voluminous historical evidence about Jesus from schools, government, and the mass media. For these intolerant people, all speech is acceptable, except references to Jesus Christ and the Bible, which they have forbidden in their politically correct purge of all public discourse. In their attempt to revise history and erase the historical record, they are effectively crucifying Jesus Christ once more, though subtly than those who incited the mob before Pilate to yell, "Crucify Him!" To which Pilate replied that Jesus’ crucifixion was upon their heads (see Matthew 27:15-25).
If we fail to remember this history, we will be doomed to repeat it. Don’t let the kibitzers take away your freedom to think about God in a historically accurate way. If they can let Martin Scorsese defame the real Jesus by producing The Last Temptation of Christ in the name of the First Amendment, surely they can let Mel Gibson release the kind of movie about Jesus he wants to make.
He was struck by lighten during the shooting of the film.
It will be replayed today some time today.
Gibson's 'Christ' Details Crucifixion Scenes, Reveals Conversions
Jesus was part of a splinter group. Look what they did to him!
Why is Scorsese OK but Mel Gibson is not? Why was The Gospel of John not greeted with a preemptive campaign of antisemitism charges like they did with The Passion?
The post-modern theologians and faithless, liberal Catholic bishops have two Jesus'. The Jesus of the Bible and the historical Jesus. The Jesus of the Bible is merely a character in text which they ignore at will because they claim it was written a 100 or even hundreds of years after Jesus. (The actual record of manuscripts point to the earliest dates as the true time of authorship of the Gospels, not the later dates. The disclaimer before the movie The Gospel of John takes this approach of erroneously claiming a very late date of authorship.) The historical Jesus is the Jesus of the DaVinci Code or the Jesus portrayed in The Last Temptation. There is no evidence at all for this Jesus but theologians put more stock in this one than in the Jesus of the Bible because it fits with their program of denigrating Jesus.
Either approach is an attempt to destroy Jesus as Messiah.
Yes even the Jesus of the Bible (or more precisely the Jesus of the post-modern Text) is an attempt to blunt the effect of the Gospel message. That is why after the reading the Gospel in a Catholic Mass the reader is prohibited from saying 'the proclaimation of the Gospel.' Instead they must say 'the Gospel of...' The Gospel is not the proclaimation of a text or an edifying story but the record of the Messiah on Earth.
Mel Gibsons' Jesus is not the Jesus of a distant text but Jesus unambiguously shown as Savior. That is why so many people must hate this movie.
Buy tickets in advance as soon as they are available at the theater. Large advanced sales will mean even more screens will open with The Passion.
Bingo!
What then? Are we Jews monotheistic descendents of Shem any better off? No, not at all; for I have already charged that all men, both Jews monotheistic descenents of Shem and Greeks, are under the power of sin, as it is written: "None is righteous, no, not one;
;-)
Tia
;-)
No, seriously, I am just watching this thread because stuff like this fascinates me.
and it Is a good tagline!
Tia
Excellent point!
Are these the same folks that tell us violence in movies will not affect children? After all it's just a movie.
However, they believe TV/Movies can be used as a tool to influence human behavior. They say with just one viewing of "The Passion of The Christ" that the film will turn all of us into Antisemitic maniacs ready to punch the first Jew we can find right after we come out of the theater.
WOW! what a movie. That would make the "The Passion of The Christ" the most mind controlling movie of all times.
In closing, I think all of the rhetoric is just a publicity stunt.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.