Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Open space mission total waste of money
Aberdeen American News ^ | Jan. 25, 2004 | Donna Marmorstein

Posted on 01/25/2004 9:12:37 PM PST by jwalburg

Prescott: Have you heard what the president is proposing now?

Howell: Something about exploration, isn't it?

Prescott: Right. He wants to send a crew out into the great beyond to explore uncharted territory. Have you seen the price tag?

Howell: Yeah. And I understand that much of the funding goes into the pockets of the president's close buddies. One of the guys in charge served as his personal secretary for years, and the other is his good friend, William Clark.

Prescott: There should be an investigation.

Howell: Definitely!

Prescott: It's almost as bad as that Louisiana Purchase deal earlier in the year.

Howell: Talk about wasting taxpayer money on frivolities! No one was even asked about this. The president just went ahead and squandered all this money on a bunch of wasteland no one will ever use!

Prescott: You're telling me!

Howell: How much was it? Twelve million dollars??? Man, you could do a lot of important things with 12 million dollars.

Prescott: Our sailors are being starved from Navy cutbacks and we are going to send 47 men to scamper around the wilderness at government expense? And you know what? Everyone thinks this exploration deal was because of the Louisiana Purchase, but I happen to know that the president was making plans for this back in January, BEFORE there was even talk about purchasing the territory.

Howell: That's pretty incriminating stuff! The Congressional Budget Office should get on this right away.

Prescott: No, I think we'll need a special investigator for this one. The thing is, it isn't 12 million. The public is being told it's 12 million - as if that wasn't enough - but really it's 27 million, with interest figured in. Talk about deficit spending!

Howell: You're kidding me!

Prescott: No. I've looked at the figures. This stupid idea is costing taxpayers 27 million dollars! And for what? It's all a public relations move for Jefferson.

Howell: I heard he thinks that by adding all this land we'll seem big and bad to the Europeans. They won't want to mess with us.

Prescott: That, and the stupid Northwest Passage idea. Northwest Passage! Only pea-brains believe in that Northwest Passage theory. But there's Jefferson for you.

Howell: I understand the vice president has some shady motives for this expedition, too.

Prescott: Aaron Burr! That guy's got ulterior motives in everything he does. And this Lewis and Clark thing is no exception. You knew he lost his seat in the New York Assembly when suspicious financial dealings were leaked to the public, didn't you?

Howell: I heard something about that.

Prescott: Well, now I hear he's been scheming to build up a Trans-Appalachian Empire using new land from this Louisiana Purchase.

Howell: Talk about conflict of interest!

Prescott: I wouldn't be surprised if this whole deal was secretly engineered between Burr and the French. Jefferson is just a puppet, you know. He's been a failure at diplomacy on his own. Burr's behind everything.

Howell: Well, just look at the mess Jefferson made of the Declaration. "Endowed by our Creator!" You'd think the new Republic was run by Church of England fanatics, with language like that inserted in the thing!

Prescott: Did you know that Burr's grandfather was that preacher, Jonathan Edwards? The two of them are in the pocket of the religious right, that's for sure. The explorers have already started this asinine trip, with no real public input, no hearings, no committee debate, no environmental impact reports - nothing! They're taking 6 tons of supplies along, mostly to bribe Indians with. Six tons! And much of it on a stupid keelboat.

Howell: Wonder how far they'll get.

Prescott: I don't know, but there are sure better things to be done with that kind of money. You know what Fisher Ames says about the Louisiana Purchase? "Now - we rush like a comet into infinite space!" He's right! This is a crazy idea. And the Lewis and Clark business is even crazier.

Howell: About as crazy an idea as going to Mars! -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Donna Marmorstein writes and lives in Aberdeen. You can contact her at dkmarmorstein@yahoo.com.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; jefferson; lewisandclark; mars; space
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-130 next last
Instead of investing in space technolology, we could give all that money to Liberal Universities to study the mating habits of millipedes and how they coordinate all those legs, and other similar endeavors.
81 posted on 01/25/2004 11:46:14 PM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
My contribution to this thread: 35 years after Columbus, Cortes, Lewis and Clark etc, thousands of trappers and settlers were following them on their own dime.

Paying for their own ships and horses, and carving out homesteads, or returning with a profit on balance.

Thirty five years after Apollo, where are the moon settlers? Where is the lunar equivalent to the East India or Hudson Bay Companies?

There's a slight glitch, you see. It costs millions of dollars to put a poung of gear on the moon, and you can breath the air there. No settlers, no private enterprise.

If there were private moonbases paying their own way today, you would have a valid comparison to Lewis and Clark.

But there aren't, and you don't.

So I'll support a manned Mars mission, sure thing. Just as soon as the private moon bases are paying for themselves.

Otherwise, all we'll be paying for is a trillion dollar photo opportunity.

Robots can do the science, and 1% of the cost.

82 posted on 01/25/2004 11:46:54 PM PST by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: RLK
To travel any distance, it would take days, months, and years for radio communications to travel between any space vehicle and earth.

Ummm... Nope. Did it take months for the Apollo crews to talk back to the Earth? Even during the Voyager Neptune encounter, the light time was only about 4 hours.

83 posted on 01/25/2004 11:47:08 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
pound of gear on the moon, and you can't breath

Note to self: check spelling before posting when touch-typing while watching television.

84 posted on 01/25/2004 11:49:25 PM PST by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar
It seems to me that the Domingez-Escalante expedition only made it as far north as present-day Colorado. I believe they went the farthest north, feel free to correct me if I am wrong..

Lewis and Clark covered a lot of ground north of there, but were not the first. Not counting the indigenous residents, there were French trappers (and English) in the region, some of the early voyageurs and mountain men.

85 posted on 01/25/2004 11:53:04 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (This tagline manufactured in the U.S.A. and is certified prion-free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Robots can do the science, and 1% of the cost.

Not true. Robots can do great science indeed. However, remember Hadley Rille? Those MEN furthered our understanding of the origin of the moon. It is doubtful a robot explorer bringing back a few pounds of rock would have done that.

86 posted on 01/25/2004 11:54:35 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
I don't buy that we'll "never" be able to do anything.

Ask someone in the third century if it would ever be possible to speak to someone on the other side of the planet with an object that could fit inside his palm... He'd emphatically say "we could NEVER do something like that, are you crazy?!"

87 posted on 01/25/2004 11:56:16 PM PST by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
There aren't lunar bases because our mission was essentially a "beat the Russians" joy ride. Send a man to the moon and return him safely. We now have a much broader mission to establish a base, harvest the moons resources, go to Mars and then beyond. You may be happy letting China control the Moon and Mars, but I sure as hell am not.
88 posted on 01/25/2004 11:58:35 PM PST by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
So I'll support a manned Mars mission, sure thing. Just as soon as the private moon bases are paying for themselves.

I don't believe anyone has said, "Mars or Bust!". The only way we get to Mars is through our experiences on the Moon.

Robots can do the science, and 1% of the cost.

Have you ever looked at a photo of an outcrop, and then visited one? Ever looked at an image of a quartz crystal, and then held one in your hands? Bit of a difference, wouldn't you say? Several formations I have run into out in the field were initially identified on the basis of smell. Certain rocks can be identified by feel alone. Geomorphologists and structural geologists put together the history of a region by what they discover based on field observations. These are things that are all lost without the human component.

89 posted on 01/25/2004 11:58:41 PM PST by Aracelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: RLK
The nearest star is Alpha Centauri, if I remember correctly. It might have livable and productive planets similar to earth. It would be a potentially worthwhile trip. However, at 4 1/2 light years away it would require most of an adult lifetime to get there traveling 10,000 miles a second. If you hit a piece of space debris the suze of a pea at that speed, it would go through the space ship like a nuclear explosion.

It's one thing to be a man of vision and to talk about space travel. It's a far different to be a man of ignorant fantasy and hallucination. George Bush should have taken a course in Physics instead of guts courses.

"looking around", I don't see anyone else talking about star travel including President Bush. He was talking about the Moon and Mars.

90 posted on 01/25/2004 11:59:11 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar
Weren't the B2 (spirit) stealth bombers 2 billion a copy?
91 posted on 01/26/2004 12:00:09 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (This tagline manufactured in the U.S.A. and is certified prion-free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
I don't buy that we'll "never" be able to do anything.

We can't "land" on Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune because they're gaseous. ......there's no solid surface to land on.

92 posted on 01/26/2004 12:01:30 AM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Ok! :-)

I was thinking of the problems of attempting to "land" on one of those planets. I sure like using those moons however. :-)
93 posted on 01/26/2004 12:01:32 AM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
Uranus is gaseous?
94 posted on 01/26/2004 12:02:50 AM PST by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
lol
95 posted on 01/26/2004 12:03:04 AM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar; Mortimer Snavely
The technology drain is a problem, and I won't solve that in this discussion. (As if I could solve it in any other...)

But it is important to remember how technology transforms an economy. I'm probably speaking to the choir here, but no matter... You can never eliminate poverty because poverty is relative. You will always have some people who for various reasons are less able to integrate or engage economically than others.

But just as a rising tide lifts even little leaky boats, technology redefines everything. In some countries poverty means building your shelter out of materials you scrounge yourself, and dying of diarrhea.

In the US, poverty means you have a $5 digital watch that is better than any watch a Lord of London could have bought with all his fortune a short time ago, you have a color television, homeless people are stinking up the public library while they surf the internet, and you will get better medical treatment than any titan of industry of a generation ago, and all you have to do is wait your turn at ER while they tend to the gunshot wounds first.

The technology that spun off from the earlier moonshots entered the economy in various ways; computer companies developed technologies for the program that were later marketed to the general public. Engineers that get dumped onto the economy during some NASA budget crunch go to work for mainstream companies and bring specialized knowledge with them, or start their own little companies doing whatever. The technologies seep out into the general economy and there are shifts that change everything even though hardly anyone notices.
96 posted on 01/26/2004 12:03:39 AM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Naughty! :^)
97 posted on 01/26/2004 12:04:44 AM PST by Aracelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
Io Io so its off to work I go, on Io
98 posted on 01/26/2004 12:06:42 AM PST by DeepDish (I no longer capitalize french or france, only things proper or significant are capitalized.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
Well, let's be a little creative and consider the possibility that there may still be solid mass inside Uranus (or Neptune, Jupiter, Saturn), even if it is otherwise gaseous. I don't believe our science has been able to rule such a possibility out. It may be 3000 years before we'd have the technology necessary to send a man inside a gas giant planet, and return safely. It may be never. But I am not arrogant enough to say "never".
99 posted on 01/26/2004 12:06:42 AM PST by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
Must get some sleep...heavy day at school tomorrow. Best anyway to leave you to the Luddites, you're much nicer and more polite than me anyway. Smoochies! ;^)
100 posted on 01/26/2004 12:08:14 AM PST by Aracelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-130 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson