Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

So you think George W. Bush is not a conservative?
SOTU transcript ^ | 1/22/04

Posted on 01/22/2004 7:07:09 AM PST by Wolfstar

ED. NOTE: On Tuesday evening, January 20, 2004, the President of the United States gave one of the most conservative State of the Union addresses in at least a generation. For a SOTU speech, it had a remarkably short spending wish list. Instead, it had passages such as those excerpted below — none of which would have been spoken by a Democrat or liberal (i.e., Leftist), or even a "RINO." Check it out:

[BEGIN EXCERPTS: Bold/underscore emphasis by Wolfstar]

Our greatest responsibility is the active defense of the American people. Twenty-eight months have passed since September 11th, 2001 — over two years without an attack on American soil. And it is tempting to believe that the danger is behind us. That hope is understandable, comforting — and false.

[SNIP]

The once all-powerful ruler of Iraq was found in a hole, and now sits in a prison cell. Of the top 55 officials of the former regime, we have captured or killed 45. Our forces are on the offensive, leading over 1,600 patrols a day and conducting an average of 180 raids a week. We are dealing with these thugs in Iraq, just as surely as we dealt with Saddam Hussein's evil regime.

Because of American leadership and resolve, the world is changing for the better. Last month, the leader of Libya voluntarily pledged to disclose and dismantle all of his regime's weapons of mass destruction programs, including a uranium enrichment project for nuclear weapons.

[SNIP]

Nine months of intense negotiations involving the United States and Great Britain succeeded with Libya, while 12 years of diplomacy with Iraq did not. And one reason is clear: For diplomacy to be effective, words must be credible, and no one can now doubt the word of America.

Many of our troops are listening tonight. And I want you and your families to know: America is proud of you. And my administration, and this Congress, will give you the resources you need to fight and win the war on terror.

I know that some people question if America is really in a war at all. They view terrorism more as a crime, a problem to be solved mainly with law enforcement and indictments. After the World Trade Center was first attacked in 1993, some of the guilty were indicted and tried and convicted, and sent to prison. But the matter was not settled. The terrorists were still training and plotting in other nations, and drawing up more ambitious plans. After the chaos and carnage of September the 11th, it is not enough to serve our enemies with legal papers. The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States, and war is what they got.

[SNIP]

Some critics have said our duties in Iraq must be internationalized. This particular criticism is hard to explain to our partners in Britain, Australia, Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Thailand, Italy, Spain, Poland, Denmark, Hungary, Bulgaria, Ukraine, Romania, the Netherlands — (applause) — Norway, El Salvador, and the 17 other countries that have committed troops to Iraq. As we debate at home, we must never ignore the vital contributions of our international partners, or dismiss their sacrifices.

From the beginning, America has sought international support for our operations in Afghanistan and Iraq, and we have gained much support. There is a difference, however, between leading a coalition of many nations, and submitting to the objections of a few. America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our country.

We also hear doubts that democracy is a realistic goal for the greater Middle East, where freedom is rare. Yet it is mistaken, and condescending, to assume that whole cultures and great religions are incompatible with liberty and self-government. I believe that God has planted in every human heart the desire to live in freedom. And even when that desire is crushed by tyranny for decades, it will rise again.

[SNIP]

In the last three years, adversity has also revealed the fundamental strengths of the American economy. We have come through recession, and terrorist attack, and corporate scandals, and the uncertainties of war. And because you acted to stimulate our economy with tax relief, this economy is strong, and growing stronger.

You have doubled the child tax credit from $500 to $1,000, reduced the marriage penalty, begun to phase out the death tax, reduced taxes on capital gains and stock dividends, cut taxes on small businesses, and you have lowered taxes for every American who pays income taxes.

Americans took those dollars and put them to work, driving this economy forward. The pace of economic growth in the third quarter of 2003 was the fastest in nearly 20 years; new home construction, the highest in almost 20 years; home ownership rates, the highest ever. Manufacturing activity is increasing. Inflation is low. Interest rates are low. Exports are growing. Productivity is high, and jobs are on the rise.

These numbers confirm that the American people are using their money far better than government would have — and you were right to return it.

[SNIP]

We're requiring higher standards [in schools]. We are regularly testing every child on the fundamentals. We are reporting results to parents, and making sure they have better options when schools are not performing.

[SNIP]

We must continue to pursue an aggressive, pro-growth economic agenda. Congress has some unfinished business on the issue of taxes. The tax reductions you passed are set to expire. Unless you act — (applause) — unless you act — unless you act, the unfair tax on marriage will go back up. Unless you act, millions of families will be charged $300 more in federal taxes for every child. Unless you act, small businesses will pay higher taxes. Unless you act, the death tax will eventually come back to life. Unless you act, Americans face a tax increase. What Congress has given, the Congress should not take away. For the sake of job growth, the tax cuts you passed should be permanent.

Our agenda for jobs and growth must help small business owners and employees with relief from needless federal regulation, and protect them from junk and frivolous lawsuits.

Consumers and businesses need reliable supplies of energy to make our economy run — so I urge you to pass legislation to modernize our electricity system, promote conservation, and make America less dependent on foreign sources of energy.

My administration is promoting free and fair trade to open up new markets for America's entrepreneurs and manufacturers and farmers — to create jobs for American workers. Younger workers should have the opportunity to build a nest egg by saving part of their Social Security taxes in a personal retirement account. We should make the Social Security system a source of ownership for the American people.

[SNIP]

In two weeks, I will send you a budget that funds the war, protects the homeland, and meets important domestic needs, while limiting the growth in discretionary spending to less than 4 percent. This will require that Congress focus on priorities, cut wasteful spending, and be wise with the people's money. By doing so, we can cut the deficit in half over the next five years.

Tonight, I also ask you to reform our immigration laws so they reflect our values and benefit our economy.

[SNIP]

I oppose amnesty, because it would encourage further illegal immigration, and unfairly reward those who break our laws. My temporary worker program will preserve the citizenship path for those who respect the law, while bringing millions of hardworking men and women out from the shadows of American life.

[ED. NOTE: The precedent for guest worker programs goes back at least to the Eisenhower administration.]

[SNIP]

In January of 2006, seniors can get prescription drug coverage under Medicare. For a monthly premium of about $35, most seniors who do not have that coverage today can expect to see their drug bills cut roughly in half. Under this reform, senior citizens will be able to keep their Medicare just as it is, or they can choose a Medicare plan that fits them best — just as you, as members of Congress, can choose an insurance plan that meets your needs. And starting this year, millions of Americans will be able to save money tax-free for their medical expenses in a health savings account.

[SNIP]

On the critical issue of health care, our goal is to ensure that Americans can choose and afford private health care coverage that best fits their individual needs.

[SNIP]

Small businesses should be able to band together and negotiate for lower insurance rates, so they can cover more workers with health insurance. I urge you to pass association health plans. I ask you to give lower-income Americans a refundable tax credit that would allow millions to buy their own basic health insurance.

[SNIP]

To protect the doctor-patient relationship, and keep good doctors doing good work, we must eliminate wasteful and frivolous medical lawsuits. And tonight I propose that individuals who buy catastrophic health care coverage, as part of our new health savings accounts, be allowed to deduct 100 percent of the premiums from their taxes.

A government-run health care system is the wrong prescription. By keeping costs under control, expanding access, and helping more Americans afford coverage, we will preserve the system of private medicine that makes America's health care the best in the world.

[SNIP]

One of the worst decisions our children can make is to gamble their lives and futures on drugs. Our government is helping parents confront this problem with aggressive education, treatment, and law enforcement. Drug use in high school has declined by 11 percent over the last two years. Four hundred thousand fewer young people are using illegal drugs than in the year 2001.

[SNIP]

A strong America must also value the institution of marriage. I believe we should respect individuals as we take a principled stand for one of the most fundamental, enduring institutions of our civilization. Congress has already taken a stand on this issue by passing the Defense of Marriage Act, signed in 1996 by President Clinton. That statute protects marriage under federal law as a union of a man and a woman, and declares that one state may not redefine marriage for other states.

Activist judges, however, have begun redefining marriage by court order, without regard for the will of the people and their elected representatives. On an issue of such great consequence, the people's voice must be heard. If judges insist on forcing their arbitrary will upon the people, the only alternative left to the people would be the constitutional process. Our nation must defend the sanctity of marriage.

[SNIP]

It's also important to strengthen our communities by unleashing the compassion of America's religious institutions. Religious charities of every creed are doing some of the most vital work in our country — mentoring children, feeding the hungry, taking the hand of the lonely. Yet government has often denied social service grants and contracts to these groups, just because they have a cross or a Star of David or a crescent on the wall. By executive order, I have opened billions of dollars in grant money to competition that includes faith-based charities. Tonight I ask you to codify this into law, so people of faith can know that the law will never discriminate against them again.

[SNIP]

The momentum of freedom in our world is unmistakable — and it is not carried forward by our power alone. We can trust in that greater power who guides the unfolding of the years. And in all that is to come, we can know that His purposes are just and true.

[END EXCERPTS]


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; bushamnesty; sotu
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 921-940941-960961-980 ... 2,001-2,015 next last
To: skip2myloo
Well said.The Schumer /Clinton filidisguster in the Senate is driving me nuts on the judiciary votes,too.
941 posted on 01/22/2004 11:57:35 AM PST by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 924 | View Replies]

To: exmarine
I agree with you, I just couldn't resist because I saw it coming (and was tempted to say something along the same lines you did).

I've seen some things said in this thread, that I could imagine the person saying them is screaming, ranting, spitting and hitting their monitor and just working themselves into a frenzy over the fact that there are people who disagree with them or vote differently than them.

942 posted on 01/22/2004 11:58:12 AM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 920 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
You will of course forgive me if I'm not swayed by the extra large font and the supposed score.
943 posted on 01/22/2004 11:58:28 AM PST by Bikers4Bush (Constitution party here I come. Write in Tancredo in 04'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 868 | View Replies]

To: BureaucratusMaximus
That is why I am looking for a third option.
944 posted on 01/22/2004 11:58:39 AM PST by RiflemanSharpe (An American for a more socially and fiscally conservation America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 940 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents

How dense are you people?

I don't know, I was just responding to your statement found here

Voting third party at a time of war, both at home and abroad, when the only real choices are a moderately conservative (or conservatively moderate) incumbent, and the incarnation of evil in our society, is lunacy.

with a quote from George Washington and what parties would, and have, done to this nation of states. Did I get a response? Of course not!! I was called 'dense'.

And I cant really see how statements from his speech show beyond doubt that his principles are conservative. I don't see how the latest handout announced, no downpayments of FHA loans and more money to community colleges, are necessarily conservative. Rather it's something I would have expected from LBJ or Jimmy Carter

945 posted on 01/22/2004 11:58:58 AM PST by billbears (Deo Vindice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 880 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
I believe President Bush is the man for this time in history.

YES !!!!!! Can any honest person imagine 9-11 and the aftermath with a President Gore and tell me there is no difference?

Those who insist that it has to be the whole loaf or no loaf at all are destined to be hungry and refuse to live in a world of reality.

946 posted on 01/22/2004 11:59:18 AM PST by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 918 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras
When the next Hillary type is in charge, it will be crystal clear to all.

I agree with you on this, and we can never take the sunset clause out of it. Ashcroft is taking the heat for nothing right now, but if Clinton had this law during the impeachment, he would have used it against his enemies, with full force, and the ACLU would be suddenly missing.

947 posted on 01/22/2004 11:59:32 AM PST by woodyinscc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 891 | View Replies]

To: RiflemanSharpe
A third way ??

OH NO, that's a completely different discussion, let's not go there !! :-)

948 posted on 01/22/2004 12:00:10 PM PST by skip2myloo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 944 | View Replies]

To: billbears
"Party politics never overrule principle"

Would that it were so.
949 posted on 01/22/2004 12:00:32 PM PST by Bikers4Bush (Constitution party here I come. Write in Tancredo in 04'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 873 | View Replies]

To: exmarine; MEG33
Meg is a lady & you exmarine are a gentleman!

For what it is worth, I commend you both!

950 posted on 01/22/2004 12:00:44 PM PST by DollyCali (2004: Opportunity for love, growth, giving, doing..... It is our choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 923 | View Replies]

To: William Wallace
YEEEEEEEEEHAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW.

Looks like he could use a better chair; there's a web site somewhere that gives one away every once in a while.
951 posted on 01/22/2004 12:01:08 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 907 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
A very significant portion of Bush's increases have been for descretionary non-defense spending. Here are his numbers compared to a true conservative.

Spending by Department
Percent Change in Real Outlays in First Three Years
Department Reagan Bush
Agriculture -13.2% 8.5%
Commerce -29.0% 9.6%
Defense 18.6% 27.6%
Education -21.8% 60.8%
Energy -19.6% 22.4%
Health & Human Services 9.0% 21.4%
Housing & Urban Dev. -3.7% 6.1%
Interior -4.6% 23.4%
Justice 1.2% 11.0%
Labor -29.4% 56.0%
State 9.5% 32.5%
Transportation -13.0% -1.3%
Treasury 31.1% -7.0%
Veteran Affairs -3.9% 29.4%


source: Budget of the U.S. Government and Mid-Session Review for FY2004.
952 posted on 01/22/2004 12:02:00 PM PST by Your Nightmare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 895 | View Replies]

To: skip2myloo
I meant a third party, the Constitution Party to be precise.
953 posted on 01/22/2004 12:02:04 PM PST by RiflemanSharpe (An American for a more socially and fiscally conservation America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 948 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
"You may call yourself a conservative, Biker, but you don't share the VALUES of Conservatives."

Aaaaah, to be chided by the rightous. How nice.
954 posted on 01/22/2004 12:03:24 PM PST by Bikers4Bush (Constitution party here I come. Write in Tancredo in 04'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 887 | View Replies]

To: BureaucratusMaximus
My dear,there are many voices and opinions on who is a rino,what a rino is. The arguments are as endless and as fruitless as who is a conservative,what is conservatism,what is a true conservative,etc.Why bother when the conversation will not change any opinions.

BUSH/CHENEY 04..FOR THE SAKE OF OUR NATION
955 posted on 01/22/2004 12:04:15 PM PST by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 940 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
At this point I only believe it.

And the difference is?

Truth is ... You have already convicted him .. all because a senators aid said so

Nice

956 posted on 01/22/2004 12:04:27 PM PST by Mo1 (Join the dollar a day crowd now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 921 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
Lookup double entendre and be enlightened.

957 posted on 01/22/2004 12:04:36 PM PST by Bikers4Bush (Constitution party here I come. Write in Tancredo in 04'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 893 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
Again, only to you.
958 posted on 01/22/2004 12:05:32 PM PST by Bikers4Bush (Constitution party here I come. Write in Tancredo in 04'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 900 | View Replies]

To: RiflemanSharpe
As I said, fine, if that's what your conscience truly dictates.

But be fully aware of what you are risking by doing so.

The future of America in the hands of the Democrats is, IMO, a fearful thing, because they hate the very values we stand for.

I don't like the spending either, but to me, the cost of a Dem in office is far greater than the money spent. It's the very SOUL of this nation that will be lost.

959 posted on 01/22/2004 12:05:37 PM PST by ohioWfan (BUSH 2004 - Leadership, Integrity, Morality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 935 | View Replies]

To: RiflemanSharpe
That is why I am looking for a third option.

(snicker) I thought about that...but its a moot point. Bush will win by a landslide come November. Its a useless presidential vote in my democratic controlled political-hell-hole state of Illinois anyway. Even dead people vote democrat here.

960 posted on 01/22/2004 12:05:52 PM PST by BureaucratusMaximus (Principled conservatives need not apply...we're all centrists now. Shut up & pay your taxes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 944 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 921-940941-960961-980 ... 2,001-2,015 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson