Skip to comments.
So you think George W. Bush is not a conservative?
SOTU transcript ^
| 1/22/04
Posted on 01/22/2004 7:07:09 AM PST by Wolfstar
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 781-800, 801-820, 821-840 ... 2,001-2,015 next last
To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
Feel free to use (and modify it). It would be the second of my comments to get to be a tag line. (Brag, brag.)
801
posted on
01/22/2004 11:09:28 AM PST
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: Bikers4Bush
"I'll get in line for my turn at you trying to kick my a$$. "
Instead, why don't you get in line for your turn to learn how to read?
802
posted on
01/22/2004 11:09:41 AM PST
by
zook
To: Wolfstar
Great post - thanks.
Of course he is conservative - compassionate conservative. When they find an ultra right wing conservative they can get elected, great.
Of course, they don't have it now and will not because they throw their votes to democrats - the true conservative move in their minds.
But, I'm tired of talking to them. Let them throw their votes over to the democrats in a 50/50 nation. Very smart move for conservatism - yes - a great move for this country. Conservatism will surely come forth with socialists in power.
803
posted on
01/22/2004 11:10:14 AM PST
by
ClancyJ
(It's just not safe to vote Democratic.)
To: zook
Again, I invite you to write the moderator of this website and see what they have to say about your "thought police" idea. I would love to see their response.
804
posted on
01/22/2004 11:10:19 AM PST
by
exmarine
( sic semper tyrannis)
To: MEG33
You think a dem senate would up military spending and cut domestic programs?
In the current situation, yes. If a Rep Prez asked for it. The Dem congress did for Reagan and we weren't in a "hot" war.
They cut military and up domestic. Both parties are feeding at the pig trough.PORKIES
They can't up domestic if the Prez doesn't sign the bills. Of course, the Prez would have to find that veto stamp...where did that thing go? Domestic spending was much slower under Clinton with a Rep congress than the current situation. Actually, Carter didn't spend this much
with a Dem congress.
http://www.cato.org/dailys/07-31-03.html
To: Southack
Dean is fiscally conservative
No, he had well-funded mandates due to a boom economy. He did not cut spending, he jacked it up. He, like Bush now, would not cut spending to compensate for the economic downturn. A real fiscal conservative would cut spending instead of spending money like a...well...like a nanny-state liberal.
being frugal isn't the same thing as being conservative.
Completely agree, well-funded mandate and all.
All the other stuff(Kyoto et al) is fine and proves Bush is not an idiot.
Finally, as far as abortion: I would rather vote for a pro-choice true fiscal conservative that will cut spending and big government programs than a anti-abortion big-spender.
Okay, finally for real, I'm not sure how I feel about the whole immigration plan. I have to wait and see how that plays out.
806
posted on
01/22/2004 11:10:54 AM PST
by
BJClinton
(Vote Democrat, it's easier than thinking.)
To: BureaucratusMaximus; Howlin
I'm the one who originally said that.
Surely you wouldn't deny the statement that preceded it - that we will either have a Democrat in the White House next January, or we will have President Bush.
That is the choice.
You have apparently made yours.
I just hope the rest of us don't have to live with a Democrat president just because of the thumb-sucking bed-wetters who can't find anything about President Bush (tax cuts, PBA ban, IICC, etc.) to appreciate.
To hell with the Democrats, and to hell with their "real conservative" accomplices.
To: Wolfstar
And an angel still rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm. (This is just a beginning.)Amen!
808
posted on
01/22/2004 11:11:07 AM PST
by
ohioWfan
(BUSH 2004 - Leadership, Integrity, Morality)
To: MJY1288; m1-lightning
Take for an example, the quote you posted, somehow that direct quote from the POTUS has become something totally different in the minds of some here. To argue over it is as useless as asking a blind man if he likes the new high definition Plasma TV's
It's useless, because it was the wrong quote. See #750. m1-lightning rebutted a quote at #675 that I didhn't use at #428.
|
809
posted on
01/22/2004 11:11:37 AM PST
by
Sabertooth
(Pakistani Illegal Aliens Deport Themselves - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1058591/posts)
To: Protagoras
I didn't concede a vote for Bush would not..you are plainly against Bush,so I concede you don't think so.My statements are only my opinion.It is based on reality of third party voting history and history of the democratic voting .Consevative dems in the Congress and the Senate are a disappearing group.
810
posted on
01/22/2004 11:11:52 AM PST
by
MEG33
To: Doctor Stochastic
That's your own? I am impressed. (I thought you were quoting someone.)
To: Bikers4Bush
....He has lost my vote, it's up to him to earn it back. So far he is failing miserably.
......
So, enjoy the democrats - your party. Bush will not be calling to find out what you want him to do - but you might stay by the phone just in case.
I imagine Bush will do what he thinks best.
812
posted on
01/22/2004 11:12:05 AM PST
by
ClancyJ
(It's just not safe to vote Democratic.)
To: MEG33
I'm not sure if that was a slam or not.
813
posted on
01/22/2004 11:12:07 AM PST
by
Bikers4Bush
(Constitution party here I come. Write in Tancredo in 04'!)
To: Bikers4Bush; JFC
I'm curious about your screen name. You clearly aren't "4Bush." Does that mean you're not a biker either?
814
posted on
01/22/2004 11:12:09 AM PST
by
My2Cents
("Failure is not an option.")
To: Sabertooth
So, under the Bush Amnesty, "temporary workers," millions of whom would be legalized-Illegals, "will be allowed to apply in the normal way" for U.S. citizenship. I see nothing wrong with temporary workers applying for a green card in the same manner that every non-"temporary worker" foreigner does. I would detest if Bush were simply granting them green cards for working here.
815
posted on
01/22/2004 11:12:58 AM PST
by
m1-lightning
(Weapons of deterrence do not deter terrorists; people of deterrence do.)
To: George W. Bush
>
Extremists will NEVER get to vote FOR anyone. That is the nature of the universe.
Completely wrong.
It was the gun-rights 'extremists' who elected the Republican House in '94. And they were far more effective in implementing a conservative agenda than anything Bush has done.
It was largely those same 'extremists' who defeated Gore in Arkansas and Tennessee in 2000.
>
I know of no statistical evidence to support either of these presumptions.
Indeed, mathematics preclude those presumptions being true. By definition, extremists are a group small in number. You are therefore incorrect.
816
posted on
01/22/2004 11:13:23 AM PST
by
Owen
To: Protagoras
I like my first amendment rightsAlbeit President Bush signed the CFR Bill, but it was the SCOTUS that gave it legitimacy. We will never get righteous Judges from the libs.
like my privacy
Has the Patriot Act impacted your life, or is it the myriad of needless and nonsensencicle laws passed down by State and local Gov.?
I like the enforcement of immigration laws.
President Bush's proposals are just that. This issue has been kicked down the road far too long. I will be on your side in asking for the right solution.
I like my private schools private.
So does President Bush.
I like the government to abstain from getting involved in having children piss in bottles.
If we get back to strong family's and charitable communities with no Gov. intervention, there should be no need of this.(I know I am being idealistic)
To: exmarine
"I think Hitler said something similar. I think you need to read the 1st amendment."
See, if you jab 'em enough, they'll go nutzo.
The First Amendment has nothing to do with whether or not the owner of a private opinion forum must allow you to post tripe.
Are you related to Howard Dean, by the way?
818
posted on
01/22/2004 11:14:05 AM PST
by
zook
To: Howlin
You're under the impression this is a game? And you're under the impression any of this matters?
819
posted on
01/22/2004 11:14:30 AM PST
by
Nanodik
(Libertarian, Ex-Canadian)
To: Neets
I am deeply saddened that none of you bothered to ping me to this thread.
Estoy apesadumbrado
Intentaré hacer mejor
820
posted on
01/22/2004 11:15:28 AM PST
by
deport
( Owen, Kuhl, Brown, Pickering, Pryor, Allen.. [Estrada, they won])
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 781-800, 801-820, 821-840 ... 2,001-2,015 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson