Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

So you think George W. Bush is not a conservative?
SOTU transcript ^ | 1/22/04

Posted on 01/22/2004 7:07:09 AM PST by Wolfstar

ED. NOTE: On Tuesday evening, January 20, 2004, the President of the United States gave one of the most conservative State of the Union addresses in at least a generation. For a SOTU speech, it had a remarkably short spending wish list. Instead, it had passages such as those excerpted below — none of which would have been spoken by a Democrat or liberal (i.e., Leftist), or even a "RINO." Check it out:

[BEGIN EXCERPTS: Bold/underscore emphasis by Wolfstar]

Our greatest responsibility is the active defense of the American people. Twenty-eight months have passed since September 11th, 2001 — over two years without an attack on American soil. And it is tempting to believe that the danger is behind us. That hope is understandable, comforting — and false.

[SNIP]

The once all-powerful ruler of Iraq was found in a hole, and now sits in a prison cell. Of the top 55 officials of the former regime, we have captured or killed 45. Our forces are on the offensive, leading over 1,600 patrols a day and conducting an average of 180 raids a week. We are dealing with these thugs in Iraq, just as surely as we dealt with Saddam Hussein's evil regime.

Because of American leadership and resolve, the world is changing for the better. Last month, the leader of Libya voluntarily pledged to disclose and dismantle all of his regime's weapons of mass destruction programs, including a uranium enrichment project for nuclear weapons.

[SNIP]

Nine months of intense negotiations involving the United States and Great Britain succeeded with Libya, while 12 years of diplomacy with Iraq did not. And one reason is clear: For diplomacy to be effective, words must be credible, and no one can now doubt the word of America.

Many of our troops are listening tonight. And I want you and your families to know: America is proud of you. And my administration, and this Congress, will give you the resources you need to fight and win the war on terror.

I know that some people question if America is really in a war at all. They view terrorism more as a crime, a problem to be solved mainly with law enforcement and indictments. After the World Trade Center was first attacked in 1993, some of the guilty were indicted and tried and convicted, and sent to prison. But the matter was not settled. The terrorists were still training and plotting in other nations, and drawing up more ambitious plans. After the chaos and carnage of September the 11th, it is not enough to serve our enemies with legal papers. The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States, and war is what they got.

[SNIP]

Some critics have said our duties in Iraq must be internationalized. This particular criticism is hard to explain to our partners in Britain, Australia, Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Thailand, Italy, Spain, Poland, Denmark, Hungary, Bulgaria, Ukraine, Romania, the Netherlands — (applause) — Norway, El Salvador, and the 17 other countries that have committed troops to Iraq. As we debate at home, we must never ignore the vital contributions of our international partners, or dismiss their sacrifices.

From the beginning, America has sought international support for our operations in Afghanistan and Iraq, and we have gained much support. There is a difference, however, between leading a coalition of many nations, and submitting to the objections of a few. America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our country.

We also hear doubts that democracy is a realistic goal for the greater Middle East, where freedom is rare. Yet it is mistaken, and condescending, to assume that whole cultures and great religions are incompatible with liberty and self-government. I believe that God has planted in every human heart the desire to live in freedom. And even when that desire is crushed by tyranny for decades, it will rise again.

[SNIP]

In the last three years, adversity has also revealed the fundamental strengths of the American economy. We have come through recession, and terrorist attack, and corporate scandals, and the uncertainties of war. And because you acted to stimulate our economy with tax relief, this economy is strong, and growing stronger.

You have doubled the child tax credit from $500 to $1,000, reduced the marriage penalty, begun to phase out the death tax, reduced taxes on capital gains and stock dividends, cut taxes on small businesses, and you have lowered taxes for every American who pays income taxes.

Americans took those dollars and put them to work, driving this economy forward. The pace of economic growth in the third quarter of 2003 was the fastest in nearly 20 years; new home construction, the highest in almost 20 years; home ownership rates, the highest ever. Manufacturing activity is increasing. Inflation is low. Interest rates are low. Exports are growing. Productivity is high, and jobs are on the rise.

These numbers confirm that the American people are using their money far better than government would have — and you were right to return it.

[SNIP]

We're requiring higher standards [in schools]. We are regularly testing every child on the fundamentals. We are reporting results to parents, and making sure they have better options when schools are not performing.

[SNIP]

We must continue to pursue an aggressive, pro-growth economic agenda. Congress has some unfinished business on the issue of taxes. The tax reductions you passed are set to expire. Unless you act — (applause) — unless you act — unless you act, the unfair tax on marriage will go back up. Unless you act, millions of families will be charged $300 more in federal taxes for every child. Unless you act, small businesses will pay higher taxes. Unless you act, the death tax will eventually come back to life. Unless you act, Americans face a tax increase. What Congress has given, the Congress should not take away. For the sake of job growth, the tax cuts you passed should be permanent.

Our agenda for jobs and growth must help small business owners and employees with relief from needless federal regulation, and protect them from junk and frivolous lawsuits.

Consumers and businesses need reliable supplies of energy to make our economy run — so I urge you to pass legislation to modernize our electricity system, promote conservation, and make America less dependent on foreign sources of energy.

My administration is promoting free and fair trade to open up new markets for America's entrepreneurs and manufacturers and farmers — to create jobs for American workers. Younger workers should have the opportunity to build a nest egg by saving part of their Social Security taxes in a personal retirement account. We should make the Social Security system a source of ownership for the American people.

[SNIP]

In two weeks, I will send you a budget that funds the war, protects the homeland, and meets important domestic needs, while limiting the growth in discretionary spending to less than 4 percent. This will require that Congress focus on priorities, cut wasteful spending, and be wise with the people's money. By doing so, we can cut the deficit in half over the next five years.

Tonight, I also ask you to reform our immigration laws so they reflect our values and benefit our economy.

[SNIP]

I oppose amnesty, because it would encourage further illegal immigration, and unfairly reward those who break our laws. My temporary worker program will preserve the citizenship path for those who respect the law, while bringing millions of hardworking men and women out from the shadows of American life.

[ED. NOTE: The precedent for guest worker programs goes back at least to the Eisenhower administration.]

[SNIP]

In January of 2006, seniors can get prescription drug coverage under Medicare. For a monthly premium of about $35, most seniors who do not have that coverage today can expect to see their drug bills cut roughly in half. Under this reform, senior citizens will be able to keep their Medicare just as it is, or they can choose a Medicare plan that fits them best — just as you, as members of Congress, can choose an insurance plan that meets your needs. And starting this year, millions of Americans will be able to save money tax-free for their medical expenses in a health savings account.

[SNIP]

On the critical issue of health care, our goal is to ensure that Americans can choose and afford private health care coverage that best fits their individual needs.

[SNIP]

Small businesses should be able to band together and negotiate for lower insurance rates, so they can cover more workers with health insurance. I urge you to pass association health plans. I ask you to give lower-income Americans a refundable tax credit that would allow millions to buy their own basic health insurance.

[SNIP]

To protect the doctor-patient relationship, and keep good doctors doing good work, we must eliminate wasteful and frivolous medical lawsuits. And tonight I propose that individuals who buy catastrophic health care coverage, as part of our new health savings accounts, be allowed to deduct 100 percent of the premiums from their taxes.

A government-run health care system is the wrong prescription. By keeping costs under control, expanding access, and helping more Americans afford coverage, we will preserve the system of private medicine that makes America's health care the best in the world.

[SNIP]

One of the worst decisions our children can make is to gamble their lives and futures on drugs. Our government is helping parents confront this problem with aggressive education, treatment, and law enforcement. Drug use in high school has declined by 11 percent over the last two years. Four hundred thousand fewer young people are using illegal drugs than in the year 2001.

[SNIP]

A strong America must also value the institution of marriage. I believe we should respect individuals as we take a principled stand for one of the most fundamental, enduring institutions of our civilization. Congress has already taken a stand on this issue by passing the Defense of Marriage Act, signed in 1996 by President Clinton. That statute protects marriage under federal law as a union of a man and a woman, and declares that one state may not redefine marriage for other states.

Activist judges, however, have begun redefining marriage by court order, without regard for the will of the people and their elected representatives. On an issue of such great consequence, the people's voice must be heard. If judges insist on forcing their arbitrary will upon the people, the only alternative left to the people would be the constitutional process. Our nation must defend the sanctity of marriage.

[SNIP]

It's also important to strengthen our communities by unleashing the compassion of America's religious institutions. Religious charities of every creed are doing some of the most vital work in our country — mentoring children, feeding the hungry, taking the hand of the lonely. Yet government has often denied social service grants and contracts to these groups, just because they have a cross or a Star of David or a crescent on the wall. By executive order, I have opened billions of dollars in grant money to competition that includes faith-based charities. Tonight I ask you to codify this into law, so people of faith can know that the law will never discriminate against them again.

[SNIP]

The momentum of freedom in our world is unmistakable — and it is not carried forward by our power alone. We can trust in that greater power who guides the unfolding of the years. And in all that is to come, we can know that His purposes are just and true.

[END EXCERPTS]


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; bushamnesty; sotu
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,381-1,4001,401-1,4201,421-1,440 ... 2,001-2,015 next last
To: deport
LP?
1,401 posted on 01/22/2004 4:34:10 PM PST by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1399 | View Replies]

To: Ophiucus
These are charges up with I will not put!
1,402 posted on 01/22/2004 4:38:59 PM PST by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1397 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Thanks for the "ping"...Have bookmarked!
1,403 posted on 01/22/2004 4:41:25 PM PST by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
No matter how heated a debate gets, I rarely ever leave a thread harboring bad feelings about the people I argued with unless it happens over and over again with the same person. There is only one such person on this thread. (and it's not you.) I have tried to be polite in these heated discussions but the debates quickly turn to arguing then to silly word games and dirty fighting. It makes everyone participating in the thread look bad. You would think a group of adults could debate with civility, but I guess not.
1,404 posted on 01/22/2004 4:43:11 PM PST by honeygrl (If you think the Constitution Party is such a joke, then why do you seem so afraid of it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1355 | View Replies]

To: deport
Since you know the Brigadiers, a question..... Where is Arator at these days?

Last I heard, he was on some anti-FReeper forum. As I recall, I read that he left or was banned at one rival forum and then started or joined another. (I'm not counting that first website that he started.)

As far as I'm concerned, FR's management gave him and the few others who got banned plenty of chances to get along and stay here at FR. For the rest of the Brigade, we generally followed JimRob's guidelines and some of us are still here. Nearly all voted for Bush in the end.
1,405 posted on 01/22/2004 4:45:20 PM PST by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1399 | View Replies]

To: deport
"Where is Arator at these days?"

Here y'go:

http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=35027&Disp=All&#C67
1,406 posted on 01/22/2004 4:45:44 PM PST by Jim Robinson (I don't belong to no organized political party. I'm a Republycan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1399 | View Replies]

To: onyx
they change their criteria more than I suspect, that they change their underwear

Naw - they stick to the same ones until they're old and crusty....their criteria that is ;-)

1,407 posted on 01/22/2004 4:45:49 PM PST by Ophiucus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1375 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
for some of us who "don't know".. what is the brigade?
1,408 posted on 01/22/2004 4:46:36 PM PST by DollyCali (2004: Opportunity for love, growth, giving, doing..... It is our choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1405 | View Replies]

To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
There's not a dime's worth of difference between you all and Democrats these days.

When you boil it down, both Bushbots and bashbots hurl exactly this same charge at each other, sometimes hundreds of times in a thread like this one.
1,409 posted on 01/22/2004 4:47:43 PM PST by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1400 | View Replies]

To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
Yeah right.I'm not in the mood for b***h fest and didn't address you in the first place. So bug off.
1,410 posted on 01/22/2004 4:50:27 PM PST by novacation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1400 | View Replies]

To: deport
They're all over on LP "proving" that 9/11 was an inside government job and that GWB was in on it:

http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=35022
1,411 posted on 01/22/2004 4:50:37 PM PST by Jim Robinson (I don't belong to no organized political party. I'm a Republycan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1399 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
Well, that was kind of my point. These people say that all the time about Republicans - but who sounds just like the Democrats around here?

They do.

And it's getting old.
1,412 posted on 01/22/2004 4:50:50 PM PST by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet (I love my Green Bay Packers! GO PATRIOTS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1409 | View Replies]

To: LandofLincoln
No, but for the purposes of this discussion, that's as far back as I go.

Let it be noted however, that you're not arguing my post beyond that.
1,413 posted on 01/22/2004 4:51:29 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (The Gift Is To See The Trout.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1389 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
*Snicker!!!!!!!!!!
1,414 posted on 01/22/2004 4:51:44 PM PST by Neets (Dean: "I came in 4th in the Iowa Caucas and all I got was an anxiety attack- YEEEEAAGH")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1411 | View Replies]

To: mhking
Or in English, let's give illegals jobs so that more of them can come it.

I know I'm in the minority on this position, but I actually think he has a good plan. Our nation has thrived by hard working immigrants with a desire to have a better life. Not every mexican is coming here to rape and steal. In fact, before we started tightening our grip on the border it was common for illegals to come over to harvest fruits, get paid and then RETURN to Mexico. But now since we have tightened the border controls (starting in the 80s--I think that's when it started), illegals come and don't return. Not only that since they can't return they bring their families with them. So what used to be one hard working man coming across. Now it's one hard working man, his wife and 4 kids. In order to get across they have to pay some low life to smuggle them across. A smuggler is a smuggler so they bring the drugs too. Unless you want to put up a Berlin-style wall, this problem will continue. A guest worker program allows us to track them while they are here and focus on the bad guys. Would it help if he called it a fine instead of a fee that those already here have to pay?

1,415 posted on 01/22/2004 4:52:17 PM PST by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: LandofLincoln
So, you're a Clinton fan I guess.

What are you doing around these parts?
1,416 posted on 01/22/2004 4:52:29 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (The Gift Is To See The Trout.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1392 | View Replies]

To: novacation
Yeah right.I'm not in the mood for b***h fest and didn't address you in the first place. So bug off.

Translation: "I want to drop an insult in the direction of Bush supporters on this thread, but do not respond to me. I'm not in the mood."

Like I said. Boo-freaking-hoo.

1,417 posted on 01/22/2004 4:53:29 PM PST by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet (I love my Green Bay Packers! GO PATRIOTS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1410 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
These are charges up with I will not put!

Say goodnight, Gracie :-)

1,418 posted on 01/22/2004 4:53:42 PM PST by Ophiucus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1402 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
OMG.
1,419 posted on 01/22/2004 4:54:02 PM PST by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet (I love my Green Bay Packers! GO PATRIOTS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1411 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
I said the tin foilers had moved to another forum LOL..Then there's the "Flt 77 did not hit the Pentagon" theory,conspiracy.
1,420 posted on 01/22/2004 4:54:25 PM PST by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1406 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,381-1,4001,401-1,4201,421-1,440 ... 2,001-2,015 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson