Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

So you think George W. Bush is not a conservative?
SOTU transcript ^ | 1/22/04

Posted on 01/22/2004 7:07:09 AM PST by Wolfstar

ED. NOTE: On Tuesday evening, January 20, 2004, the President of the United States gave one of the most conservative State of the Union addresses in at least a generation. For a SOTU speech, it had a remarkably short spending wish list. Instead, it had passages such as those excerpted below — none of which would have been spoken by a Democrat or liberal (i.e., Leftist), or even a "RINO." Check it out:

[BEGIN EXCERPTS: Bold/underscore emphasis by Wolfstar]

Our greatest responsibility is the active defense of the American people. Twenty-eight months have passed since September 11th, 2001 — over two years without an attack on American soil. And it is tempting to believe that the danger is behind us. That hope is understandable, comforting — and false.

[SNIP]

The once all-powerful ruler of Iraq was found in a hole, and now sits in a prison cell. Of the top 55 officials of the former regime, we have captured or killed 45. Our forces are on the offensive, leading over 1,600 patrols a day and conducting an average of 180 raids a week. We are dealing with these thugs in Iraq, just as surely as we dealt with Saddam Hussein's evil regime.

Because of American leadership and resolve, the world is changing for the better. Last month, the leader of Libya voluntarily pledged to disclose and dismantle all of his regime's weapons of mass destruction programs, including a uranium enrichment project for nuclear weapons.

[SNIP]

Nine months of intense negotiations involving the United States and Great Britain succeeded with Libya, while 12 years of diplomacy with Iraq did not. And one reason is clear: For diplomacy to be effective, words must be credible, and no one can now doubt the word of America.

Many of our troops are listening tonight. And I want you and your families to know: America is proud of you. And my administration, and this Congress, will give you the resources you need to fight and win the war on terror.

I know that some people question if America is really in a war at all. They view terrorism more as a crime, a problem to be solved mainly with law enforcement and indictments. After the World Trade Center was first attacked in 1993, some of the guilty were indicted and tried and convicted, and sent to prison. But the matter was not settled. The terrorists were still training and plotting in other nations, and drawing up more ambitious plans. After the chaos and carnage of September the 11th, it is not enough to serve our enemies with legal papers. The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States, and war is what they got.

[SNIP]

Some critics have said our duties in Iraq must be internationalized. This particular criticism is hard to explain to our partners in Britain, Australia, Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Thailand, Italy, Spain, Poland, Denmark, Hungary, Bulgaria, Ukraine, Romania, the Netherlands — (applause) — Norway, El Salvador, and the 17 other countries that have committed troops to Iraq. As we debate at home, we must never ignore the vital contributions of our international partners, or dismiss their sacrifices.

From the beginning, America has sought international support for our operations in Afghanistan and Iraq, and we have gained much support. There is a difference, however, between leading a coalition of many nations, and submitting to the objections of a few. America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our country.

We also hear doubts that democracy is a realistic goal for the greater Middle East, where freedom is rare. Yet it is mistaken, and condescending, to assume that whole cultures and great religions are incompatible with liberty and self-government. I believe that God has planted in every human heart the desire to live in freedom. And even when that desire is crushed by tyranny for decades, it will rise again.

[SNIP]

In the last three years, adversity has also revealed the fundamental strengths of the American economy. We have come through recession, and terrorist attack, and corporate scandals, and the uncertainties of war. And because you acted to stimulate our economy with tax relief, this economy is strong, and growing stronger.

You have doubled the child tax credit from $500 to $1,000, reduced the marriage penalty, begun to phase out the death tax, reduced taxes on capital gains and stock dividends, cut taxes on small businesses, and you have lowered taxes for every American who pays income taxes.

Americans took those dollars and put them to work, driving this economy forward. The pace of economic growth in the third quarter of 2003 was the fastest in nearly 20 years; new home construction, the highest in almost 20 years; home ownership rates, the highest ever. Manufacturing activity is increasing. Inflation is low. Interest rates are low. Exports are growing. Productivity is high, and jobs are on the rise.

These numbers confirm that the American people are using their money far better than government would have — and you were right to return it.

[SNIP]

We're requiring higher standards [in schools]. We are regularly testing every child on the fundamentals. We are reporting results to parents, and making sure they have better options when schools are not performing.

[SNIP]

We must continue to pursue an aggressive, pro-growth economic agenda. Congress has some unfinished business on the issue of taxes. The tax reductions you passed are set to expire. Unless you act — (applause) — unless you act — unless you act, the unfair tax on marriage will go back up. Unless you act, millions of families will be charged $300 more in federal taxes for every child. Unless you act, small businesses will pay higher taxes. Unless you act, the death tax will eventually come back to life. Unless you act, Americans face a tax increase. What Congress has given, the Congress should not take away. For the sake of job growth, the tax cuts you passed should be permanent.

Our agenda for jobs and growth must help small business owners and employees with relief from needless federal regulation, and protect them from junk and frivolous lawsuits.

Consumers and businesses need reliable supplies of energy to make our economy run — so I urge you to pass legislation to modernize our electricity system, promote conservation, and make America less dependent on foreign sources of energy.

My administration is promoting free and fair trade to open up new markets for America's entrepreneurs and manufacturers and farmers — to create jobs for American workers. Younger workers should have the opportunity to build a nest egg by saving part of their Social Security taxes in a personal retirement account. We should make the Social Security system a source of ownership for the American people.

[SNIP]

In two weeks, I will send you a budget that funds the war, protects the homeland, and meets important domestic needs, while limiting the growth in discretionary spending to less than 4 percent. This will require that Congress focus on priorities, cut wasteful spending, and be wise with the people's money. By doing so, we can cut the deficit in half over the next five years.

Tonight, I also ask you to reform our immigration laws so they reflect our values and benefit our economy.

[SNIP]

I oppose amnesty, because it would encourage further illegal immigration, and unfairly reward those who break our laws. My temporary worker program will preserve the citizenship path for those who respect the law, while bringing millions of hardworking men and women out from the shadows of American life.

[ED. NOTE: The precedent for guest worker programs goes back at least to the Eisenhower administration.]

[SNIP]

In January of 2006, seniors can get prescription drug coverage under Medicare. For a monthly premium of about $35, most seniors who do not have that coverage today can expect to see their drug bills cut roughly in half. Under this reform, senior citizens will be able to keep their Medicare just as it is, or they can choose a Medicare plan that fits them best — just as you, as members of Congress, can choose an insurance plan that meets your needs. And starting this year, millions of Americans will be able to save money tax-free for their medical expenses in a health savings account.

[SNIP]

On the critical issue of health care, our goal is to ensure that Americans can choose and afford private health care coverage that best fits their individual needs.

[SNIP]

Small businesses should be able to band together and negotiate for lower insurance rates, so they can cover more workers with health insurance. I urge you to pass association health plans. I ask you to give lower-income Americans a refundable tax credit that would allow millions to buy their own basic health insurance.

[SNIP]

To protect the doctor-patient relationship, and keep good doctors doing good work, we must eliminate wasteful and frivolous medical lawsuits. And tonight I propose that individuals who buy catastrophic health care coverage, as part of our new health savings accounts, be allowed to deduct 100 percent of the premiums from their taxes.

A government-run health care system is the wrong prescription. By keeping costs under control, expanding access, and helping more Americans afford coverage, we will preserve the system of private medicine that makes America's health care the best in the world.

[SNIP]

One of the worst decisions our children can make is to gamble their lives and futures on drugs. Our government is helping parents confront this problem with aggressive education, treatment, and law enforcement. Drug use in high school has declined by 11 percent over the last two years. Four hundred thousand fewer young people are using illegal drugs than in the year 2001.

[SNIP]

A strong America must also value the institution of marriage. I believe we should respect individuals as we take a principled stand for one of the most fundamental, enduring institutions of our civilization. Congress has already taken a stand on this issue by passing the Defense of Marriage Act, signed in 1996 by President Clinton. That statute protects marriage under federal law as a union of a man and a woman, and declares that one state may not redefine marriage for other states.

Activist judges, however, have begun redefining marriage by court order, without regard for the will of the people and their elected representatives. On an issue of such great consequence, the people's voice must be heard. If judges insist on forcing their arbitrary will upon the people, the only alternative left to the people would be the constitutional process. Our nation must defend the sanctity of marriage.

[SNIP]

It's also important to strengthen our communities by unleashing the compassion of America's religious institutions. Religious charities of every creed are doing some of the most vital work in our country — mentoring children, feeding the hungry, taking the hand of the lonely. Yet government has often denied social service grants and contracts to these groups, just because they have a cross or a Star of David or a crescent on the wall. By executive order, I have opened billions of dollars in grant money to competition that includes faith-based charities. Tonight I ask you to codify this into law, so people of faith can know that the law will never discriminate against them again.

[SNIP]

The momentum of freedom in our world is unmistakable — and it is not carried forward by our power alone. We can trust in that greater power who guides the unfolding of the years. And in all that is to come, we can know that His purposes are just and true.

[END EXCERPTS]


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; bushamnesty; sotu
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,061-1,0801,081-1,1001,101-1,120 ... 2,001-2,015 next last
To: Protagoras
It's amazing how you folks can continue to address things I never disputed as a substitute for refuting the things I did dispute.

More nonsensical BS...

1. You stated that the 91% Republican support figure was a fairy tale because it only covered two issues.

2. You stated the article was written by a Bush apologist.

3. You stated: "Never mind the other four or five issues which, if asked by an honest pollster, might show a different result."

I merely gave you a figure that covered the whole range of issues by someone that is considered credible and honest in his line of work. And even though Zogby's numbers normally lean to the left side of the spectrum, he states that Bush still enjoys an 83% rating with Republicans. In the real world, that figure is probably closer to 85-90%. And if you figure in the margin of error of +/- 3%, the 91% figure is not unrealistic. So...WTF are you griping at me for?

1,081 posted on 01/22/2004 12:55:09 PM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 901 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
It may be entertainment to you, but to most of us, it's not.

LOL! Tell the doorman I said to refund your cover charge....

1,082 posted on 01/22/2004 12:55:13 PM PST by Nanodik (Libertarian, Ex-Canadian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1071 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Throwing the election to the Democrats.

Oh, you mean for stating one's opinion that Bush is not the best candidate? That's fine with me pal. If a website ironically called "Free Republic" wants to stifle free speech, that's fine with me. But the threat doesn't faze me in the least - I couldn't care less. There are many forums. I would say good riddance - but I don't think that's the case.

Tell you what...to test your statement...why don't you go to Jim Robinson and tell him that I am actively opposing Bush on this website. And we'll see what happens.

In the meantime, try to argue the issues...if you can.

1,083 posted on 01/22/2004 12:55:37 PM PST by exmarine ( sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1072 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
I finally was able to reach someone I know at my senator's office.. he told me that BUSH INTENDS TO PUT THE IMMIGRATION FIASCO THROUGH AS AN EXECUTIVE ORDER!!!

What Senator's office said that????

1,084 posted on 01/22/2004 12:55:49 PM PST by Mo1 (Join the dollar a day crowd now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1078 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
ABSOLUTLY RIGHT!!!!!!!!!
1,085 posted on 01/22/2004 12:57:13 PM PST by grafic11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: All

I have to keep using this cartoon because it sums the argument up soooo nicely.

1,086 posted on 01/22/2004 12:57:17 PM PST by Porterville (Level 9 -Traitors against God, country, family, and benefactors lament their sins in this frigid pit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1084 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Zipporah apparently hails from Kentucky.
1,087 posted on 01/22/2004 12:57:46 PM PST by Bikers4Bush (Constitution party here I come. Write in Tancredo in 04'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1084 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
In other words, you can pick between two. They are both Republicans.
1,088 posted on 01/22/2004 12:59:18 PM PST by Bikers4Bush (Constitution party here I come. Write in Tancredo in 04'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1084 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
I don't care who said it; it will never happen.
1,089 posted on 01/22/2004 12:59:53 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1078 | View Replies]

To: DollyCali
Eeeeeeeyyyyyyyyuuuuuuu!!!

Now I know what all these third party guys look like.
1,090 posted on 01/22/2004 1:00:01 PM PST by Columbine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1005 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
My point was that at least I knew what to expect from clinton

And liked it, considering your Bush animus.

I will wait for your canned answer, "fear mongering" or what not.

1,091 posted on 01/22/2004 1:00:40 PM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1019 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
Zipporah apparently hails from Kentucky.

I realized that .. but which Senator's aid would go on record to stay that?

1,092 posted on 01/22/2004 1:00:58 PM PST by Mo1 (Join the dollar a day crowd now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1087 | View Replies]

To: bray
"How do you really have agriculture w/o migrant Mexicans?? "

I'm sure right after the civil war people wondered how we'd have cotton without slaves too. That seemed to have been worked out though eventually and the farmers could work it out now too.
1,093 posted on 01/22/2004 1:01:54 PM PST by honeygrl (If you think the Constitution Party is such a joke, then why do you seem so afraid of it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
I finally was able to reach someone I know at my senator's office.. he told me that BUSH INTENDS TO PUT THE IMMIGRATION FIASCO THROUGH AS AN EXECUTIVE ORDER!!!

If that is true, then it is Congress' solemn duty to rescind that EO immediately, and they have that power. This is an end around the people - this is rule by decree. I hope you are wrong.

1,094 posted on 01/22/2004 1:02:01 PM PST by exmarine ( sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1078 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
it will never happen

True

1,095 posted on 01/22/2004 1:02:16 PM PST by Mo1 (Join the dollar a day crowd now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1089 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter
You stated that the 91% Republican support figure was a fairy tale because it only covered two issues.

I never said that. It's pitiful that you have to resort to making things up because you can't refute what I did say.

For the record, and for those of you who are comprehension challenged, I said that it was a fairy tale that 91% of Republicans supported his policies, period.

another poster said 91 % of republicans supported his policies, with no qualifiers. Just a blanket statement. It was, and is, a fairy tale. Belive what you want, but don't lie about my position.

1,096 posted on 01/22/2004 1:02:27 PM PST by Protagoras (When they asked me what I thought of freedom in America,,, I said I thought it would be a good idea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1081 | View Replies]

To: Dane
You know what to expect from your own arse too does that mean you like it?

Thanks for playing.
1,097 posted on 01/22/2004 1:02:29 PM PST by Bikers4Bush (Constitution party here I come. Write in Tancredo in 04'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1091 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Like I said. I guess we'll see.
1,098 posted on 01/22/2004 1:02:55 PM PST by Bikers4Bush (Constitution party here I come. Write in Tancredo in 04'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1089 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
There are many who just left because the election was over.Some tin foilers are discussing the Pentagon being struck by a smaller plane on other forums(LOL).Some have been banned and reinstated.Some said kool aid drinkers too many times.Some have become the anti freepers,anti JR,group.
1,099 posted on 01/22/2004 1:03:27 PM PST by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1044 | View Replies]

To: RiflemanSharpe
The bigger killer is angering your base the way GWB is doing

He is angering you, not the base as has been proven. You are not the base.

Hell you would be angry at Bush if he changed the part in his hair, IMO.

1,100 posted on 01/22/2004 1:03:43 PM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1047 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,061-1,0801,081-1,1001,101-1,120 ... 2,001-2,015 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson