Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All
Does anyone else think that one of tonight's biggest losers (in addition to the obvious, Gephardt and Dean) might have been Wesley Clark?

Skipping Iowa always seemed a questionable strategy to me. Now, Clark might be lost in the New Hampshire shuffle as a Kerry-Dean death match ensues. And Edwards's unexpectedly strong showing throws a wrench into Clark's Southern strategy. At least, that's the way I see it...

1,895 posted on 01/19/2004 7:24:24 PM PST by southernnorthcarolina (How 'bout those CAROLINA PANTHERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: southernnorthcarolina
Ya, Clark was a big loser, but he was never really in the running anyway. I don't care what the polls suggested. The press would have eaten him alive if he really gained traction.
1,904 posted on 01/19/2004 7:25:47 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1895 | View Replies ]

To: southernnorthcarolina
Well, it might help Clark a little to know where to position himself in NH judging from the results in Iowa. Clark's a Clintonite, so switching his political position to fit what he needs is acceptable strategy for him. When is NH?
1,934 posted on 01/19/2004 7:30:32 PM PST by Sofa King (-I am Sofa King- tired of liberal BS! http://www.angelfire.com/art2/sofaking/index.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1895 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson