Skip to comments.
23 years and counting: H-P's calculator, a relic by today's standards, is still selling strong
Austin American Statesman ^
| January 19, 2004
| Bob Keefe
Posted on 01/19/2004 8:49:58 AM PST by kennedy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
To: kennedy
You have geeks coming out of the woodwork here. LOL
41
posted on
01/19/2004 9:42:34 AM PST
by
Professional Engineer
(Ya' mean there are other kinds of fish besides Trout?)
To: Jack Black
To: Jack Black
I have a HP-16C which does hexadecimal. I never saw anything to replace it, but then, I never needed a replacement.
I also have an earlier HP-25 model which I once programmed for base conversions.
43
posted on
01/19/2004 9:45:58 AM PST
by
SteveH
To: SteveH
the 48 will do the base conversions. It will also allow numbers to be input in other bases. Math functions work on whatever the current base is set to.
Made life so much easier in college.
44
posted on
01/19/2004 9:49:25 AM PST
by
Professional Engineer
(Ya' mean there are other kinds of fish besides Trout?)
To: kennedy
I recently crushed 12-C number three and went into a panick when an Office Depot clerk told me they had been discontinued. Fortunately, Office Max hadn't heard the news. ;)
To: kennedy
Bought my first HP12c in January, 1982 while working on my MBA, for access to financial functions beyond the reach of my Texas Instruments calculator. What a great device. And the RPN - not only is it more functional, it enhances my prestige by intmidating my boss. You can't put a price tag on that.
46
posted on
01/19/2004 9:58:49 AM PST
by
Romulus
(Nothing really good ever happened after 1789.)
To: kennedy
True. I haven't found anything else that compares with my HP 27S either. The solver equations in the manuals (got 'em all) is well worth the price of the calculator.
To: tallhappy
Reverse Polish Notation -- the greatest. I agree...can't use TI (uses A.O.S. - alg. op. sys.) H-P s' are the Best...to bad they aren't as widespread today...cheaper, less capable calculators Dominate the market. I've got a H-P 49G (and 48GX).
48
posted on
01/19/2004 10:03:01 AM PST
by
skinkinthegrass
(Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :)
To: Nick Danger
Dang. Looks like my old Rockwell.
Staring at my Palm Vx and wondering why people still use calculators.
49
posted on
01/19/2004 10:03:20 AM PST
by
AppyPappy
(If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
To: toast
Me too... one of the solar credit card sized ones, that ONLY works if there is sunlight or strong interior lighting. Uses some pressure sensitive pads for the keys and is more or less indestructible.
I also have a TI Programmer whose battery failed a long time ago but included the connector for a regular 9v battery. Have been using it this way for about 18 years to do HEX & occasionally OCTAL (as well as just a regular 4 function calculator of course). Absolutely amazing these early calculators.
When I went to japan 10 years ago I saw an 8 pack of...
toilet paper
with a simple taiwanese four function calculator included in the package as a bonus (!!!)
50
posted on
01/19/2004 10:10:09 AM PST
by
chilepepper
(The map is not the territory -- Alfred Korzybski)
To: avg_freeper; husky ed
My 48g is no slower than i can input!
Funny, but i find that similar to people who can't type complaining their computer is too slow. Then again, that is only using the basic functions. I forgot long ago how to do the heavy math, as i don't need it for my work.
51
posted on
01/19/2004 10:15:19 AM PST
by
Fierce Allegiance
(Just hanging around waiting until next years Dakar rally.)
To: Doohickey
I have a TI-35 puchased when I was in Navy tech school in 1984. Still the most reliable, feature-rich, easy to use non-programmable calculator I've ever owned.Ditto. I have had a TI-35 since elementary school; first the battery-operated version, and then when I lost that about a year later, the solar-powered version, which is still going strong to this day, though I tend to rely more on the calculator function in my Pilot these days (despite being annoyed that its firmware doesn't have the scientific functions of its predecessor).
To: TruthShallSetYouFree
You are confusing imaginary and fantasy.
53
posted on
01/19/2004 11:03:35 AM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: kennedy
I've never replaced the 12C I bought in the early 80s. I have, otoh, bought a couple during the spans when I thought I'd lost it.
To: kennedy
Have my 12C from around the same time. Best investment I ever made. Takes up very little space and works like a charm.
Pray for W and Our Brave Troops
55
posted on
01/19/2004 11:05:42 AM PST
by
bray
(The Wicked Witch of NY and Her 9 Flying Monkeys are In Flames!)
To: tallhappy
Reverse Polish Notation -- the greatest. Gotta agree.
I still use my HP-41CX, which I went out and bought immediately after using a "regular" calculator to crunch numbers from a wind tunnel lab. It cost $300 in 1983, and I've never once regretted the expense.
56
posted on
01/19/2004 11:07:52 AM PST
by
r9etb
To: Cboldt
There are quite a few out there, last I looked. Under linux, for example, just do "xcalc -rpn"Excellent tip! I was talking with a co-worker just this past friday about RPN calculators and did a few searches looking for a good clone of the hp-12c. Xcalc aint pretty, but it's already there, and it works!
It is an amazing testament to the folks who engineered the 12c that the thing is still being sold, virtually unchanged after all these years. Of course, it was developed back when Hewlett and Packard were still there, and the company was run mostly my engineers. I've got an old "test and measurement" catalog from HP that has some amazing things in it. I always wanted an atomic clock of my very own.
An interesting sidebar about that atomic clock ($16,000)... In the notes on the page, it said it must be shipped overland to ensure accuracy of the clock as it was set at the factory, and the difference in the distance from the gravitational center of the earth experienced on an airplane would cause it to drift from "true" time by a measureable (though miniscule) amount during the flight.
57
posted on
01/19/2004 11:14:45 AM PST
by
zeugma
(The Great Experiment is over.)
To: Jack Black
10C, 11C, 15C, 12C, 16C
Can't remember what all the different models were. IIRC, 10, 11 & 15 are engineering; 12 is financial; and 16 is boolean/hex/computer programmer.
58
posted on
01/19/2004 11:22:57 AM PST
by
Cboldt
To: zeugma
I've got an old "test and measurement" catalog from HP that has some amazing things in it. Old Leeds & Northrup catalogs are pretty cool, too.
59
posted on
01/19/2004 11:27:11 AM PST
by
Cboldt
To: kennedy
Wasn't the first HP introduced in about 1974 or '75? Seems I recall a mining engineer student with a HP 30 (?) that had the whole engineering and science departments in an up-roar. I recall them being forbiden during exams. I do remember not being able to afford one.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson