Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UCSC scientist jarred by Hubble’s demise
Santa Cruz (CA) Sentinel ^ | January 18, 2004 | SHANNA MCCORD

Posted on 01/19/2004 5:09:25 AM PST by The Other Harry

January 18, 2004

UCSC scientist jarred by Hubble’s demise

By SHANNA MCCORD
Sentinel Staff Writer

SANTA CRUZ — UC Santa Cruz astronomy professor Sandra Faber spent the sunny Saturday afternoon in her university office making a mad dash against time.

After hearing Friday that the National Aeronautics and Space Administration would no longer be servicing the Hubble Space Telescope, Faber felt the need to make her latest proposal for using the telescope as compelling as possible. This will most likely be her last chance to apply to do research through the revolutionary spacecraft.

Without additional repairs to the Hubble, scientists expect the floating telescope to be useless by 2007 or 2008.

Faber — renowned in the world of science for her vast knowledge of all things related to space, galaxies, stars and black holes — was a member of the instrument team that discovered a focusing flaw in the Hubble telescope soon after its launch in 1990.

Since then, corrections and repairs through periodic service missions have given the telescope an ability to beam photos of previously unseen galaxies back to Earth in near perfection, she said.

"It’s a very powerful tool to studying the history of history," Faber said.

Now competing with about 1,000 scientists for the remaining research time on the Hubble, she considers the opportunity to be "the most precious time in the astronomical world."

The deadline for submitting proposals is Friday.

John Grunsfeld, NASA’s chief scientist, said NASA administrator Sean O’Keefe made the decision to cancel the fifth space shuttle service mission to the Hubble when it became evident there was not enough time for additional repairs before the shuttle is retired.

The decision, said Grunsfeld, was influenced by President Bush’s latest space initiative, which calls for NASA to develop the shuttle and equipment for voyages to the moon and eventually to Mars.

Most of the shuttle’s remaining flights are to be used to complete construction of the International Space Station, something Faber calls "complete and utter misuse of space."

She also deplores the idea of human space travel and said it’s "utterly worthless."

For now, Faber’s focus is grabbing the attention of the panel of scientists judging the Hubble proposals. Once that’s complete, she’ll move toward making a pitch to Congress about the importance of the telescope and why it should be saved.

The Associated Press contributed to this story.

Contact Shanna McCord at smccord@santacruzsentinel.com.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: hubble; nasa; space; ucsc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

1 posted on 01/19/2004 5:09:25 AM PST by The Other Harry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: The Other Harry
She also deplores the idea of human space travel and said it’s "utterly worthless."

Why is it that most career academics are so unimaginative?

2 posted on 01/19/2004 5:12:38 AM PST by O.C. - Old Cracker (When the cracker gets old, you wind up with Old Cracker. - O.C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Other Harry
Most of the shuttle’s remaining flights are to be used to complete construction of the International Space Station, something Faber calls "complete and utter misuse of space."

She also deplores the idea of human space travel and said it’s "utterly worthless."

Some facts missing from the article:

1. What is the design life of the Hubble?
2. Are there replacements in the the pipeline?
3. What is the cost for servicing a the Hubble (especially past it's design life)?
4. Is UC Santa Cruz astronomy professor Sandra Faber an idiot?

3 posted on 01/19/2004 5:15:27 AM PST by 2banana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: O.C. - Old Cracker
She also deplores the idea of human space travel and said it’s "utterly worthless."

That will be a hard sell on her part once we discover the planet of "Hot Orion Slave Girls In Heat".

KIRK:"Spock, how?!?..."

SPOCK:"Captain, it's a well known fact that this environmental suit is the only known protection to the 'Orion Clap' ".

4 posted on 01/19/2004 5:17:58 AM PST by Caipirabob (Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: O.C. - Old Cracker
Faber — renowned in the world of science for her vast knowledge of all things related to space, galaxies, stars and black holes — was a member of the instrument team that discovered a focusing flaw in the Hubble telescope soon after its launch in 1990.

Well at least around the faculty lounge. I am not sure that Santa Cruz ever had imaginative Science. We used to call is "Surfer U." The James Webb Space Telescope is were it is at. If she has such a hot project she should apply for time at Keck.

5 posted on 01/19/2004 5:18:25 AM PST by CasearianDaoist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Other Harry
It figures - it's the only one (orbital telescope) we have, so they'll let it die without replacing it with anything. Kinda like they did with Skylab.

Many believed that they'd let the shuttles 'die' too (i.e. not replace them with anything comparable but more efficient) - by now (especially after two failures) you'd think they'd at least have orbited those new designs they've been playing with these many years.

IMO: the space station would've been better only under US construction (and on schedule too) and not as elaborate (from what I read of their dreams for it).

As for manned flight: to Mars would be the most @$$headed thing they could do.

What happened NASA? The only thing you're being known for is dropping the ball (when it comes to infrastructure)!
6 posted on 01/19/2004 5:21:32 AM PST by solitas (sleep well, gentle reader; but remember there ARE such things...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CasearianDaoist
Shame the Hubble is going away, though. You'd think they could put something together with a Soyuz-based EVA and a rendezvous with a Progress equipment/supply vessel. As long as Hubble isn't rotating, and it isn't, they should be able to work on it even without grappler arms.

Comment, anyone?

7 posted on 01/19/2004 5:26:47 AM PST by lentulusgracchus (Et praeterea caeterum censeo, delenda est Carthago. -- M. Porcius Cato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus

When Social Security and Medicare start running out of money in about 15 yrs., the whole space program will be discontinued and all these scientists better know how to do something else. The name of the game is "Votes", and the main focus of every politician will be to keep these broken systems afloat, even if everything else must go.
8 posted on 01/19/2004 5:32:54 AM PST by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CasearianDaoist
If she has such a hot project she should apply for time at Keck.

She probably has it. IIRC, Keck is operated jointly by UCSC and Univ. of Hawaii. For all its shortcomings, UCSC does have a serious astronomy deptarment.

9 posted on 01/19/2004 5:35:01 AM PST by The Other Harry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: solitas
" As for manned flight: to Mars would be the most @$$headed thing they could do. "

We need a refueling station on Mars to save us from the Borg. And on Babylon 5 the Mars colony saved us from a despotic regime back on Earth trying to enslave the Galaxy.

10 posted on 01/19/2004 5:40:14 AM PST by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib
Yes, I posted to another thread that (short form) I suspect that the real announcement the other day was that the shuttle and the ISS are to be wound down as the US pulls out of ISS obligations gradually, and the rest was theater and "kicking the can down the road" for some other president to shoulder the burden of telling the kids that Santa's dead and there ain't gonna be no more NASA, except as a robotic-vehicle assembly and launch area.

We could wind up with a smaller space program than Japan's. God knows that, as you say, enough people are after the money -- some of them live on Park Avenue, too. Where everyone has a direct line to Karl Rove.

11 posted on 01/19/2004 5:43:59 AM PST by lentulusgracchus (Et praeterea caeterum censeo, delenda est Carthago. -- M. Porcius Cato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: The Other Harry
She also deplores the idea of human space travel and said it’s "utterly worthless."

I agree. Space travel is a romantic idea, but is practically worthless.

12 posted on 01/19/2004 5:46:40 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: solitas
>>...What happened NASA?...<<

NASA's lost it's nerve. At least the bureaucrats have.

The workers, engineers, scientists and astronauts are willing to fly but the honchos are afraid of another accident "on their watch". (bad for careers)

IMHO, there's no reason to fly the shuttles at all if they're not doing "Hubble type" missions. That's the reason the darn things were built.

Fix the foam and fly!

13 posted on 01/19/2004 5:48:38 AM PST by FReepaholic (Never Forget: www.september-11-videos.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: elfman2
We need a refueling station on Mars to save us from the Borg.

That's the best explaination I have heard so far.

14 posted on 01/19/2004 5:49:33 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: solitas
They are replacing it with the James Webb Space Telescope. We have the largest and best thought out Astronomy Science and Technology in history. For most intents and purposes Hubble is now obsolete. The need in space instruments is in totally different spectra than the ones that Hubble's prime mission is designed around. Keck new adaptive optics and its interferometer will come on line long before Hubble goes down. Cal Tech's CELT project (a 30 meter adaptive optics Telescope miught make it to first light in that time frame too. They are not abandoning anything, they are retireing an instrument three year head of its service live (and not its original service life.) The new Spritzer Infrared Space Telescope and the ESA's Hershel Infrared Space Telescope due up in 07 (if they make it on time) will be where the action is at the close of this decade; The HST has pretty much run its course.

Modern astronomy facilities come in four varieties: survey instruments (usually land based), Large land based instruments that more closely examine results of surveys; Space Based Telescopes and radio telescopes. All of these are used together.

The current foundations for the US are the Gemini Telescopes (two 8 or 8.5 Telescopes in both Hemispheres) for survey work, The HST for visual wavelengths and the Spritzer for IR, Keck for large land based scopes that are both visual range and IR, and the VLA and Arecebo for RF. Over the next decade or so they will transfer to using a variety of land based scopes for survey work, The James Webb Space Telescope (an 8 meter infrared space based telescope the most amazing telescope in history if all goes well) for space, the CELT for Earth based refined exploration and the ALMA project (a joint US ESO/EU project that is the largest RF array in history.) Besides that there are other spaced based instruments in other spectra to replace ones like Chandra.

I suggest that before you make smug little comments like

It figures - it's the only one (orbital telescope) we have, so they'll let it die without replacing it with anything.

that you do your homework. It is just an insult to some very serious people doing some very serious planning and some of the most brilliant work in the history of the field.

Not only is Bush's plan quite good, but this cancellation has little to do with it. It is about new safety measure mandated by congress.

To somehow imply that something so far reaching, expensive and as important as Astronomy is somehow being handled in a shortsighted or amateurish way is to evince an ignorance of current national science policies or frameworks, and a contempt for the people that have planned, built and daily use the greatest intellectual and physical science infrastructure the world has ever seen.

15 posted on 01/19/2004 5:58:28 AM PST by CasearianDaoist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
I agree. Space travel is a romantic idea, but is practically worthless.

I agree too. In terms of valuable information about the comos, all the manned missions combined don't hold a candle to what Hubble has yielded.

16 posted on 01/19/2004 5:59:23 AM PST by The Other Harry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: solitas
What happened NASA?

Well, Clinton mined NASA's budget for $$$ for his headline-oriented mini-initiatives, and Dubya is stripping it out for Homeland Security missions, redirecting shuttle resources and missions to Tom Ridge. There was a press release last April or so, after the new 2004 budget came out, in which there was a carve-out from the shuttle program funds for Homeland Security, missions to be run by IIRC the Air Force.

So everyone is carving NASA's budget for money to do other things, because a) there's a security need and beyond that, b) fresh money is the kind from which all political vig flows. And Bush plays the game, too -- except I think he wants to as much of it as possible in the form of tax cuts to his real constituency, They Who Must Be Obeyed, in the financial community.

17 posted on 01/19/2004 6:04:35 AM PST by lentulusgracchus (Et praeterea caeterum censeo, delenda est Carthago. -- M. Porcius Cato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: The Other Harry
UCSC has a pretty good astro department. My undergraduate advisor and my graduate advisor both either worked there, or graduated from there. As someone already noted, they have a part time share at Keck. That's pretty big time.

There's two problems here. One is that JWST isn't scheduled for launch until 2011. The other is that the fourth servicing mission that was cancelled is what was planned to keep HST alive until 2010 at the latest, otherwise, the probable death date of the current crop of important electronics will be 2006-2008. The other problem is that there has already been about $20 million of development of current electronics for SM4 that will go for naught now.

So there will be a 3-5 year gap with no spaceborne optical platform, and no platform with near ultraviolet observational capabilities.

Now, the good thing is that from what I've read is that the money that would have gone to SM4 will be dedicated to getting JWST out the door on time, instead of to the Mars Project, nor does the current NASA administration plan on cutting the SMEX and MIDEX programs to pay for a Moon or Mars mission. That is a good thing. I don't think we should eviscerate our space research program for this.

18 posted on 01/19/2004 6:04:44 AM PST by ThinkPlease (Fortune Favors the Bold!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Physicist; RadioAstronomer; edwin hubble
Ping for your attention.
19 posted on 01/19/2004 6:06:05 AM PST by ThinkPlease (Fortune Favors the Bold!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus
The Soyuz cannot do it. This is really irritating me. Do you not think they would have thought this out. That is an extremely demanding mission, a very high orbit and a large payload. The HST is not really that important to the future of astronomy. They would be better off giving that money to Cal Tech to work on the CELT project.

There are a lot of people on this site being very critical of Bush's plan, NASA and the Hubble decision that do not seem to know much about any of it.

Let hand science and technology over the the Democrats - boy they sure did a good job the last time around.

20 posted on 01/19/2004 6:06:52 AM PST by CasearianDaoist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson