Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'No blister agent' in Iraq shells
BBC Breaking News ^ | January 18, 2004 | BBC News

Posted on 01/18/2004 7:03:58 AM PST by Right_Handed_Writer

Three dozen mortar shells uncovered in Iraq earlier this month had no chemical agents, the Danish army says. It is not clear why initial tests first showed they could contain blister gas, the Danish army said in a statement carried by the AP news agency.

The 36 shells were found in southern Iraq buried among building equipment, even though they appeared to have been abandoned for at least 10 years.

The US-UK coalition launched the war in Iraq over arms banned by the UN.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chemicalweapons; danishtroops; iraq; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
One of these times....
1 posted on 01/18/2004 7:03:58 AM PST by Right_Handed_Writer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Right_Handed_Writer
I'm beginning to think, since many of these "findings" are made by foreign troops, that field tests are negative to begin with, and that our "allies" are trying to make the US look bad.

The assumption that the WMDs are currently in Syria should be pushed more and investigated. Question is, how did that happen under our noses?

If the Kay report ends up short of something sensational, the impact on the overall war on terror will be very disastrous. Is the intelligence inept? There is so much at stake here. We really need satellite photos of suspicious movements from Iraq to Syria.

2 posted on 01/18/2004 7:12:00 AM PST by aristotleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Right_Handed_Writer
"It is not clear why initial tests first showed..."

This has happened too many times for mere coincidence. From the first days of the war to this latest episode.

WTF is going on?

3 posted on 01/18/2004 7:15:39 AM PST by IoCaster ("That to live by one man's will became the cause of all men's misery." - Richard Hooker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Right_Handed_Writer
Uhhh...they were filled with liquid....

Other than WMD, no other field artillery rounds are filled with liquid other than chemical warheads....

Unless Saddam was to unleash the dreaded "Evian" warhead....

The report either initial or subsequent must be disinformation.

NeverGore
4 posted on 01/18/2004 7:18:23 AM PST by nevergore (“Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Right_Handed_Writer
Well . . . what was in them?
5 posted on 01/18/2004 7:18:42 AM PST by trebb (Ain't God good . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IoCaster
WTF is going on?

Isn't it obvious by now WTF is going on?

6 posted on 01/18/2004 7:19:07 AM PST by MosesKnows
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: IoCaster
Field tests are designed to lean toward indicating a positive. This is for the sake of the soldiers in the field as it is better to lean in the direction of precaution. As for what was in those shells...they were most likely either smoke or willy pete rounds. The chemicals can liquify over time.
7 posted on 01/18/2004 7:22:43 AM PST by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Right_Handed_Writer
Really a non issue, IMO.

A few shells with old blistering agents is hardly the threat to this country that GWB painted before the war.

How could we know where and what Saddam had before the war, with enough precision for Powell to be specific on those matters at the UN, and then loose them all?

If we had the ability to find and identify them then, how could we not have that same ability, at all, thereafter?
8 posted on 01/18/2004 7:22:44 AM PST by RJCogburn ("Hooray for the man from Texas!"........Mattie Ross of near Dardenelle in Yell County)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Right_Handed_Writer
This seem a bit suspicious to me. I'm starting to wonder if this is the result of an anti-war faction in the foreign troops. IIRC, it wasn't just 'initial tests' that showed a blistering agent.
9 posted on 01/18/2004 7:26:02 AM PST by Sofa King (-I am Sofa King- tired of liberal BS! http://www.angelfire.com/art2/sofaking/index.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nevergore
"Other than WMD, no other field artillery rounds are filled with liquid other than chemical warheads...."

Probably insecticide. ; >)

10 posted on 01/18/2004 7:26:29 AM PST by Ben Hecks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Right_Handed_Writer
I'm wondering WHY they are insisting on hiding these discoveries.

I can see not letting out discoveries of germ warfare so they won;t scare the ignorant people of the world, but it has been a known fact that iraq had the berve gas, mustard gas, etc so it does no harm in releasing those discoveries.

Unless.....

was this a DIS-associated Press (or reuters) release?
11 posted on 01/18/2004 7:27:01 AM PST by steplock (www.FOCUS.GOHOTSPRINGS.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IoCaster
This has happened too many times for mere coincidence. From the first days of the war to this latest episode. WTF is going on?

Orwell called it prolefeed.

12 posted on 01/18/2004 7:27:49 AM PST by steve50 ("There is Tranquility in Ignorance, but Servitude is its Partner.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Right_Handed_Writer
THe ORIGINAL story back on 15 Jan 2004 was a DIS-Associated press release!

I thought it had that putrid smell about it!

"Tests of Iraq mortar shells find no blister agent"
By Matthew Rosenberg
The Associated Press
January 15, 2004
13 posted on 01/18/2004 7:30:11 AM PST by steplock (www.FOCUS.GOHOTSPRINGS.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trebb; nevergore
"unleash the dreaded "Evian" warhead...."

Oh My STARS AND GARTERS!   The unbiased BBC has proven once and for all that the Americans are hot-headed cowboys and that Blair is a poodle.   (Shouldn't this be posted under 'breaking news'?)

/sarcasm

It seems like everyday I'm amazed all over again at how so many actually believe the garbage coming out of the BBC, the NYT, and of course that famous FOX competitor "ABCNNBCBS".  Doesn't anyone care about the violations of the UN resolutions?  How Iraqi yellow-cake in Amsterdam?

Sheesh!

14 posted on 01/18/2004 7:35:38 AM PST by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: IoCaster
Good question. Here are some more:

1. Why would something that's totally innocent be so carefully hidden?

2. If there were no chemicals in the shells, why were they constructed to hold them? What would be the point, if not to deliver chemicals?

3. What was the liquid?

4. What tripped the alarms on the initial tests? Are our tests so shoddy that even water will test positive for chemicals?

15 posted on 01/18/2004 7:39:10 AM PST by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: trebb
Well . . . what was in them?

They were "clean up shells" that are commonly used after a battle to clean up a messy battlefield. They were probably filled with something like this:


16 posted on 01/18/2004 7:40:05 AM PST by e_engineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nevergore
Uhhh...they were filled with liquid.... <

Close-up cross-section of Queen Anne Shell

17 posted on 01/18/2004 7:45:00 AM PST by freedumb2003 (Okay, who stole their tin foil hats? I demand they return them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Right_Handed_Writer
So apparently this one ended up being nothing either. But I find it interesting they went to all the trouble to bury them, like they buried the jets, trucks, etc. The regime found all the time in the world to bury that stuff, I believe some WMD may still be buried in Iraq. I think the case that Iraq shipped much of its WMD to Syria is very credible. The Israeli intel was warning us before the war, during the last case for 'inspections' that they wouldn't find any because Iraq was shipping to Syria. Iraq had so much warning before us going to war with them that it is apparent they planned for this in an attempt to malign the US in regards to Iraq and WMD. What is the deal with our spy satellites? I've read that Russia, France, etc. gave Iraq the times when our satellites would be overhead. The regime and its thugs were clever in their hiding and denials of these WMD, but it defies logic when they had chemical suits at the ready, wouldn't allow UN inspections, go to the trouble to bury weaponry, destroyed documents, scrub down trailers, kill scientists, etc. that something is going on and I hope they figure it out. The US erred in allowing Russia, France and the rest of that regime's allies in holding us up in taking action therefore allowing Iraq time to create this situation with the WMD.
18 posted on 01/18/2004 7:55:05 AM PST by bushfamfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IoCaster
WTF is going on?

Initial field tests are notoriously inaccurate.

19 posted on 01/18/2004 7:58:29 AM PST by TankerKC (...and, don't flash at me or I'll never move over!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
1. Why would something that's totally innocent be so carefully hidden?

Hidden or disposed of? We have a problem in the US in finding (and trying to destroy) old stuff we buried long ago to dispose of it.

If there were no chemicals in the shells, why were they constructed to hold them? What would be the point, if not to deliver chemicals?

These were obviously left over from the Iran war. No one has ever suggested that they didn't have this stuff in the distant past. Again, was this just a conveint method of disposal? For that matter, were these just old training rounds from the Iran war?

20 posted on 01/18/2004 8:00:29 AM PST by templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson