[FairOpinion]

"Perhaps if some were deported while seeking benefits,"

==

I am all for that -- problem is the US courts, stuffed with liberals, who overturn any sensible measures voters try to pass, such as Prop. 187.

Some are trying to resurrect a different version of it.

[kingu]

I am all for that -- problem is the US courts, stuffed with liberals, who overturn any sensible measures voters try to pass, such as Prop. 187.

The problem with 187 type plans (and yes, they've cleaned up a lot of the errors in the new system) is that why should California have to pass this law, and what will be the results of it?

Let's say we actually pass an effective law here. The illegals will scatter across the country, doubling in size everywhere. Some state will feel sorry and an idiot RAT will stand up and say they'll give illegals safe harbor.

These things need to be established at the national level to apply to every state, and the states forced to follow them, because otherwise, we just move the illegal population.

[Marak]

[Some are trying to resurrect a different version of it.]

I hope they are successful. America cannot afford to care for the entire world. I sure wish their own countries would work to make their homelands a better place to live.