[kingu]

I am all for that -- problem is the US courts, stuffed with liberals, who overturn any sensible measures voters try to pass, such as Prop. 187.

The problem with 187 type plans (and yes, they've cleaned up a lot of the errors in the new system) is that why should California have to pass this law, and what will be the results of it?

Let's say we actually pass an effective law here. The illegals will scatter across the country, doubling in size everywhere. Some state will feel sorry and an idiot RAT will stand up and say they'll give illegals safe harbor.

These things need to be established at the national level to apply to every state, and the states forced to follow them, because otherwise, we just move the illegal population.

[FairOpinion]

"These things need to be established at the national level to apply to every state, "

==

I am all for that -- but where is the US Congress on this?

Do you think all those bleeding heart Dems would vote for a law to withhold welfare from illegal aliens?

We would have to elect a lot more Republicans to do that.