Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Co-responsibility for public policy (Archbishop Hughes' on pro-abortion "Cathoics" & Communion)
Clarion Herald ^ | January 14, 2004 | ARCHBISHOP ALFRED C. HUGHES

Posted on 01/17/2004 2:55:01 PM PST by cpforlife.org

Clarion Herald logo Co-responsibility for public policy New Orleans
January 14, 2004

By ARCHBISHOP ALFRED C. HUGHES


The Catechism of the Catholic Church makes clear that all Catholics have a personal responsibility to participate in promoting the common good in accordance with their vocation in life. Those holding public office have a special responsibility. The goal of this participation is to help shape a public policy that is in conformity as much as possible with the law rooted in our nature that governs us all, no matter what our religious belief. Thus, they are called to try to ensure that the laws that govern us protect human life, respect the human person, preserve the unique nature of marriage, support family, ensure the safety of children, guarantee religious freedom and make it possible for all citizens to share in the conditions that are necessary for human living.

But Catholics also experience a certain freedom in developing legislation that is, as much as possible, in conformity with the natural law. There can be different strategies for realizing fundamental values. There are going to be differences in the application of the basic principles of political theory. Sometimes the technical complexity of issues makes diverse human judgments inevitable.

What, then, is the responsibility of Catholic public officials to translate their moral convictions on the life issues into public policy? Let us first address those issues that admit of no exceptions: abortion, physician-assisted suicide, homicide, the destruction of human embryos in artificial fertilization, stem cell research and cloning. In each of these, the issues are clear-cut. We cannot do what is wrong even for good purposes.

SOMETIMES public officials have to make a prudential judgment that at a given time in human history, only imperfect legislation is possible. If the intent of this effort is to limit the evil as much as possible, no other approach to legislation seems feasible and the legislation does not eliminate the possibility of introducing more restrictive laws in a more favorable political climate, it is legitimate for public officials to support such legislation. It is always important, however, that such public officials are publicly on record in support of legislation which is committed to the truth about the fullness of respect for human life.

Other life issues call for the exercise of prudential judgments in human situations. For instance, a pastoral judgment needs to be made whether in a particular instance capital punishment is morally justifiable. Our Holy Father and the United States Bishops have cautioned that in their judgment the situations that justify capital punishment are severely limited, if not non-existent. Another example is that with regard to war. The Church teaches that war needs to be a last resort and that very specific conditions need to be fulfilled. The "Catechism of the Catholic Church" indicates that the responsibility to make such decisions about war weighs heavily upon those who have the responsibility for the common good (cf. CCC, 2309).

In the other life issues, it is always important to witness to what is morally correct. At the same time, we preserve the rightful freedom of individuals to make prudential judgments about the use of extraordinary means to prolong life when a person is terminally ill. In the area of artificial contraception, it may not be realistic to try to adopt legislation to make it illegal, but it is certainly possible to work for legislation to ensure the rightful freedom of conscience for medical workers, health care facilities and pharmacists to abide by their moral convictions and to protect citizens from having to pay for the provision of contraceptive services to others. When it comes to ensuring the rights of the poor, there will inevitably be conflicting strategies. It is the responsibility of public officials to devise and support those strategies that most fulfill responsibility to ensure that all people have access to the basic necessities of life.

A recent Vatican document, "A Doctrinal Note on Some Questions Regarding the Participation of Catholics in Political Life," offers valuable guidance in the above issues for public figures. This document does not propose a Catholic agenda, but clarifies for Catholics those truths that are rooted in nature. The Louisiana bishops are sending a copy of this document to each of our elected Catholic public officials in Baton Rouge and Washington. When Catholic officials openly support the taking of human life in abortion, euthanasia or the destruction of human embryos, they are no longer faithful members in the Church and should not partake of Holy Communion. Moreover, citizens who promote this unjust taking of human life by their vote or support of such candidates share in responsibility for this grave evil.

Public discourse needs to be marked by civility. We need courage and honesty to speak the truth about human life. We need humility to listen to both friend and opponent. We need perseverance to continue the struggle for the protection of human life. We need prudence to know when and how to act in the public arena.

God grant us all the wisdom and courage only he can give.

www.ClarionHerald.org Front Page Top
© 2003 Clarion Herald Publishing Company


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortion; alfredchughes; archbishop; archbishophughes; bishop; catechism; catholic; communion; cultureoflife; diocese; la; louisiana; politicians; proabortioncatholics
Dear Archbishop Hughes,

As deputy director of Knights for Life and on behalf of my father, who is the State Pro-Life chairman for the Knights of Columbus, I want to thank you for your letter in the Clarion, January 14, 2004.

Please know that the Knights are in solidarity with you, and that you are in our prayers.

Yours in Christ, WHO IS the Author of Life,

Kevin M. Jeanfreau

1 posted on 01/17/2004 2:55:03 PM PST by cpforlife.org
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN; Coleus; nickcarraway; Mr. Silverback; Canticle_of_Deborah; TenthAmendmentChampion; ...
Letter by ARCHBISHOP ALFRED C. HUGHES on Pro-Abortion "Catholics" and Holy Communion.

Please let me know if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.

2 posted on 01/17/2004 3:00:45 PM PST by cpforlife.org (The Missing Key of the Pro-Life Movement is at www.CpForLife.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cpforlife.org
Is this the same Archbishop Hughes that was involved in the Boston sex abuse scandal?
3 posted on 01/17/2004 3:29:24 PM PST by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mears
Yes.
4 posted on 01/17/2004 3:43:25 PM PST by cpforlife.org (The Missing Key of the Pro-Life Movement is at www.CpForLife.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cpforlife.org
They had an interview with The Most Reverend Raymond Burke, on EWTN. I tried to get on the during the phone in portion to thank him for his stand.

I am glad that finally some Church Leaders are taking a stand.

5 posted on 01/17/2004 3:46:59 PM PST by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cpforlife.org
cpforlife.org,Prolife bump.
6 posted on 01/17/2004 3:55:49 PM PST by fatima (Karen ,Ken 4 ID,Jim-Go Eagles Go,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cpforlife.org
I am not a catholic. But neither are you, if you disbelieve your churches teachings.

IMHO, laypersons' changing attitudes should not change a church. Don't like your churches teachings? Start your own.

7 posted on 01/17/2004 4:02:52 PM PST by mfulstone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: mfulstone
I don't understand your response to the poster. He agrees with the views of the Archbishop and of the Church.
9 posted on 01/17/2004 4:27:16 PM PST by doug from upland (Don't wait until it is too late to stop Hillary -- do something today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mfulstone; cpforlife.org; doug from upland
Don't like your churches teachings?>>>

That's the problem, many bishops are not following Church teachings, that's why Kevin and all of us are VERY HAPPY with Archbishop Hughes.

I see on your homepage that you are into the bible and I hope you weren't trying to "flame" Kevin and start something and are sincere in your post.

There is always a "gray" area within the law: church, criminal and civil which means it's up to interpretation and what many Catholic Freepers want the Church to do is to follow the law as it is written. When it comes to Pro-life, there are NO gray areas in our Catechism and Canon Law... There are many pro-abortion politicians who use the church to garner votes in elections; they go to mass, attend certain functions, conduct voter registration drives and try to get photo ops. and newspaper articles with the priests at these events.

This goes against many underpinnings of the Catholic Faith/Church which is a pro-life church from womb to tomb, from conception to natural death. There seems to be "some" bishops who do not adhere to these rules and actually SUPPORT some of these "usually Democrat" politicians--Which is dead wrong!! It's very frustrating for pro-life Catholics to see bad bishops and politicians doing the wrong and sinful thing.

So, none of us are going to form our own religion, we will expose these bishops and priests, write letters to them and to the Vatican and hope and pray that the bad bishops have a change of heart and set the Catholic politicians straight. Incidentally, one can not receive Holy Communion when one is in grave sin, abortion support is a grave sin and that's why we laud those Bishops, as Kevin did with Archbishop Hughes, who DO the RIGHT thing.
10 posted on 01/17/2004 4:54:22 PM PST by Coleus (STOPP Planned Parenthood)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; annalex; ...
`
11 posted on 01/17/2004 4:55:09 PM PST by Coleus (STOPP Planned Parenthood)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cpforlife.org
When Catholic officials openly support the taking of human life in abortion, euthanasia or the destruction of human embryos, they are no longer faithful members in the Church and should not partake of Holy Communion.

AMEN to that! Politicians seem so full of pride that I doubt any statement such as the one above will have any bearing on how they vote. They fear their constituants more than they fear God.

12 posted on 01/17/2004 5:53:36 PM PST by Gerish (Do not be fearful. God is with you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cpforlife.org
...the same Archbishop Hughes that was involved with the Boston sex abuse scandal...

Was the Archbishop accused in the scandal?
13 posted on 01/17/2004 6:01:20 PM PST by 4integrity (AJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 4integrity
See http://clarionherald.org/20030730/art001.htm
14 posted on 01/17/2004 6:35:25 PM PST by cpforlife.org (The Missing Key of the Pro-Life Movement is at www.CpForLife.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: shanscom
Are you familiar with the NATIONAL AMERICAN HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL in Baton Rouge?

It was an abortion mill where 30,000 children were slaughtered. The only Memorial of its kind in the US. 2 minutes from the College Dr. exit.

16 posted on 01/17/2004 6:52:12 PM PST by cpforlife.org (The Missing Key of the Pro-Life Movement is at www.CpForLife.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: cpforlife.org
Thanks for posting that link to the letter from Archbishop Hughes about his part in the Boston sex abuse mess. It was clear from the Attorney General's press release after the legal report that he only wished to denigrate the Church as much as possible since he could not legally hold them responsible. In doing so, he committed calumny against many good priests and Bishops, Archbishop Hughes included.
18 posted on 01/18/2004 10:40:10 AM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson